20130104000119I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Cessna R182 · Glendale, AZ · January 4, 2013

Date
January 4, 2013 · 11:00 local
Place
Glendale, AZ
Phase of flight
Landing: Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N3700C
Reported as
Cessna R182
Reported engine
Lycoming 0-540 series
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Private pilot
Pilot’s flight hours
1,800 total600 in this make and model1 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Interview conducted by phone with airman. In this interview airman stated that while doing touch and go's at kgeu (Glendale airport, Arizona) he inadvertently landed on runway 1 without putting the landing gear down. The airman stated that the purpose of the flight was to prepare for a title 49 united states code 44709, re-examination of competency, as a private pilot. He also stated that he was under the instruction of a current certificated flight instructor. A review of FAA databases indicates the reason for the re-examination was a previous gear up landing in the same aircraft on November 5, 2011. The airman stated that during the flight, which lasted approximately one hour, he accomplished 6 or 7 touch and go's.the airman stated that while doing the last touch and go, prior to landing gear up, he noticed that the gear was not down and tried to go around but could not. The airman was asked how he knew that the gear was not down. He stated that he looked out his window and visually determined the gear was not down. The airman stated that he touched down after a normal visual approach, without the gear, and the aircraft slid approximately one third the length of the runway. The aircraft then veered to the right ending up in the grass on the right side of the runway. The airman stated that he was using a checklist, but in his statement he did not affirm if he had accomplished a before landing check. The airman stated that there were no distractions prior to touchdown and the wind was light at 6-8 knots from the northeast. The airman was asked what he thought was the cause for landing without the gear. The airman stated that he "just forgot" to put the gear down. The airman also stated that he felt it might be time to "hang it up" and stop flying. The airman was informed of the ability to voluntarily surrender his certificate. He stated that he would consider it as an option. In a subsequent phone call with the airman he stated his intent to voluntarily surrender his certificate. An interview was conducted with the CFI on board at the time of the incident. The CFI confirmed that the airman did forget to put the gear down. The CFI was questioned as to why he did not have the pilot initiate a go-around. He stated that he also did not know the gear was not lowered until just prior to touchdown. This CFI was also a commercially rated pilot and passenger aboard the aircraft on the previous gear up landing with the airman.a telephone interview was conducted with the maintenance person whom the pilot contacted to assess and repair the damage post-accident. This maintenance person was also involved in the repair of the aircraft on the first gear up landing. During this interview the maintenance person stated the aircraft suffered damage to all three blades on the prop which would require removal and inspection in accordance with an airworthiness directive. In addition the aircraft also incurred a broken antenna and damage to the skin on the underside of the empennage located under the cabin portion of the aircraft. The maintenance person indicated that there was no structure or firewall damage.

