20191001013769A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Taylorcraft BC12-D · Longs, SC · October 1, 2019

Date
October 1, 2019 · 11:00 local
Place
Longs, SC
Phase of flight
Cruise/Level Flight
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N95131
NTSB investigation
NTSBGAA20CA001
Reported as
Taylorcraft BC12-D
Reported engine
Continental A&C65 series
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
1
Pilot’s certificates
Commercial pilot, flight instructor
Pilot’s flight hours
5,100 total40 in this make and model60 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Pilot departed new london airport (W90) in route to north myrtle beach airport (kcre). He planned to use 9.7 gallons of gas. Prior to arriving at kcre all 12 gallons of fuel on board were exhausted. Pilot landed in field and did not stop aircraft prior contacting trees at the end of field. Substantial damage to both wings and the landing gear were the result. Pilot suffered one small scratch to finger that was bandaged at the scene.

Upon arrival at the scene the next morning I and one other inspector inspected the aircraft. The left wing had suffered substantial damage from contact with trees, to include the spar being broken. The left wing fuel tank appeared to not be in a useable condition. The supply line had substantial corrosion evident and the drain valve had been removed and the opening had been covered with green painters tape. The right wing tank appeared to have not been used and had some type of preservative coating the inside. When asked about the wing tanks the pilot did not realize they were installed. The nose tank was the only fuel tank utilized for the flight according to the pilot. The nose tank showed evidence of fuel usage and the float cork showed evidence of recent fuel usage, but no fuel remained in the tank. There was no evidence of fuel spillage on the ground, airframe or wing structure. There was no post crash fire.

As the FAA filed it

PILOT DEPARTED NEW LONDON AIRPORT (W90) IN ROUTE TO NORTH MYRTLE BEACH AIRPORT (KCRE). HE PLANNED TO USE 9.7 GALLONS OF GAS. PRIOR TO ARRIVING AT KCRE ALL 12 GALLONS OF FUEL ON BOARD WERE EXHAUSTED. PILOT LANDED IN FIELD AND DID NOT STOP AIRCRAFT PRIOR CONTACTING TREES AT THE END OF FIELD. SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO BOTH WINGS AND THE LANDING GEAR WERE THE RESULT. PILOT SUFFERED ONE SMALL SCRATCH TO FINGER THAT WAS BANDAGED AT THE SCENE.

UPON ARRIVAL AT THE SCENE THE NEXT MORNING I AND ONE OTHER INSPECTOR INSPECTED THE AIRCRAFT. THE LEFT WING HAD SUFFERED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE FROM CONTACT WITH TREES, TO INCLUDE THE SPAR BEING BROKEN. THE LEFT WING FUEL TANK APPEARED TO NOT BE IN A USEABLE CONDITION. THE SUPPLY LINE HAD SUBSTANTIAL CORROSION EVIDENT AND THE DRAIN VALVE HAD BEEN REMOVED AND THE OPENING HAD BEEN COVERED WITH GREEN PAINTERS TAPE. THE RIGHT WING TANK APPEARED TO HAVE NOT BEEN USED AND HAD SOME TYPE OF PRESERVATIVE COATING THE INSIDE. WHEN ASKED ABOUT THE WING TANKS THE PILOT DID NOT REALIZE THEY WERE INSTALLED. THE NOSE TANK WAS THE ONLY FUEL TANK UTILIZED FOR THE FLIGHT ACCORDING TO THE PILOT. THE NOSE TANK SHOWED EVIDENCE OF FUEL USAGE AND THE FLOAT CORK SHOWED EVIDENCE OF RECENT FUEL USAGE, BUT NO FUEL REMAINED IN THE TANK. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF FUEL SPILLAGE ON THE GROUND, AIRFRAME OR WING STRUCTURE. THERE WAS NO POST CRASH FIRE.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.