20130428006879A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Piper PA46-500TP · Bryce Canyon, UT · April 28, 2013

Date
April 28, 2013 · 19:58 local
Place
Bryce Canyon, UT
Airport
Bryce Canyon
Phase of flight
Takeoff: Rotation
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N2589U
NTSB investigation
NTSBWPR13LA210
Reported as
Piper PA46-500TP
Reported engine
Pratt & Whitney PT6A
People aboard
6
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Private pilot
Pilot’s flight hours
417 total99 in this make and model39 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

At Bryce Canyon Airport (bce) the pilot prepares the aircraft for the flight to heber airport (36U). Approximately 200LBS of fuel is added to the aircraft (100LBS per side) this would bring the total reported fuel weight onboard the aircraft to approximately 780LBS. Also noted on the return trip the passenger seating configuration is changed, the heaviest passenger is now placed in the FAR aft seat of the aircraft. The pilot lines the aircraft up on the south west end of the airfield heading in a north easterly direction. The pilot begins the takeoff attempt, at approximately 3100? At an indicated airspeed of 80 knots, the PIC attempts rotation (the POH calls for a minimum of 85 knots). The aircraft lifts up into ground effect with the nose of the aircraft at a higher angle than is expected, also pilot reported tail felt heavy or ?squishy?. The pilot decreased the throttle to get the nose of the aircraft down, but the aircraft responds by yawing left with the left wing in a downward attitude. The pilot responds by applying full power to the aircraft, the result from this action is the aircraft rolls slightly left under torsional loads from the application of power. The aircraft at this point is off the main runway headed in a north north east direction crossing over the dirt area between the runway and the taxiway. The aircraft is suspected at different points to be dragging the main landing gear. The nose of the aircraft is still at a high attitude. As the aircraft is passing over the A4 crossover from the runway to the taxiway (the A4 crossover is 3671? From the beginning of the runway), it is believed the aircraft strikes the right and left main landing gear on the south west surface of A4 and bounces up and is airborne for approximately 500? And then again comes into contact with the ground on the north side of the taxiway.. There is a drainage ditch and an embankment on this side of the taxiway. Contact with the embankment shears off the nose and main landing gear and causes the aircraft to violently begin pivoting to the right on the belly of the aircraft. The propeller is in contact with the ground under high power setting and is digging into the ground. The aircraft slid approximately 250? Before coming to rest with the nose of the aircraft facing south. There are reports of fire in the engine compartment. The pilot responds to the fire by pulling the fuel shutoff valve and the fire is extinguished almost immediately. In a picture post the accident, it is noted the landing gear switch is in the up position and the throttle is moved to the idle detent. This is believed to have been done after the aircraft came to rest by the PIC. A reconstruction of the weight and balance was performed with information provided by the PIC, utilizing conservative numbers. The calculation shows the aircraft was within the CG limits by 0.81? Of the aft limit, however; the takeoff weight indicates it is over the max take-off weight allowed by 126.4 lbs. This would also indicate the aircraft was over the max ramp weight before it left the heber, UT airport.

