What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
It was reported to the gso FSDO by the dom of air Wilmington that their part 135 aircraft, N53340, had sustained damage to the nose landing gear, nose landing gear wheel pant, and firewall. Management personnel from the operator were unable to identify the flight in which the damage was sustained and, therefore, were unable to determine the identity of the pilot in command for that flight. Inspector allen visited the operator on 11/6/17 and conducted interviews with the owner of air Wilmington, the director of maintenance, and two of the flight instructor who had rented the aircraft during the time period the damage was beleived to have occurred. Inspector allen also obtained the rental record for the aircraft. All pilots that rented the aircraft during the time period the damage was believed to have occurred were contacted/interviewed and all stated that they experienced no abnormalities during their flights and did not believe that the aircraft was damaged during any of their landings.
Inspector allen spoke to the NTSB concerning the extent of the damage to the aircraft and they agreed that the damage was minimal and this event was to be classified as an incident.
As the FAA filed it
IT WAS REPORTED TO THE GSO FSDO BY THE DOM OF AIR WILMINGTON THAT THEIR PART 135 AIRCRAFT, N53340, HAD SUSTAINED DAMAGE TO THE NOSE LANDING GEAR, NOSE LANDING GEAR WHEEL PANT, AND FIREWALL. MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL FROM THE OPERATOR WERE UNABLE TO IDENTIFY THE FLIGHT IN WHICH THE DAMAGE WAS SUSTAINED AND, THEREFORE, WERE UNABLE TO DETERMINE THE IDENTITY OF THE PILOT IN COMMAND FOR THAT FLIGHT. INSPECTOR ALLEN VISITED THE OPERATOR ON 11/6/17 AND CONDUCTED INTERVIEWS WITH THE OWNER OF AIR WILMINGTON, THE DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE, AND TWO OF THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR WHO HAD RENTED THE AIRCRAFT DURING THE TIME PERIOD THE DAMAGE WAS BELEIVED TO HAVE OCCURRED. INSPECTOR ALLEN ALSO OBTAINED THE RENTAL RECORD FOR THE AIRCRAFT. ALL PILOTS THAT RENTED THE AIRCRAFT DURING THE TIME PERIOD THE DAMAGE WAS BELIEVED TO HAVE OCCURRED WERE CONTACTED/INTERVIEWED AND ALL STATED THAT THEY EXPERIENCED NO ABNORMALITIES DURING THEIR FLIGHTS AND DID NOT BELIEVE THAT THE AIRCRAFT WAS DAMAGED DURING ANY OF THEIR LANDINGS.
INSPECTOR ALLEN SPOKE TO THE NTSB CONCERNING THE EXTENT OF THE DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT AND THEY AGREED THAT THE DAMAGE WAS MINIMAL AND THIS EVENT WAS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS AN INCIDENT.