What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Instructor was introduccing the run-on landing maneuver to a private pilot in the R-44 transistion/qualification course. The run-on landing was a sod area of the airport that was frequently used for the maneuver and has been used for more than 10 years. The instructor did not conduct a surface recon. The aircraft touched down at approximatly 10 knots and while sliding forward the instructor saw a field drain sticking up approximately 3 inches. The instructor raised the collective to avoid striking the drain. The left skid struck the drain about midway along the skid where it caught on to a skid pad and broke the center section of the skid tube between the two cross tubes away. Both manufacturers vertical and lateral harding landing inspections revealed no damage to the skid, landing gear fairings and a dented engine cowl on the left side. Classified as an incident with only minor damage. Contributing factors include airport had not mowed the grass and it concealed the drain from vision until the aircraft was a short distance away. These hazards were known to the instructor but they had not been marked like those in another area of the airport where simuliar activities are common.
As the FAA filed it
INSTRUCTOR WAS INTRODUCCING THE RUN-ON LANDING MANEUVER TO A PRIVATE PILOT IN THE R-44 TRANSISTION/QUALIFICATION COURSE. THE RUN-ON LANDING WAS A SOD AREA OF THE AIRPORT THAT WAS FREQUENTLY USED FOR THE MANEUVER AND HAS BEEN USED FOR MORE THAN 10 YEARS. THE INSTRUCTOR DID NOT CONDUCT A SURFACE RECON. THE AIRCRAFT TOUCHED DOWN AT APPROXIMATLY 10 KNOTS AND WHILE SLIDING FORWARD THE INSTRUCTOR SAW A FIELD DRAIN STICKING UP APPROXIMATELY 3 INCHES. THE INSTRUCTOR RAISED THE COLLECTIVE TO AVOID STRIKING THE DRAIN. THE LEFT SKID STRUCK THE DRAIN ABOUT MIDWAY ALONG THE SKID WHERE IT CAUGHT ON TO A SKID PAD AND BROKE THE CENTER SECTION OF THE SKID TUBE BETWEEN THE TWO CROSS TUBES AWAY. BOTH MANUFACTURERS VERTICAL AND LATERAL HARDING LANDING INSPECTIONS REVEALED NO DAMAGE TO THE SKID, LANDING GEAR FAIRINGS AND A DENTED ENGINE COWL ON THE LEFT SIDE. CLASSIFIED AS AN INCIDENT WITH ONLY MINOR DAMAGE. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS INCLUDE AIRPORT HAD NOT MOWED THE GRASS AND IT CONCEALED THE DRAIN FROM VISION UNTIL THE AIRCRAFT WAS A SHORT DISTANCE AWAY. THESE HAZARDS WERE KNOWN TO THE INSTRUCTOR BUT THEY HAD NOT BEEN MARKED LIKE THOSE IN ANOTHER AREA OF THE AIRPORT WHERE SIMULIAR ACTIVITIES ARE COMMON.