What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
privacy data omitted Iic-inspectors statement ? Incident investigation
Atqa no.: ASO1922023
Registration: N247LP
Ptrs: SO19
Make: Robinson
Model: R-44
Serial number: 13205
When: januay 22, 2022 1800 zulu
Where: Robinson R44, registration N247LP with one pilot and 2 passengers on board conducting a commercial air our northbound on the shore enroute to khwo North Perry Airport. N247LP struck an object initially thought to be a bird or a drone while in cruise along miami beach at approximately 300 feet. N247LP landed at North Perry Airport without incident and notified the FAA.
What: part 91 commercial airtour operation operated a Robinson R44, registration N247LP. Helicopter was operating VFR conducting commercial airtour operations.
Pilot - current and qualified
Medical certificate second class:current
Examination of the helicopter:
Helicopter N247LP had landed on the company dolly at hwo. There was minor damage to the helicopter fuselage below the windscreen. Substantial damage was ruled out in coordination with the NTSB. Aerospace engineers examined photos taken from the helicopter fuselage damage and determined the following:
?There is damage to the fiberglass skin, a support angle, and the floor below the right windshield from impact with an unknown object. None of these items are considered primary structure. The damage would not adversely affect the structural strength, performance, or flight characteristics. Therefore, this is not considered substantial damage.?
Miscellaneous:
On Saturday 1/22/2022, I received a call from the pilot who was PIC of N247LP, that struck an object while at altitude. The pilot of the R44 did not sustain any injuries, nor did the 2 passengers. Subsequent inspection of the aircraft did not appear to reflect and ?strange,? Blood, or feathers, typical at times for a bird strike. The pilot indicated that it might have been a drone.
Air traffic data was obtained for the flight regarding N247LP. Flight path data appeared to indicate a commercial air tour. No drone information in the form of a drone, operator, or any information was able to be correlated to the event. This incident is being closed with no further action because neither the UAS, nor the UAS operator were identified and there is insufficient evidence to pursue further investigation.
As the FAA filed it
^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ IIC-INSPECTORS STATEMENT ? INCIDENT INVESTIGATION
ATQA NO.: ASO1922023
REGISTRATION: N247LP
PTRS: SO19
MAKE: ROBINSON
MODEL: R-44
SERIAL NUMBER: 13205
WHEN: JANUAY 22, 2022 1800 ZULU
WHERE: ROBINSON R44, REGISTRATION N247LP WITH ONE PILOT AND 2 PASSENGERS ON BOARD CONDUCTING A COMMERCIAL AIR OUR NORTHBOUND ON THE SHORE ENROUTE TO KHWO NORTH PERRY AIRPORT. N247LP STRUCK AN OBJECT INITIALLY THOUGHT TO BE A BIRD OR A DRONE WHILE IN CRUISE ALONG MIAMI BEACH AT APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET. N247LP LANDED AT NORTH PERRY AIRPORT WITHOUT INCIDENT AND NOTIFIED THE FAA.
WHAT: PART 91 COMMERCIAL AIRTOUR OPERATION OPERATED A ROBINSON R44, REGISTRATION N247LP. HELICOPTER WAS OPERATING VFR CONDUCTING COMMERCIAL AIRTOUR OPERATIONS.
PILOT - CURRENT AND QUALIFIED
MEDICAL CERTIFICATE SECOND CLASS:CURRENT
EXAMINATION OF THE HELICOPTER:
HELICOPTER N247LP HAD LANDED ON THE COMPANY DOLLY AT HWO. THERE WAS MINOR DAMAGE TO THE HELICOPTER FUSELAGE BELOW THE WINDSCREEN. SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE WAS RULED OUT IN COORDINATION WITH THE NTSB. AEROSPACE ENGINEERS EXAMINED PHOTOS TAKEN FROM THE HELICOPTER FUSELAGE DAMAGE AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING:
?THERE IS DAMAGE TO THE FIBERGLASS SKIN, A SUPPORT ANGLE, AND THE FLOOR BELOW THE RIGHT WINDSHIELD FROM IMPACT WITH AN UNKNOWN OBJECT. NONE OF THESE ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED PRIMARY STRUCTURE. THE DAMAGE WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE STRUCTURAL STRENGTH, PERFORMANCE, OR FLIGHT CHARACTERISTICS. THEREFORE, THIS IS NOT CONSIDERED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE.?
MISCELLANEOUS:
ON SATURDAY 1/22/2022, I RECEIVED A CALL FROM THE PILOT WHO WAS PIC OF N247LP, THAT STRUCK AN OBJECT WHILE AT ALTITUDE. THE PILOT OF THE R44 DID NOT SUSTAIN ANY INJURIES, NOR DID THE 2 PASSENGERS. SUBSEQUENT INSPECTION OF THE AIRCRAFT DID NOT APPEAR TO REFLECT AND ?STRANGE,? BLOOD, OR FEATHERS, TYPICAL AT TIMES FOR A BIRD STRIKE. THE PILOT INDICATED THAT IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN A DRONE.
AIR TRAFFIC DATA WAS OBTAINED FOR THE FLIGHT REGARDING N247LP. FLIGHT PATH DATA APPEARED TO INDICATE A COMMERCIAL AIR TOUR. NO DRONE INFORMATION IN THE FORM OF A DRONE, OPERATOR, OR ANY INFORMATION WAS ABLE TO BE CORRELATED TO THE EVENT. THIS INCIDENT IS BEING CLOSED WITH NO FURTHER ACTION BECAUSE NEITHER THE UAS, NOR THE UAS OPERATOR WERE IDENTIFIED AND THERE IS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO PURSUE FURTHER INVESTIGATION.