What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
The PIC was taking off on runway 32, after lift off and during the initial climb, got to about tree level height and started to hear the stall horn. He then lower the nose to gain airspeed and then increased pitch again to try to climb but the aircraft would not climb. He tried again to do this same process of lowering the nose to try to gain airspeed and attempted to ease the nose up again and that was when the nose dropped (stalled) and the left wing impacted the adjacent grass taxiway. The PIC stated that he experienced some wind shear which caused the aircraft to stall.
During the interview of the PIC he stated that when he left his house
That day he noticed that the wind was a little breezy. When he got to the
Airport he stated that the wind was out of the n-ne but somewhat lite and
Variable with a right cross-wind on his takeoff from runway 32. The
Nearest weather reporting point was approximately 10 miles to the south
Of the airport at krdu. The wind at that site was out of the sw at 12-16
KTS with gusts to 20 KTS. The PIC stated that the run up was normal and
Had normal take off power during the takeoff. The PIC stated that he had
Approximately ¾ of fuel on board and had calculated the w & b to be
Within limits. During the post-accident inspection of the aircraft it was
Verified that all flight controls had continuity and all of the engine
Controls, except the carburetor heat control, were checked and had
Freedom of movement and went to the stops. From all indications during
The post accident inspection the engine was running normally. It is the
Opinion of this ASI that the PIC has had extensive training recognizing
Wind shear and what causes it and due to the conditions, he attempted to
Correct the situation but could not do anything to counter the shear
And/or sink air.
As the FAA filed it
THE PIC WAS TAKING OFF ON RUNWAY 32, AFTER LIFT OFF AND DURING THE INITIAL CLIMB, GOT TO ABOUT TREE LEVEL HEIGHT AND STARTED TO HEAR THE STALL HORN. HE THEN LOWER THE NOSE TO GAIN AIRSPEED AND THEN INCREASED PITCH AGAIN TO TRY TO CLIMB BUT THE AIRCRAFT WOULD NOT CLIMB. HE TRIED AGAIN TO DO THIS SAME PROCESS OF LOWERING THE NOSE TO TRY TO GAIN AIRSPEED AND ATTEMPTED TO EASE THE NOSE UP AGAIN AND THAT WAS WHEN THE NOSE DROPPED (STALLED) AND THE LEFT WING IMPACTED THE ADJACENT GRASS TAXIWAY. THE PIC STATED THAT HE EXPERIENCED SOME WIND SHEAR WHICH CAUSED THE AIRCRAFT TO STALL.
DURING THE INTERVIEW OF THE PIC HE STATED THAT WHEN HE LEFT HIS HOUSE
THAT DAY HE NOTICED THAT THE WIND WAS A LITTLE BREEZY. WHEN HE GOT TO THE
AIRPORT HE STATED THAT THE WIND WAS OUT OF THE N-NE BUT SOMEWHAT LITE AND
VARIABLE WITH A RIGHT CROSS-WIND ON HIS TAKEOFF FROM RUNWAY 32. THE
NEAREST WEATHER REPORTING POINT WAS APPROXIMATELY 10 MILES TO THE SOUTH
OF THE AIRPORT AT KRDU. THE WIND AT THAT SITE WAS OUT OF THE SW AT 12-16
KTS WITH GUSTS TO 20 KTS. THE PIC STATED THAT THE RUN UP WAS NORMAL AND
HAD NORMAL TAKE OFF POWER DURING THE TAKEOFF. THE PIC STATED THAT HE HAD
APPROXIMATELY ¾ OF FUEL ON BOARD AND HAD CALCULATED THE W & B TO BE
WITHIN LIMITS. DURING THE POST-ACCIDENT INSPECTION OF THE AIRCRAFT IT WAS
VERIFIED THAT ALL FLIGHT CONTROLS HAD CONTINUITY AND ALL OF THE ENGINE
CONTROLS, EXCEPT THE CARBURETOR HEAT CONTROL, WERE CHECKED AND HAD
FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT AND WENT TO THE STOPS. FROM ALL INDICATIONS DURING
THE POST ACCIDENT INSPECTION THE ENGINE WAS RUNNING NORMALLY. IT IS THE
OPINION OF THIS ASI THAT THE PIC HAS HAD EXTENSIVE TRAINING RECOGNIZING
WIND SHEAR AND WHAT CAUSES IT AND DUE TO THE CONDITIONS, HE ATTEMPTED TO
CORRECT THE SITUATION BUT COULD NOT DO ANYTHING TO COUNTER THE SHEAR
AND/OR SINK AIR.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.