What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
The investigation revealed that N5478G, a CE-421 had veered off the right side of the departure end of runway 18 after landing. There were visible tire marks on the runway from the excursion that began about 550-600 feet prior to the runway end. The aircraft came to rest at a 90 degree angle in the grass between runway 18 and taxiway alpha. The top of a runway light was missing/sheared off as a result of the aircraft departing the runway. The aircraft sustained minor damage. The pilot stated that there were no known flight control malfunctions. The pilot explained that he had floated and landed past his landing target on the runway but did not estimate approximately how many feet down the runway that the touchdown was. The witnesses, both pilots, estimated that the aircraft touched down more than halfway down the runway, at approximately 2,100-2,200 feet. After the touchdown, the pilot stated that he was experiencing difficulty with slowing down during the landing rollout even though he attested that the brakes seemed to be working normally. He stated that he did not want to go off the end of the runway straight ahead so he made the decision to veer off into the grass to the right of the runway. The pilot and witnesses attested to a light tailwind on the approach to land. The wind sock, which was less than halfway extended, also indicated a light tailwind.
As the FAA filed it
THE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT N5478G, A CE-421 HAD VEERED OFF THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE DEPARTURE END OF RUNWAY 18 AFTER LANDING. THERE WERE VISIBLE TIRE MARKS ON THE RUNWAY FROM THE EXCURSION THAT BEGAN ABOUT 550-600 FEET PRIOR TO THE RUNWAY END. THE AIRCRAFT CAME TO REST AT A 90 DEGREE ANGLE IN THE GRASS BETWEEN RUNWAY 18 AND TAXIWAY ALPHA. THE TOP OF A RUNWAY LIGHT WAS MISSING/SHEARED OFF AS A RESULT OF THE AIRCRAFT DEPARTING THE RUNWAY. THE AIRCRAFT SUSTAINED MINOR DAMAGE. THE PILOT STATED THAT THERE WERE NO KNOWN FLIGHT CONTROL MALFUNCTIONS. THE PILOT EXPLAINED THAT HE HAD FLOATED AND LANDED PAST HIS LANDING TARGET ON THE RUNWAY BUT DID NOT ESTIMATE APPROXIMATELY HOW MANY FEET DOWN THE RUNWAY THAT THE TOUCHDOWN WAS. THE WITNESSES, BOTH PILOTS, ESTIMATED THAT THE AIRCRAFT TOUCHED DOWN MORE THAN HALFWAY DOWN THE RUNWAY, AT APPROXIMATELY 2,100-2,200 FEET. AFTER THE TOUCHDOWN, THE PILOT STATED THAT HE WAS EXPERIENCING DIFFICULTY WITH SLOWING DOWN DURING THE LANDING ROLLOUT EVEN THOUGH HE ATTESTED THAT THE BRAKES SEEMED TO BE WORKING NORMALLY. HE STATED THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO GO OFF THE END OF THE RUNWAY STRAIGHT AHEAD SO HE MADE THE DECISION TO VEER OFF INTO THE GRASS TO THE RIGHT OF THE RUNWAY. THE PILOT AND WITNESSES ATTESTED TO A LIGHT TAILWIND ON THE APPROACH TO LAND. THE WIND SOCK, WHICH WAS LESS THAN HALFWAY EXTENDED, ALSO INDICATED A LIGHT TAILWIND.