20160626009929I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Aerostar S A YAK-52 · Topeka, KS · June 26, 2016

Date
June 26, 2016 · 09:12 local
Place
Topeka, KS
Phase of flight
Landing: Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N352BW
Reported as
Aerostar S A YAK-52
Reported engine
Vendenyev M14P
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificates
Commercial pilot, flight instructor
Pilot’s flight hours
1,800 total100 in this make and model10 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

On June 26, 2016, at approximately 0912 local (1412 UTC), the airman, holder of a commercial pilot certificate with airplane single and multi- engine land

Class rating was involved in an aircraft incident while landing at the

Topeka billard municipal airport (ktop), Topeka, Kansas.

The aircraft departed from lees summit (lxt) on a visual flight rules (VFR) flight enroute to ktop. Visual meteorological conditions (VMC)

Prevailed at the time of the incident with conditions at ktop reported as

Winds calm, visibility 10 statute miles, and clear skies.

Initially, the airman was cleared for approach to runway 31 and then instructed to make a 360 turn for spacing due to the airman lining up for runway 22. The airman was then re-cleared for approach and landing to runway 31.

The airman elected to retract the gear while making the 360 degree turn.

During the approach and landing phase to runway 31 at ktop, the airman

Failed to extend the aircraft's landing gear prior to touchdown. The aircraft subsequently touched-down on runway 31 and skid to a stop, resulting in minor damage to the aircraft.

The airman, and passenger on-board the aircraft, reported no injuries.

Post-incident photographs of the aircraft revealed the aircraft's propellor blades were damaged upon touchdown as a result of the gear-up landing. No additional damage was noted due to the design of the landing gear while in the retracted position.

Upon recovery, the aircraft's landing gear was extended via the normal extension method.

The airman provided a written statement indicating that he failed to

Extend the landing gear before landing.

As the FAA filed it

ON JUNE 26, 2016, AT APPROXIMATELY 0912 LOCAL (1412 UTC), THE AIRMAN, HOLDER OF A COMMERCIAL PILOT CERTIFICATE WITH AIRPLANE SINGLE AND MULTI- ENGINE LAND

CLASS RATING WAS INVOLVED IN AN AIRCRAFT INCIDENT WHILE LANDING AT THE

TOPEKA BILLARD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (KTOP), TOPEKA, KANSAS.

THE AIRCRAFT DEPARTED FROM LEES SUMMIT (LXT) ON A VISUAL FLIGHT RULES (VFR) FLIGHT ENROUTE TO KTOP. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS (VMC)

PREVAILED AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT WITH CONDITIONS AT KTOP REPORTED AS

WINDS CALM, VISIBILITY 10 STATUTE MILES, AND CLEAR SKIES.

INITIALLY, THE AIRMAN WAS CLEARED FOR APPROACH TO RUNWAY 31 AND THEN INSTRUCTED TO MAKE A 360 TURN FOR SPACING DUE TO THE AIRMAN LINING UP FOR RUNWAY 22. THE AIRMAN WAS THEN RE-CLEARED FOR APPROACH AND LANDING TO RUNWAY 31.

THE AIRMAN ELECTED TO RETRACT THE GEAR WHILE MAKING THE 360 DEGREE TURN.

DURING THE APPROACH AND LANDING PHASE TO RUNWAY 31 AT KTOP, THE AIRMAN

FAILED TO EXTEND THE AIRCRAFT'S LANDING GEAR PRIOR TO TOUCHDOWN. THE AIRCRAFT SUBSEQUENTLY TOUCHED-DOWN ON RUNWAY 31 AND SKID TO A STOP, RESULTING IN MINOR DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT.

THE AIRMAN, AND PASSENGER ON-BOARD THE AIRCRAFT, REPORTED NO INJURIES.

POST-INCIDENT PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE AIRCRAFT REVEALED THE AIRCRAFT'S PROPELLOR BLADES WERE DAMAGED UPON TOUCHDOWN AS A RESULT OF THE GEAR-UP LANDING. NO ADDITIONAL DAMAGE WAS NOTED DUE TO THE DESIGN OF THE LANDING GEAR WHILE IN THE RETRACTED POSITION.

UPON RECOVERY, THE AIRCRAFT'S LANDING GEAR WAS EXTENDED VIA THE NORMAL EXTENSION METHOD.

THE AIRMAN PROVIDED A WRITTEN STATEMENT INDICATING THAT HE FAILED TO

EXTEND THE LANDING GEAR BEFORE LANDING.