As the FAA filed it

INTERVIEW CONDUCTED BY PHONE WITH AIRMAN. IN THIS INTERVIEW AIRMAN STATED THAT WHILE DOING TOUCH AND GO'S AT KGEU (GLENDALE AIRPORT, ARIZONA) HE INADVERTENTLY LANDED ON RUNWAY 1 WITHOUT PUTTING THE LANDING GEAR DOWN. THE AIRMAN STATED THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE FLIGHT WAS TO PREPARE FOR A TITLE 49 UNITED STATES CODE 44709, RE-EXAMINATION OF COMPETENCY, AS A PRIVATE PILOT. HE ALSO STATED THAT HE WAS UNDER THE INSTRUCTION OF A CURRENT CERTIFICATED FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR. A REVIEW OF FAA DATABASES INDICATES THE REASON FOR THE RE-EXAMINATION WAS A PREVIOUS GEAR UP LANDING IN THE SAME AIRCRAFT ON NOVEMBER 5, 2011. THE AIRMAN STATED THAT DURING THE FLIGHT, WHICH LASTED APPROXIMATELY ONE HOUR, HE ACCOMPLISHED 6 OR 7 TOUCH AND GO'S.THE AIRMAN STATED THAT WHILE DOING THE LAST TOUCH AND GO, PRIOR TO LANDING GEAR UP, HE NOTICED THAT THE GEAR WAS NOT DOWN AND TRIED TO GO AROUND BUT COULD NOT. THE AIRMAN WAS ASKED HOW HE KNEW THAT THE GEAR WAS NOT DOWN. HE STATED THAT HE LOOKED OUT HIS WINDOW AND VISUALLY DETERMINED THE GEAR WAS NOT DOWN. THE AIRMAN STATED THAT HE TOUCHED DOWN AFTER A NORMAL VISUAL APPROACH, WITHOUT THE GEAR, AND THE AIRCRAFT SLID APPROXIMATELY ONE THIRD THE LENGTH OF THE RUNWAY. THE AIRCRAFT THEN VEERED TO THE RIGHT ENDING UP IN THE GRASS ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE RUNWAY. THE AIRMAN STATED THAT HE WAS USING A CHECKLIST, BUT IN HIS STATEMENT HE DID NOT AFFIRM IF HE HAD ACCOMPLISHED A BEFORE LANDING CHECK. THE AIRMAN STATED THAT THERE WERE NO DISTRACTIONS PRIOR TO TOUCHDOWN AND THE WIND WAS LIGHT AT 6-8 KNOTS FROM THE NORTHEAST. THE AIRMAN WAS ASKED WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS THE CAUSE FOR LANDING WITHOUT THE GEAR. THE AIRMAN STATED THAT HE "JUST FORGOT" TO PUT THE GEAR DOWN. THE AIRMAN ALSO STATED THAT HE FELT IT MIGHT BE TIME TO "HANG IT UP" AND STOP FLYING. THE AIRMAN WAS INFORMED OF THE ABILITY TO VOLUNTARILY SURRENDER HIS CERTIFICATE. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD CONSIDER IT AS AN OPTION. IN A SUBSEQUENT PHONE CALL WITH THE AIRMAN HE STATED HIS INTENT TO VOLUNTARILY SURRENDER HIS CERTIFICATE. AN INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED WITH THE CFI ON BOARD AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. THE CFI CONFIRMED THAT THE AIRMAN DID FORGET TO PUT THE GEAR DOWN.THE CFI WAS QUESTIONED AS TO WHY HE DID NOT HAVE THE PILOT INITIATE A GO-AROUND. HE STATED THAT HE ALSO DID NOT KNOW THE GEAR WAS NOT LOWERED UNTIL JUST PRIOR TO TOUCHDOWN.THIS CFI WAS ALSO A COMMERCIALLY RATED PILOT AND PASSENGER ABOARD THE AIRCRAFT ON THE PREVIOUS GEAR UP LANDING WITH THE AIRMAN.A TELEPHONE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED WITH THE MAINTENANCE PERSON WHOM THE PILOT CONTACTED TO ASSESS AND REPAIR THE DAMAGE POST-ACCIDENT. THIS MAINTENANCE PERSON WAS ALSO INVOLVED IN THE REPAIR OF THE AIRCRAFT ON THE FIRST GEAR UP LANDING. DURING THIS INTERVIEW THE MAINTENANCE PERSON STATED THE AIRCRAFT SUFFERED DAMAGE TO ALL THREE BLADES ON THE PROP WHICH WOULD REQUIRE REMOVAL AND INSPECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE. IN ADDITION THE AIRCRAFT ALSO INCURRED A BROKEN ANTENNA AND DAMAGE TO THE SKIN ON THE UNDERSIDE OF THE EMPENNAGE LOCATED UNDER THE CABIN PORTION OF THE AIRCRAFT. THE MAINTENANCE PERSON INDICATED THAT THERE WAS NO STRUCTURE OR FIREWALL DAMAGE.

Other reports on N3700C · 2

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.