What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Pilot stated the first takeoff was normal the hydraulically operated landing gear retracted normally but the hydraulically operated flaps would not retract because the flap handle was ?stuck?. The gear was extended normally and an uneventful landing was made. The aircraft was shut down and inspected by the pilot and no cause was found but the flap system started to operate normally. The pilot then restarted the aircraft end took off again. During the second climb out the gear and flaps retracted normally, the flaps extended normally but the gear would not extend because the gear handle was now ?stuck?. After discussion and an attempt to use the emergency pump handle the pilot and passenger agreed to land gear up on the runway. An uneventful belly landing was conducted with minimal damage to the keel. The POH was not consulted for emergency procedures.
As the FAA filed it
PILOT STATED THE FIRST TAKEOFF WAS NORMAL THE HYDRAULICALLY OPERATED LANDING GEAR RETRACTED NORMALLY BUT THE HYDRAULICALLY OPERATED FLAPS WOULD NOT RETRACT BECAUSE THE FLAP HANDLE WAS ?STUCK?. THE GEAR WAS EXTENDED NORMALLY AND AN UNEVENTFUL LANDING WAS MADE. THE AIRCRAFT WAS SHUT DOWN AND INSPECTED BY THE PILOT AND NO CAUSE WAS FOUND BUT THE FLAP SYSTEM STARTED TO OPERATE NORMALLY. THE PILOT THEN RESTARTED THE AIRCRAFT END TOOK OFF AGAIN. DURING THE SECOND CLIMB OUT THE GEAR AND FLAPS RETRACTED NORMALLY, THE FLAPS EXTENDED NORMALLY BUT THE GEAR WOULD NOT EXTEND BECAUSE THE GEAR HANDLE WAS NOW ?STUCK?. AFTER DISCUSSION AND AN ATTEMPT TO USE THE EMERGENCY PUMP HANDLE THE PILOT AND PASSENGER AGREED TO LAND GEAR UP ON THE RUNWAY. AN UNEVENTFUL BELLY LANDING WAS CONDUCTED WITH MINIMAL DAMAGE TO THE KEEL. THE POH WAS NOT CONSULTED FOR EMERGENCY PROCEDURES.
Other reports on N1122L · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.