20210112001919A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Hughes 269C · Spanish Fork, UT · January 12, 2021

Date
January 12, 2021 · 13:50 local
Place
Spanish Fork, UT
Phase of flight
Other, Specify
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N7480F
Reported as
Hughes 269C
Reported engine
Lycoming HIO-360
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificates
Commercial pilot, flight instructor
Pilot’s flight hours
3,650 total405 in this make and model25 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

The crew was conducting required training in preparation for the students category and class rating check ride in two days. The crew practiced several autorotations at the Spanish Fork airport (spk), and proceeded to the practice area west of the airport. After recovering from a practice settling with power maneuver, the instructor rolled the throttle to idle and announced the simulated engine failure. At some point in the autorotation the engine quit without the pilots realizing it. The instructor called for a power recovery between 300 to 500 feet above the ground. The student in anticipation of the engine spooling up while rolling on the throttle started to pull collective. Noticing the engine had failed, the instructor took the controls and landed at the point intended for the practice autorotation. The skids dug into the soft plowed field causing the right skid to collapse and the aircraft to roll on its side.; the helicopter incurred substantial damage as a result.

The pilots were wearing noise cancelling headsets when flying. They claim the engine cannot heard at idle while using the noise cancelling headsets. The lack of audible ques, commonly used as a primary engine monitoring with piston engines, was not present to give an immediate indication of an engine failure.

As the FAA filed it

THE CREW WAS CONDUCTING REQUIRED TRAINING IN PREPARATION FOR THE STUDENTS CATEGORY AND CLASS RATING CHECK RIDE IN TWO DAYS. THE CREW PRACTICED SEVERAL AUTOROTATIONS AT THE SPANISH FORK AIRPORT (SPK), AND PROCEEDED TO THE PRACTICE AREA WEST OF THE AIRPORT. AFTER RECOVERING FROM A PRACTICE SETTLING WITH POWER MANEUVER, THE INSTRUCTOR ROLLED THE THROTTLE TO IDLE AND ANNOUNCED THE SIMULATED ENGINE FAILURE. AT SOME POINT IN THE AUTOROTATION THE ENGINE QUIT WITHOUT THE PILOTS REALIZING IT. THE INSTRUCTOR CALLED FOR A POWER RECOVERY BETWEEN 300 TO 500 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND. THE STUDENT IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ENGINE SPOOLING UP WHILE ROLLING ON THE THROTTLE STARTED TO PULL COLLECTIVE. NOTICING THE ENGINE HAD FAILED, THE INSTRUCTOR TOOK THE CONTROLS AND LANDED AT THE POINT INTENDED FOR THE PRACTICE AUTOROTATION. THE SKIDS DUG INTO THE SOFT PLOWED FIELD CAUSING THE RIGHT SKID TO COLLAPSE AND THE AIRCRAFT TO ROLL ON ITS SIDE.; THE HELICOPTER INCURRED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE AS A RESULT.

THE PILOTS WERE WEARING NOISE CANCELLING HEADSETS WHEN FLYING. THEY CLAIM THE ENGINE CANNOT HEARD AT IDLE WHILE USING THE NOISE CANCELLING HEADSETS. THE LACK OF AUDIBLE QUES, COMMONLY USED AS A PRIMARY ENGINE MONITORING WITH PISTON ENGINES, WAS NOT PRESENT TO GIVE AN IMMEDIATE INDICATION OF AN ENGINE FAILURE.

Other reports on N7480F · 3

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.