What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
On a VFR flight from 77S (creswell, OR) to trk (Truckee, CA), the pilot had a late departure and encountered stronger than anticipated headwind that delayed his arrival until well after dark. The pilot arrived fatigue from the turbulence on the nearly 3 hour flight. Upon entering the trk traffic pattern, the pilot encountered gusty wind conditions when landing runway 20. While the approach was on glideslope, the pilot failed to look FAR enough down the runway and properly judge his rate of decent and height above the ground. Initial ground contact resulted in a bounce. The pilot applied power; however, the power application was insufficient to prevent a second bounce which resulted in a propeller strike.
As the FAA filed it
ON A VFR FLIGHT FROM 77S (CRESWELL, OR) TO TRK (TRUCKEE, CA), THE PILOT HAD A LATE DEPARTURE AND ENCOUNTERED STRONGER THAN ANTICIPATED HEADWIND THAT DELAYED HIS ARRIVAL UNTIL WELL AFTER DARK. THE PILOT ARRIVED FATIGUE FROM THE TURBULENCE ON THE NEARLY 3 HOUR FLIGHT. UPON ENTERING THE TRK TRAFFIC PATTERN, THE PILOT ENCOUNTERED GUSTY WIND CONDITIONS WHEN LANDING RUNWAY 20. WHILE THE APPROACH WAS ON GLIDESLOPE, THE PILOT FAILED TO LOOK FAR ENOUGH DOWN THE RUNWAY AND PROPERLY JUDGE HIS RATE OF DECENT AND HEIGHT ABOVE THE GROUND. INITIAL GROUND CONTACT RESULTED IN A BOUNCE. THE PILOT APPLIED POWER; HOWEVER, THE POWER APPLICATION WAS INSUFFICIENT TO PREVENT A SECOND BOUNCE WHICH RESULTED IN A PROPELLER STRIKE.