What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
On June 7, 2019 N7227F was on a training flight with an instructor and a student. The instructor demonstrated a soft field approach and landing into Merrymeeting field (08B) runway 32. Upon landing, the instructor demonstrated soft field taxi procedures and taxied back to runway 32 to prepare for a departure. Upon application of power to take off runway 32, the instructor felt that the grass was too wet and the aircraft was not accelerating fast enough to safely depart, so he aborted the take off. The instructor taxied back, shut down the aircraft, and discussed the airport conditions with local airport management. The instructor felt he could depart from runway 14, which appeared to be drier in the first 1,000 feet and have the performance to be airborne by 1,000 feet. The instructor indicated using 10 degrees of flaps and initiated the take off roll. The aircraft accelerated and began to depart the surface about approximately the half way point on the runway. This was evidenced by landing gear markings on the turf showing the aircraft did momentarily leave the ground, but then settled back onto the runway surface. The instructor said it was not accelerating fast enough to avoid the tree line at the end of the runway, and he made the decision to abort the take off resulting in the aircraft going off of the end of the runway and subsequently being substantially damaged.
As the FAA filed it
ON JUNE 7, 2019 N7227F WAS ON A TRAINING FLIGHT WITH AN INSTRUCTOR AND A STUDENT. THE INSTRUCTOR DEMONSTRATED A SOFT FIELD APPROACH AND LANDING INTO MERRYMEETING FIELD (08B) RUNWAY 32. UPON LANDING, THE INSTRUCTOR DEMONSTRATED SOFT FIELD TAXI PROCEDURES AND TAXIED BACK TO RUNWAY 32 TO PREPARE FOR A DEPARTURE. UPON APPLICATION OF POWER TO TAKE OFF RUNWAY 32, THE INSTRUCTOR FELT THAT THE GRASS WAS TOO WET AND THE AIRCRAFT WAS NOT ACCELERATING FAST ENOUGH TO SAFELY DEPART, SO HE ABORTED THE TAKE OFF. THE INSTRUCTOR TAXIED BACK, SHUT DOWN THE AIRCRAFT, AND DISCUSSED THE AIRPORT CONDITIONS WITH LOCAL AIRPORT MANAGEMENT. THE INSTRUCTOR FELT HE COULD DEPART FROM RUNWAY 14, WHICH APPEARED TO BE DRIER IN THE FIRST 1,000 FEET AND HAVE THE PERFORMANCE TO BE AIRBORNE BY 1,000 FEET. THE INSTRUCTOR INDICATED USING 10 DEGREES OF FLAPS AND INITIATED THE TAKE OFF ROLL. THE AIRCRAFT ACCELERATED AND BEGAN TO DEPART THE SURFACE ABOUT APPROXIMATELY THE HALF WAY POINT ON THE RUNWAY. THIS WAS EVIDENCED BY LANDING GEAR MARKINGS ON THE TURF SHOWING THE AIRCRAFT DID MOMENTARILY LEAVE THE GROUND, BUT THEN SETTLED BACK ONTO THE RUNWAY SURFACE. THE INSTRUCTOR SAID IT WAS NOT ACCELERATING FAST ENOUGH TO AVOID THE TREE LINE AT THE END OF THE RUNWAY, AND HE MADE THE DECISION TO ABORT THE TAKE OFF RESULTING IN THE AIRCRAFT GOING OFF OF THE END OF THE RUNWAY AND SUBSEQUENTLY BEING SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N7227F · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.