20130620011049I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Cessna 172L · Marine City, MI · June 20, 2013

Date
June 20, 2013 · 13:05 local
Place
Marine City, MI
Airport
Marine City
Phase of flight
Landing: Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N7644G
Reported as
Cessna 172L
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Private pilot
Pilot’s flight hours
115 total25 in this make and model19 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Aircraft ran off the runway and entered a ditch on an attempted landing at Marine City Airport (76G).

The pilot stated that he was conducting a normal full pattern approach to 76G with a crosswind pattern entry over the departure end of runway 4. He selected rwy 4 due to the weather report he received from selfridge angb (kmtc) and from a visual observation of the windsock which showed a right crosswind from the selected runway. He stated that abeam the numbers on the downwind leg at approximately 85 knots, he reduced the power and pushed the flap switch down for approximately 3 seconds. He stated he had only landed at 76G on two other occasions , and given his still relative unfamiliarity with the airport, he found himself focused on the pattern position and obstacle clearance. Given this he stated he failed to note the lack of flap deployment at this time. Stating as he turned final he noted he that his position was high (and he was at approximately 70 knots), so he executed a forward slip to lose altitude. He stated that near the threshold, he exited the slip, aligned the nose to the runway, and held the flap switch to the down position to deploy the remaining flaps. He stated as he was touching down he noted the failure of the flaps to deploy, he judged that due to the touchdown point, remaining runway distance, and the proximity of trees and a busy road at the departure end of the runway, he did not have an adequate distance to execute a go-around. He stated he used as much brakes as he could without pitching over and turned as much as he could without rolling the aircraft and then taxied the aircraft off of the runway and into a ditch off the departure end of the runway.

The aircraft sustained damage to the prop.

As the FAA filed it

AIRCRAFT RAN OFF THE RUNWAY AND ENTERED A DITCH ON AN ATTEMPTED LANDING AT MARINE CITY AIRPORT (76G).

THE PILOT STATED THAT HE WAS CONDUCTING A NORMAL FULL PATTERN APPROACH TO 76G WITH A CROSSWIND PATTERN ENTRY OVER THE DEPARTURE END OF RUNWAY 4. HE SELECTED RWY 4 DUE TO THE WEATHER REPORT HE RECEIVED FROM SELFRIDGE ANGB (KMTC) AND FROM A VISUAL OBSERVATION OF THE WINDSOCK WHICH SHOWED A RIGHT CROSSWIND FROM THE SELECTED RUNWAY. HE STATED THAT ABEAM THE NUMBERS ON THE DOWNWIND LEG AT APPROXIMATELY 85 KNOTS, HE REDUCED THE POWER AND PUSHED THE FLAP SWITCH DOWN FOR APPROXIMATELY 3 SECONDS. HE STATED HE HAD ONLY LANDED AT 76G ON TWO OTHER OCCASIONS , AND GIVEN HIS STILL RELATIVE UNFAMILIARITY WITH THE AIRPORT, HE FOUND HIMSELF FOCUSED ON THE PATTERN POSITION AND OBSTACLE CLEARANCE. GIVEN THIS HE STATED HE FAILED TO NOTE THE LACK OF FLAP DEPLOYMENT AT THIS TIME. STATING AS HE TURNED FINAL HE NOTED HE THAT HIS POSITION WAS HIGH (AND HE WAS AT APPROXIMATELY 70 KNOTS), SO HE EXECUTED A FORWARD SLIP TO LOSE ALTITUDE. HE STATED THAT NEAR THE THRESHOLD, HE EXITED THE SLIP, ALIGNED THE NOSE TO THE RUNWAY, AND HELD THE FLAP SWITCH TO THE DOWN POSITION TO DEPLOY THE REMAINING FLAPS. HE STATED AS HE WAS TOUCHING DOWN HE NOTED THE FAILURE OF THE FLAPS TO DEPLOY, HE JUDGED THAT DUE TO THE TOUCHDOWN POINT, REMAINING RUNWAY DISTANCE, AND THE PROXIMITY OF TREES AND A BUSY ROAD AT THE DEPARTURE END OF THE RUNWAY, HE DID NOT HAVE AN ADEQUATE DISTANCE TO EXECUTE A GO-AROUND. HE STATED HE USED AS MUCH BRAKES AS HE COULD WITHOUT PITCHING OVER AND TURNED AS MUCH AS HE COULD WITHOUT ROLLING THE AIRCRAFT AND THEN TAXIED THE AIRCRAFT OFF OF THE RUNWAY AND INTO A DITCH OFF THE DEPARTURE END OF THE RUNWAY.

THE AIRCRAFT SUSTAINED DAMAGE TO THE PROP.