As the FAA filed it

AT BRYCE CANYON AIRPORT (BCE) THE PILOT PREPARES THE AIRCRAFT FOR THE FLIGHT TO HEBER AIRPORT (36U). APPROXIMATELY 200LBS OF FUEL IS ADDED TO THE AIRCRAFT (100LBS PER SIDE) THIS WOULD BRING THE TOTAL REPORTED FUEL WEIGHT ONBOARD THE AIRCRAFT TO APPROXIMATELY 780LBS. ALSO NOTED ON THE RETURN TRIP THE PASSENGER SEATING CONFIGURATION IS CHANGED, THE HEAVIEST PASSENGER IS NOW PLACED IN THE FAR AFT SEAT OF THE AIRCRAFT. THE PILOT LINES THE AIRCRAFT UP ON THE SOUTH WEST END OF THE AIRFIELD HEADING IN A NORTH EASTERLY DIRECTION. THE PILOT BEGINS THE TAKEOFF ATTEMPT, AT APPROXIMATELY 3100? AT AN INDICATED AIRSPEED OF 80 KNOTS, THE PIC ATTEMPTS ROTATION (THE POH CALLS FOR A MINIMUM OF 85 KNOTS). THE AIRCRAFT LIFTS UP INTO GROUND EFFECT WITH THE NOSE OF THE AIRCRAFT AT A HIGHER ANGLE THAN IS EXPECTED, ALSO PILOT REPORTED TAIL FELT HEAVY OR ?SQUISHY?. THE PILOT DECREASED THE THROTTLE TO GET THE NOSE OF THE AIRCRAFT DOWN, BUT THE AIRCRAFT RESPONDS BY YAWING LEFT WITH THE LEFT WING IN A DOWNWARD ATTITUDE. THE PILOT RESPONDS BY APPLYING FULL POWER TO THE AIRCRAFT, THE RESULT FROM THIS ACTION IS THE AIRCRAFT ROLLS SLIGHTLY LEFT UNDER TORSIONAL LOADS FROM THE APPLICATION OF POWER. THE AIRCRAFT AT THIS POINT IS OFF THE MAIN RUNWAY HEADED IN A NORTH NORTH EAST DIRECTION CROSSING OVER THE DIRT AREA BETWEEN THE RUNWAY AND THE TAXIWAY. THE AIRCRAFT IS SUSPECTED AT DIFFERENT POINTS TO BE DRAGGING THE MAIN LANDING GEAR. THE NOSE OF THE AIRCRAFT IS STILL AT A HIGH ATTITUDE. AS THE AIRCRAFT IS PASSING OVER THE A4 CROSSOVER FROM THE RUNWAY TO THE TAXIWAY (THE A4 CROSSOVER IS 3671? FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE RUNWAY), IT IS BELIEVED THE AIRCRAFT STRIKES THE RIGHT AND LEFT MAIN LANDING GEAR ON THE SOUTH WEST SURFACE OF A4 AND BOUNCES UP AND IS AIRBORNE FOR APPROXIMATELY 500? AND THEN AGAIN COMES INTO CONTACT WITH THE GROUND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TAXIWAY.. THERE IS A DRAINAGE DITCH AND AN EMBANKMENT ON THIS SIDE OF THE TAXIWAY. CONTACT WITH THE EMBANKMENT SHEARS OFF THE NOSE AND MAIN LANDING GEAR AND CAUSES THE AIRCRAFT TO VIOLENTLY BEGIN PIVOTING TO THE RIGHT ON THE BELLY OF THE AIRCRAFT. THE PROPELLER IS IN CONTACT WITH THE GROUND UNDER HIGH POWER SETTING AND IS DIGGING INTO THE GROUND. THE AIRCRAFT SLID APPROXIMATELY 250? BEFORE COMING TO REST WITH THE NOSE OF THE AIRCRAFT FACING SOUTH. THERE ARE REPORTS OF FIRE IN THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT. THE PILOT RESPONDS TO THE FIRE BY PULLING THE FUEL SHUTOFF VALVE AND THE FIRE IS EXTINGUISHED ALMOST IMMEDIATELY. IN A PICTURE POST THE ACCIDENT, IT IS NOTED THE LANDING GEAR SWITCH IS IN THE UP POSITION AND THE THROTTLE IS MOVED TO THE IDLE DETENT. THIS IS BELIEVED TO HAVE BEEN DONE AFTER THE AIRCRAFT CAME TO REST BY THE PIC. A RECONSTRUCTION OF THE WEIGHT AND BALANCE WAS PERFORMED WITH INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE PIC, UTILIZING CONSERVATIVE NUMBERS. THE CALCULATION SHOWS THE AIRCRAFT WAS WITHIN THE CG LIMITS BY 0.81? OF THE AFT LIMIT, HOWEVER; THE TAKEOFF WEIGHT INDICATES IT IS OVER THE MAX TAKE-OFF WEIGHT ALLOWED BY 126.4 LBS. THIS WOULD ALSO INDICATE THE AIRCRAFT WAS OVER THE MAX RAMP WEIGHT BEFORE IT LEFT THE HEBER, UT AIRPORT.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.