20180329000139A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 172R · New Bedford, MA · March 29, 2018

Date
March 29, 2018 · 09:30 local
Place
New Bedford, MA
Airport
New Bedford Regional
Phase of flight
Landing: Touchdown
Operating rules
Pilot school (Part 141)
Operator
LY8S
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N803BW
NTSB investigation
NTSBGAA18CA199
Reported as
Cessna 172R
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Student
Pilot’s flight hours
77 total77 in this make and model29 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

On March 29, 2018, at about 0945 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 172R single-engine airplane, N803BW, sustained substantial damage during a hard landing on runway 32 at New Bedford Regional Airport (kewb), New Bedford, Massachusetts. The student pilot, who was the sole occupant of the aircraft, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the instructional flight, which was operated under the provisions of title 14 code of federal regulations part 91.

Surveillance video recorded by kewb showed that the airplane bounced upon initial contact with the runway surface. Airplane then pitched down and entered a series of progressively worse pitch oscillations bouncing 3 additional times before settling on the runway and continuing the landing rollout.

According to the student pilot, the approach to the airport was controlled. However, he became fixated on the desired landing spot and described experiencing ?tunnel vision.? Furthermore, the student pilot described failing to initially begin the landing flare due to his fixation on the landing spot. When he did begin to level off the airplane made contact with the runway surface.

The student pilot noticed that taxiing back to the ramp was more difficult (I.e. the airplane was ?shaky?) But had not realized the airplane had sustained damage. According to the student pilot?s certified flight instructor (CFI), who was on the ramp at the time of the student pilot?s return, the nose landing gear tire did not become flat until the airplane turned onto the flight school?s ramp. The CFI went out to the ramp to help the student pilot push back the airplane and it was during this time that the damage to the airplane was first noticed.

Examination of the airplane after the accident revealed that both propeller blade tips exhibited damage consistent with a propeller strike while the engine was making power. The lower skin of the fuselage front section structure assembly was pushed up between the LH and RH bulkhead reinforcement angles. The firewall was found to be buckled above the nose landing gear (NLG) shock strut upper mount bracket and the NLG tire went flat.

As the FAA filed it

ON MARCH 29, 2018, AT ABOUT 0945 EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME, A CESSNA 172R SINGLE-ENGINE AIRPLANE, N803BW, SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE DURING A HARD LANDING ON RUNWAY 32 AT NEW BEDFORD REGIONAL AIRPORT (KEWB), NEW BEDFORD, MASSACHUSETTS. THE STUDENT PILOT, WHO WAS THE SOLE OCCUPANT OF THE AIRCRAFT, WAS NOT INJURED. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED, AND NO FLIGHT PLAN WAS FILED FOR THE INSTRUCTIONAL FLIGHT, WHICH WAS OPERATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 14 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 91.

SURVEILLANCE VIDEO RECORDED BY KEWB SHOWED THAT THE AIRPLANE BOUNCED UPON INITIAL CONTACT WITH THE RUNWAY SURFACE. AIRPLANE THEN PITCHED DOWN AND ENTERED A SERIES OF PROGRESSIVELY WORSE PITCH OSCILLATIONS BOUNCING 3 ADDITIONAL TIMES BEFORE SETTLING ON THE RUNWAY AND CONTINUING THE LANDING ROLLOUT.

ACCORDING TO THE STUDENT PILOT, THE APPROACH TO THE AIRPORT WAS CONTROLLED. HOWEVER, HE BECAME FIXATED ON THE DESIRED LANDING SPOT AND DESCRIBED EXPERIENCING ?TUNNEL VISION.? FURTHERMORE, THE STUDENT PILOT DESCRIBED FAILING TO INITIALLY BEGIN THE LANDING FLARE DUE TO HIS FIXATION ON THE LANDING SPOT. WHEN HE DID BEGIN TO LEVEL OFF THE AIRPLANE MADE CONTACT WITH THE RUNWAY SURFACE.

THE STUDENT PILOT NOTICED THAT TAXIING BACK TO THE RAMP WAS MORE DIFFICULT (I.E. THE AIRPLANE WAS ?SHAKY?) BUT HAD NOT REALIZED THE AIRPLANE HAD SUSTAINED DAMAGE. ACCORDING TO THE STUDENT PILOT?S CERTIFIED FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR (CFI), WHO WAS ON THE RAMP AT THE TIME OF THE STUDENT PILOT?S RETURN, THE NOSE LANDING GEAR TIRE DID NOT BECOME FLAT UNTIL THE AIRPLANE TURNED ONTO THE FLIGHT SCHOOL?S RAMP. THE CFI WENT OUT TO THE RAMP TO HELP THE STUDENT PILOT PUSH BACK THE AIRPLANE AND IT WAS DURING THIS TIME THAT THE DAMAGE TO THE AIRPLANE WAS FIRST NOTICED.

EXAMINATION OF THE AIRPLANE AFTER THE ACCIDENT REVEALED THAT BOTH PROPELLER BLADE TIPS EXHIBITED DAMAGE CONSISTENT WITH A PROPELLER STRIKE WHILE THE ENGINE WAS MAKING POWER. THE LOWER SKIN OF THE FUSELAGE FRONT SECTION STRUCTURE ASSEMBLY WAS PUSHED UP BETWEEN THE LH AND RH BULKHEAD REINFORCEMENT ANGLES. THE FIREWALL WAS FOUND TO BE BUCKLED ABOVE THE NOSE LANDING GEAR (NLG) SHOCK STRUT UPPER MOUNT BRACKET AND THE NLG TIRE WENT FLAT.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.