20160108000249A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cirrus SR-22 · Kannapolis, NC · January 8, 2016

Date
January 8, 2016 · 15:38 local
Place
Kannapolis, NC
Phase of flight
Landing: Approach
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
C-GXXJ
Reported as
Cirrus SR-22
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificates
Private pilot, unknown or foreign certificate
Pilot’s flight hours
1,369 total800 in this make and model11 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

On January 8, 2016, at 1538 eastern standard time, a Cirrus SR22, canadian registration c-gxxj, owned and operated by a private individual, was substantially damaged during impact with terrain, after deployment of the Cirrus airplane parachute system (caps), following a loss of control near concord regional airport (jqf), concord, north carolina. The private pilot and passenger were not injured. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed and an instrument flight rules flight plan was filed for the personal flight that departed erie international airport (eri), erie, Pennsylvania, about 1100. The flight was destined for charlotte/douglas international airport (clt), charlotte, north carolina. The airplane was operated under the provisions of title 14 code of federal regulations part 91.

The pilot stated that while the autopilot was engaged and the airplane established on the instrument landing system approach to runway 36R at clt, he observed a "vertical flag drop" [on the primary flight display (PFD)], which indicated to him that the airplane was below the glideslope. The autopilot did not correct for the deviation. Subsequently, as the airplane entered visual meteorological conditions below a cloud layer, the pilot observed [the PFD] was indicating that the airplane was on course; however, the runway was to his right. Air traffic control (ATC) instructed the pilot to go-around and later provided vectors to jqf, located about 15 miles to the northeast.

The pilot hand-flew the airplane toward jqf and was cleared for the GPS approach to runway 02. He initially believed the clearance was for runway 20, and as a result he had difficulty finding the appropriate "fix." After he realized the error, he asked for and received vectors for the GPS approach to runway 02. During that approach, after he was established on the inbound course, the pilot engaged the autopilot again. As he did so, the airplane began to climb and bank sharply to the right. The pilot reported that he then received "terrain" and "envelope protection" warnings, as well as an advisory from ATC indicating he was "too low, and needed to climb." He pushed the "straight and level" button on the autopilot, but the airplane did not respond. He then deployed the caps and secured the engine. The airplane descended into a residential area, landed in a grass yard and impacted a chain link fence.

As the FAA filed it

ON JANUARY 8, 2016, AT 1538 EASTERN STANDARD TIME, A CIRRUS SR22, CANADIAN REGISTRATION C-GXXJ, OWNED AND OPERATED BY A PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL, WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED DURING IMPACT WITH TERRAIN, AFTER DEPLOYMENT OF THE CIRRUS AIRPLANE PARACHUTE SYSTEM (CAPS), FOLLOWING A LOSS OF CONTROL NEAR CONCORD REGIONAL AIRPORT (JQF), CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA. THE PRIVATE PILOT AND PASSENGER WERE NOT INJURED. INSTRUMENT METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED AND AN INSTRUMENT FLIGHT RULES FLIGHT PLAN WAS FILED FOR THE PERSONAL FLIGHT THAT DEPARTED ERIE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (ERI), ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA, ABOUT 1100. THE FLIGHT WAS DESTINED FOR CHARLOTTE/DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (CLT), CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA. THE AIRPLANE WAS OPERATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 14 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 91.

THE PILOT STATED THAT WHILE THE AUTOPILOT WAS ENGAGED AND THE AIRPLANE ESTABLISHED ON THE INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM APPROACH TO RUNWAY 36R AT CLT, HE OBSERVED A "VERTICAL FLAG DROP" [ON THE PRIMARY FLIGHT DISPLAY (PFD)], WHICH INDICATED TO HIM THAT THE AIRPLANE WAS BELOW THE GLIDESLOPE. THE AUTOPILOT DID NOT CORRECT FOR THE DEVIATION. SUBSEQUENTLY, AS THE AIRPLANE ENTERED VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS BELOW A CLOUD LAYER, THE PILOT OBSERVED [THE PFD] WAS INDICATING THAT THE AIRPLANE WAS ON COURSE; HOWEVER, THE RUNWAY WAS TO HIS RIGHT. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL (ATC) INSTRUCTED THE PILOT TO GO-AROUND AND LATER PROVIDED VECTORS TO JQF, LOCATED ABOUT 15 MILES TO THE NORTHEAST.

THE PILOT HAND-FLEW THE AIRPLANE TOWARD JQF AND WAS CLEARED FOR THE GPS APPROACH TO RUNWAY 02. HE INITIALLY BELIEVED THE CLEARANCE WAS FOR RUNWAY 20, AND AS A RESULT HE HAD DIFFICULTY FINDING THE APPROPRIATE "FIX." AFTER HE REALIZED THE ERROR, HE ASKED FOR AND RECEIVED VECTORS FOR THE GPS APPROACH TO RUNWAY 02. DURING THAT APPROACH, AFTER HE WAS ESTABLISHED ON THE INBOUND COURSE, THE PILOT ENGAGED THE AUTOPILOT AGAIN. AS HE DID SO, THE AIRPLANE BEGAN TO CLIMB AND BANK SHARPLY TO THE RIGHT. THE PILOT REPORTED THAT HE THEN RECEIVED "TERRAIN" AND "ENVELOPE PROTECTION" WARNINGS, AS WELL AS AN ADVISORY FROM ATC INDICATING HE WAS "TOO LOW, AND NEEDED TO CLIMB." HE PUSHED THE "STRAIGHT AND LEVEL" BUTTON ON THE AUTOPILOT, BUT THE AIRPLANE DID NOT RESPOND. HE THEN DEPLOYED THE CAPS AND SECURED THE ENGINE. THE AIRPLANE DESCENDED INTO A RESIDENTIAL AREA, LANDED IN A GRASS YARD AND IMPACTED A CHAIN LINK FENCE.