What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Upon departure from runway 01 at the Aiken municipal airport (aik), Aiken, SC, in VMC, the pilot retracted the landing gear. The pilot stated that the landing gear retraction did not appear to be normal as the gear indication lights "went blank" and other electrical equipment, I.e.. GPS, digital engine telemetry, etc., became inoperative.
The pilot then stated that he attempted to extend the gear manually using the emergency check list in the pilot's operating handbook (POH). The pilot further noted that the manual extension did not appear to work because "the gear handle would not move counter-clockwise but jumped over the 'over ride' indent."
Nonetheless, not knowing whether or not the manual extension procedure extended the gear, the pilot attempted to execute a zero flap landing. The pilot subsequently landed the aircraft in a gear up configuration.
As the FAA filed it
UPON DEPARTURE FROM RUNWAY 01 AT THE AIKEN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (AIK), AIKEN, SC, IN VMC, THE PILOT RETRACTED THE LANDING GEAR. THE PILOT STATED THAT THE LANDING GEAR RETRACTION DID NOT APPEAR TO BE NORMAL AS THE GEAR INDICATION LIGHTS "WENT BLANK" AND OTHER ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, I.E.. GPS, DIGITAL ENGINE TELEMETRY, ETC., BECAME INOPERATIVE.
THE PILOT THEN STATED THAT HE ATTEMPTED TO EXTEND THE GEAR MANUALLY USING THE EMERGENCY CHECK LIST IN THE PILOT'S OPERATING HANDBOOK (POH). THE PILOT FURTHER NOTED THAT THE MANUAL EXTENSION DID NOT APPEAR TO WORK BECAUSE "THE GEAR HANDLE WOULD NOT MOVE COUNTER-CLOCKWISE BUT JUMPED OVER THE 'OVER RIDE' INDENT."
NONETHELESS, NOT KNOWING WHETHER OR NOT THE MANUAL EXTENSION PROCEDURE EXTENDED THE GEAR, THE PILOT ATTEMPTED TO EXECUTE A ZERO FLAP LANDING. THE PILOT SUBSEQUENTLY LANDED THE AIRCRAFT IN A GEAR UP CONFIGURATION.