What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
The investigation revealed that the helicopter, which had been conducting agricultural aerial spraying of chemicals that day, returned to be refueled and topped off with another load of chemical solution by a ground crew loader. According to the pilot?s statement, he lifted off from the loading truck platform after being cleared by the loader, and then began forward flight, when the low RPM horn suddenly began to sound. The pilot pushed the emergency dump button and attempted to fly out of the low RPM condition but stated that the rotor RPM continued to decay and the helicopter began to sink. He then attempted a run-on landing on the field approximately 150 yards from the loading truck and platform. The helicopter skids rocked up on their toes and the left skid dug into the soil, which caused the helicopter to nose over and flip onto its left side. The impact resulted in substantial damage to the helicopter. A post-accident investigation revealed no visible mechanical abnormalities. The pilot verbally stated to both this investigator and the NTSB that he suspected that the accident was caused by his helicopter being overweight for the conditions due to either returning to the loading site with residual chemicals in the tank or a valve malfunction during the loading process resulting in excessive product being supplied. The temperature was approximately 72 degrees f and the wind was calm at the time of the accident. No other evidence was found to dispute the pilot?s statement.
As the FAA filed it
THE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE HELICOPTER, WHICH HAD BEEN CONDUCTING AGRICULTURAL AERIAL SPRAYING OF CHEMICALS THAT DAY, RETURNED TO BE REFUELED AND TOPPED OFF WITH ANOTHER LOAD OF CHEMICAL SOLUTION BY A GROUND CREW LOADER. ACCORDING TO THE PILOT?S STATEMENT, HE LIFTED OFF FROM THE LOADING TRUCK PLATFORM AFTER BEING CLEARED BY THE LOADER, AND THEN BEGAN FORWARD FLIGHT, WHEN THE LOW RPM HORN SUDDENLY BEGAN TO SOUND. THE PILOT PUSHED THE EMERGENCY DUMP BUTTON AND ATTEMPTED TO FLY OUT OF THE LOW RPM CONDITION BUT STATED THAT THE ROTOR RPM CONTINUED TO DECAY AND THE HELICOPTER BEGAN TO SINK. HE THEN ATTEMPTED A RUN-ON LANDING ON THE FIELD APPROXIMATELY 150 YARDS FROM THE LOADING TRUCK AND PLATFORM. THE HELICOPTER SKIDS ROCKED UP ON THEIR TOES AND THE LEFT SKID DUG INTO THE SOIL, WHICH CAUSED THE HELICOPTER TO NOSE OVER AND FLIP ONTO ITS LEFT SIDE. THE IMPACT RESULTED IN SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THE HELICOPTER. A POST-ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REVEALED NO VISIBLE MECHANICAL ABNORMALITIES. THE PILOT VERBALLY STATED TO BOTH THIS INVESTIGATOR AND THE NTSB THAT HE SUSPECTED THAT THE ACCIDENT WAS CAUSED BY HIS HELICOPTER BEING OVERWEIGHT FOR THE CONDITIONS DUE TO EITHER RETURNING TO THE LOADING SITE WITH RESIDUAL CHEMICALS IN THE TANK OR A VALVE MALFUNCTION DURING THE LOADING PROCESS RESULTING IN EXCESSIVE PRODUCT BEING SUPPLIED. THE TEMPERATURE WAS APPROXIMATELY 72 DEGREES F AND THE WIND WAS CALM AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT. NO OTHER EVIDENCE WAS FOUND TO DISPUTE THE PILOT?S STATEMENT.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N442RN · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.