What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Aircraft, which was configured for parachute operations departed the Brooklyn, Iowa airport with one pilot and one passenger to reposition aircraft to grinnell, IA for maintenance. Both pilot and passenger were wearing parachutes according to company policy. The pilot occupied the left front seat and was secured with a normal seat belt arrangement. The passenger was seated on the floor facing aft behind the pilot secured with a single attachment seatbelt normally used during parachute operations. During climbout, passenger attempted to move from the position occupied during takeoff to a position adjacent to the pilot. During the move the passenger inadvertently deployed the emergency parachute inside the aircraft. Being configured for parachute operations the aircraft did not have the right aft door installed; airflow through the open doorway of the aircraft pulled the parachute out of the aircraft, pulling the passenger with it. Investigation revealed that the passenger had inadvertently put the safety belt through the the emergency parachute d-ring handle instead of through his parachute harness as is the normal procedure. When he attempted to move in the cabin the seatbelt pulled the d- ring. During the forcible egress from the aircraft the passenger was pulled from the aircraft sustaining head injuries on the rear doorjamb of the open doorway. The parachute was temporarily entangled on the horizontal stabilizer of the aircraft requiring the pilot to have to fight for control of the aircraft. The parachute worked itself free. The passenger descended to the ground under full canopy. The passenger's injuries were fatal.
As the FAA filed it
AIRCRAFT, WHICH WAS CONFIGURED FOR PARACHUTE OPERATIONS DEPARTED THE BROOKLYN, IOWA AIRPORT WITH ONE PILOT AND ONE PASSENGER TO REPOSITION AIRCRAFT TO GRINNELL, IA FOR MAINTENANCE. BOTH PILOT AND PASSENGER WERE WEARING PARACHUTES ACCORDING TO COMPANY POLICY. THE PILOT OCCUPIED THE LEFT FRONT SEAT AND WAS SECURED WITH A NORMAL SEAT BELT ARRANGEMENT. THE PASSENGER WAS SEATED ON THE FLOOR FACING AFT BEHIND THE PILOT SECURED WITH A SINGLE ATTACHMENT SEATBELT NORMALLY USED DURING PARACHUTE OPERATIONS. DURING CLIMBOUT, PASSENGER ATTEMPTED TO MOVE FROM THE POSITION OCCUPIED DURING TAKEOFF TO A POSITION ADJACENT TO THE PILOT. DURING THE MOVE THE PASSENGER INADVERTENTLY DEPLOYED THE EMERGENCY PARACHUTE INSIDE THE AIRCRAFT. BEING CONFIGURED FOR PARACHUTE OPERATIONS THE AIRCRAFT DID NOT HAVE THE RIGHT AFT DOOR INSTALLED; AIRFLOW THROUGH THE OPEN DOORWAY OF THE AIRCRAFT PULLED THE PARACHUTE OUT OF THE AIRCRAFT, PULLING THE PASSENGER WITH IT. INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE PASSENGER HAD INADVERTENTLY PUT THE SAFETY BELT THROUGH THE THE EMERGENCY PARACHUTE D-RING HANDLE INSTEAD OF THROUGH HIS PARACHUTE HARNESS AS IS THE NORMAL PROCEDURE. WHEN HE ATTEMPTED TO MOVE IN THE CABIN THE SEATBELT PULLED THE D- RING. DURING THE FORCIBLE EGRESS FROM THE AIRCRAFT THE PASSENGER WAS PULLED FROM THE AIRCRAFT SUSTAINING HEAD INJURIES ON THE REAR DOORJAMB OF THE OPEN DOORWAY. THE PARACHUTE WAS TEMPORARILY ENTANGLED ON THE HORIZONTAL STABILIZER OF THE AIRCRAFT REQUIRING THE PILOT TO HAVE TO FIGHT FOR CONTROL OF THE AIRCRAFT. THE PARACHUTE WORKED ITSELF FREE. THE PASSENGER DESCENDED TO THE GROUND UNDER FULL CANOPY. THE PASSENGER'S INJURIES WERE FATAL.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N2070K · 2
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.