20180111000749A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 170B · Skaneateles, NY · January 11, 2018

Date
January 11, 2018 · 11:00 local
Place
Skaneateles, NY
Airport
Murphy Field
Phase of flight
Taxi
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N1997C
NTSB investigation
NTSBGAA18CA100
Reported as
Cessna 170B
Reported engine
Continental C145 series
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificates
Airline transport, commercial pilot, private pilot
Pilot’s flight hours
5,215 total

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

On January 11, 2018, at approximately 1100 EDT, N1997C, a Cessna 170B, sn: 26142, successfully landed, at a private strip, on runway 15 at 06NY (Murphy Field). 06NY is a grass runway. While back taxiing on the runway to the hangar, the aircraft was blown off the runway, into a soybean field, and back onto the runway, where it came to rest on its nose. Wind gusts then blew the aircraft over onto its back. Pilot in command (PIC), was the sole occupant. PIC exited aircraft after it came to rest on its nose, just prior to the wind flipping it over. No injuries were sustained. Aircraft suffered substantial damage.

Marks on the runway indicated the right wheel of the aircraft was skidding for approximately seventy-five feet. Skid marks veered to the left where they exited into the field. Tire marks indicated a hard left hand turn in the field and back onto the runway. There was a plow furrow on the edge of the runway approximately one-foot high. Impact marks on the runway were evident where the aircraft rocked onto its nose. Impact marks on the runway were evident where the tail struck when the aircraft flipped. There was no evidence of fuel leakage where the aircraft came to rest. At the time of my investigation, the runway was wet and soft. After the accident it had rained heavily, and I was unable to verify runway conditions at the time of the accident.

Pilot and witness interviews were consitent. Pilot and witness both stated the wind was gusting strongly at the time of the accident. Pilot and witness both stated runway was wet and soft, but not muddy, at the time of accident.

Counseled pilot regarding his aeronautical decision making. While there were no apparent violations to 14 CFR, the weather conditions and runway conditions were not optimal.

As the FAA filed it

ON JANUARY 11, 2018, AT APPROXIMATELY 1100 EDT, N1997C, A CESSNA 170B, SN: 26142, SUCCESSFULLY LANDED, AT A PRIVATE STRIP, ON RUNWAY 15 AT 06NY (MURPHY FIELD). 06NY IS A GRASS RUNWAY. WHILE BACK TAXIING ON THE RUNWAY TO THE HANGAR, THE AIRCRAFT WAS BLOWN OFF THE RUNWAY, INTO A SOYBEAN FIELD, AND BACK ONTO THE RUNWAY, WHERE IT CAME TO REST ON ITS NOSE. WIND GUSTS THEN BLEW THE AIRCRAFT OVER ONTO ITS BACK. PILOT IN COMMAND (PIC), WAS THE SOLE OCCUPANT. PIC EXITED AIRCRAFT AFTER IT CAME TO REST ON ITS NOSE, JUST PRIOR TO THE WIND FLIPPING IT OVER. NO INJURIES WERE SUSTAINED. AIRCRAFT SUFFERED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE.

MARKS ON THE RUNWAY INDICATED THE RIGHT WHEEL OF THE AIRCRAFT WAS SKIDDING FOR APPROXIMATELY SEVENTY-FIVE FEET. SKID MARKS VEERED TO THE LEFT WHERE THEY EXITED INTO THE FIELD. TIRE MARKS INDICATED A HARD LEFT HAND TURN IN THE FIELD AND BACK ONTO THE RUNWAY. THERE WAS A PLOW FURROW ON THE EDGE OF THE RUNWAY APPROXIMATELY ONE-FOOT HIGH. IMPACT MARKS ON THE RUNWAY WERE EVIDENT WHERE THE AIRCRAFT ROCKED ONTO ITS NOSE. IMPACT MARKS ON THE RUNWAY WERE EVIDENT WHERE THE TAIL STRUCK WHEN THE AIRCRAFT FLIPPED. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF FUEL LEAKAGE WHERE THE AIRCRAFT CAME TO REST. AT THE TIME OF MY INVESTIGATION, THE RUNWAY WAS WET AND SOFT. AFTER THE ACCIDENT IT HAD RAINED HEAVILY, AND I WAS UNABLE TO VERIFY RUNWAY CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT.

PILOT AND WITNESS INTERVIEWS WERE CONSITENT. PILOT AND WITNESS BOTH STATED THE WIND WAS GUSTING STRONGLY AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT. PILOT AND WITNESS BOTH STATED RUNWAY WAS WET AND SOFT, BUT NOT MUDDY, AT THE TIME OF ACCIDENT.

COUNSELED PILOT REGARDING HIS AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING. WHILE THERE WERE NO APPARENT VIOLATIONS TO 14 CFR, THE WEATHER CONDITIONS AND RUNWAY CONDITIONS WERE NOT OPTIMAL.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N1997C · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.