What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
On January 18, 2022, a student pilot and instructor pilot were performing pattern work at max westheimer airport in Norman, Oklahoma when the propeller spinner cone departed the aircraft. Both pilots stated they did not see the spinner cone depart the aircraft but rather felt an unusual vibration and decided to land the aircraft. After landing and on inspection of the aircraft they noticed the spinner cone was missing and all that remained was the backing plate of the spinner cone. There was no other damage to the aircraft. The other portion of the spinner cone was later retrieved by airport personnel and there were what appeared to be evidence of metal stress fractures in the area of the spinner cone backing plate where it attached to the propeller. The damaged spinner cone backing plate was removed and the aircraft was returned to service. A review of the aircraft records did not indicate any recent maintenance had been performed in the area of the propeller or spinner cone and the annual inspection of this aircraft was current at the time of the incident.
As the FAA filed it
ON JANUARY 18, 2022, A STUDENT PILOT AND INSTRUCTOR PILOT WERE PERFORMING PATTERN WORK AT MAX WESTHEIMER AIRPORT IN NORMAN, OKLAHOMA WHEN THE PROPELLER SPINNER CONE DEPARTED THE AIRCRAFT. BOTH PILOTS STATED THEY DID NOT SEE THE SPINNER CONE DEPART THE AIRCRAFT BUT RATHER FELT AN UNUSUAL VIBRATION AND DECIDED TO LAND THE AIRCRAFT. AFTER LANDING AND ON INSPECTION OF THE AIRCRAFT THEY NOTICED THE SPINNER CONE WAS MISSING AND ALL THAT REMAINED WAS THE BACKING PLATE OF THE SPINNER CONE. THERE WAS NO OTHER DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT. THE OTHER PORTION OF THE SPINNER CONE WAS LATER RETRIEVED BY AIRPORT PERSONNEL AND THERE WERE WHAT APPEARED TO BE EVIDENCE OF METAL STRESS FRACTURES IN THE AREA OF THE SPINNER CONE BACKING PLATE WHERE IT ATTACHED TO THE PROPELLER. THE DAMAGED SPINNER CONE BACKING PLATE WAS REMOVED AND THE AIRCRAFT WAS RETURNED TO SERVICE. A REVIEW OF THE AIRCRAFT RECORDS DID NOT INDICATE ANY RECENT MAINTENANCE HAD BEEN PERFORMED IN THE AREA OF THE PROPELLER OR SPINNER CONE AND THE ANNUAL INSPECTION OF THIS AIRCRAFT WAS CURRENT AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT.