What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
On 11/16/2021 an airman was landing in the area of north Palm Springs. The flight was conducted under part 91. The purpose was to track cattle. In the area. Upon his descent the airman stated he checked the area and felt he was clear of all obstacles. During descent to the ground the rotor blade of his helicopter struck a small branch of a tree limb.
The airman stated he did not realize he was as close to the tree as he actually was and thought he was clear of all obstacles. He also stated the rotor blades kicked up a lot of dust from the ground and obstructed his visibility of the surrounding area.
The airman stated he inspected the rotor blade after coming in contact with the tree limb and determined he was able to take off again. Once the helicopter returned to its base. The airman, who is the company owner, had the blades replaced as they were coming up on a required inspection anyway. The airman also replace other parts unrelated to the incident as they were required as part of the next inspection.
Airman returned the aircraft back to service after its required inspection was completed.
As the FAA filed it
ON 11/16/2021 AN AIRMAN WAS LANDING IN THE AREA OF NORTH PALM SPRINGS. THE FLIGHT WAS CONDUCTED UNDER PART 91. THE PURPOSE WAS TO TRACK CATTLE. IN THE AREA. UPON HIS DESCENT THE AIRMAN STATED HE CHECKED THE AREA AND FELT HE WAS CLEAR OF ALL OBSTACLES. DURING DESCENT TO THE GROUND THE ROTOR BLADE OF HIS HELICOPTER STRUCK A SMALL BRANCH OF A TREE LIMB.
THE AIRMAN STATED HE DID NOT REALIZE HE WAS AS CLOSE TO THE TREE AS HE ACTUALLY WAS AND THOUGHT HE WAS CLEAR OF ALL OBSTACLES. HE ALSO STATED THE ROTOR BLADES KICKED UP A LOT OF DUST FROM THE GROUND AND OBSTRUCTED HIS VISIBILITY OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
THE AIRMAN STATED HE INSPECTED THE ROTOR BLADE AFTER COMING IN CONTACT WITH THE TREE LIMB AND DETERMINED HE WAS ABLE TO TAKE OFF AGAIN. ONCE THE HELICOPTER RETURNED TO ITS BASE. THE AIRMAN, WHO IS THE COMPANY OWNER, HAD THE BLADES REPLACED AS THEY WERE COMING UP ON A REQUIRED INSPECTION ANYWAY. THE AIRMAN ALSO REPLACE OTHER PARTS UNRELATED TO THE INCIDENT AS THEY WERE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE NEXT INSPECTION.
AIRMAN RETURNED THE AIRCRAFT BACK TO SERVICE AFTER ITS REQUIRED INSPECTION WAS COMPLETED.
Other reports on N48MP · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.