What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
N343PA, an Amazon UAS MK27, SN000365 operated under part 135 had a complete failure of the number 5 propeller p/n 117488-01, s/n 117488.reva.238 after less than one minute in service after installation on 05/25/21. The failure occurred during the vtol phase at 12 feet AGL. The no. 5 propeller blade debonded from the mount and caused an uncontrolled condition in flight while descending towards the ground. After the no. 5 propeller departed the aircraft it became inverted and landed upside down. The aircraft impacted the ground under power in an uncontrolled state and was substantially damaged structurally. No injuries to persons on ground and no damage to property other than UAS. UAS remote pilot error was not reported nor suspected. Technician installation error was not reported nor suspected.
The aircraft was operating near the Pendleton, OR airport at a practice delivery site and was not engaged in actual part 135 delivery operations at the time. Location of practice area was .75 miles NE of east end rwy 25 in the pur test range. Aircraft was removed from site before FSDO was notified the next day. On scene investigation was not possible.
Ch was notified by FSDO iic that accidents and incidents reported to ntsb/faa should not be disturbed or moved until after release of wreckage by NTSB or FAA iic.
As the FAA filed it
N343PA, AN AMAZON UAS MK27, SN000365 OPERATED UNDER PART 135 HAD A COMPLETE FAILURE OF THE NUMBER 5 PROPELLER P/N 117488-01, S/N 117488.REVA.238 AFTER LESS THAN ONE MINUTE IN SERVICE AFTER INSTALLATION ON 05/25/21. THE FAILURE OCCURRED DURING THE VTOL PHASE AT 12 FEET AGL. THE NO. 5 PROPELLER BLADE DEBONDED FROM THE MOUNT AND CAUSED AN UNCONTROLLED CONDITION IN FLIGHT WHILE DESCENDING TOWARDS THE GROUND. AFTER THE NO. 5 PROPELLER DEPARTED THE AIRCRAFT IT BECAME INVERTED AND LANDED UPSIDE DOWN. THE AIRCRAFT IMPACTED THE GROUND UNDER POWER IN AN UNCONTROLLED STATE AND WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED STRUCTURALLY. NO INJURIES TO PERSONS ON GROUND AND NO DAMAGE TO PROPERTY OTHER THAN UAS. UAS REMOTE PILOT ERROR WAS NOT REPORTED NOR SUSPECTED. TECHNICIAN INSTALLATION ERROR WAS NOT REPORTED NOR SUSPECTED.
THE AIRCRAFT WAS OPERATING NEAR THE PENDLETON, OR AIRPORT AT A PRACTICE DELIVERY SITE AND WAS NOT ENGAGED IN ACTUAL PART 135 DELIVERY OPERATIONS AT THE TIME. LOCATION OF PRACTICE AREA WAS .75 MILES NE OF EAST END RWY 25 IN THE PUR TEST RANGE. AIRCRAFT WAS REMOVED FROM SITE BEFORE FSDO WAS NOTIFIED THE NEXT DAY. ON SCENE INVESTIGATION WAS NOT POSSIBLE.
CH WAS NOTIFIED BY FSDO IIC THAT ACCIDENTS AND INCIDENTS REPORTED TO NTSB/FAA SHOULD NOT BE DISTURBED OR MOVED UNTIL AFTER RELEASE OF WRECKAGE BY NTSB OR FAA IIC.