20221001009409I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Sikorsky SK-64 · Central Point, OR · October 1, 2022

Date
October 1, 2022 · 15:00 local
Place
Central Point, OR
Airport
Medford
Phase of flight
Other, Specify
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Operator
E8KL
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N159AC
Reported as
Sikorsky SK-64
People aboard
3
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificates
Airline transport, flight instructor

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

The flight was maintenance related for a return to service validation. The portions of the flight leading to the incident were uneventful and the maintenance related tasks were satisfactory. The final flight check required hovering the aircraft near max gross weight. It was decided to utilize water in the fixed tank to accomplish this condition. This is a typical action to increase the weight of the aircraft for testing.

During a hover over the rogue river to fill the water tank, the PIC allowed the aircraft wheels to descend into the water. His control inputs to arrest this action resulted in the fuselage entering a slight nose high attitude thus causing the tail rotor to contact the river. Although the flight engineer could not see the tail rotor contact the river (his view was obstructed by the fixed tank), he saw a volume of water directed laterally from the surface of the river and felt a "thump" in the airframe. These indications combined with the wheels visibly being in the water, lead him to believe that the tail rotor contact the water. The crew decided to return to Medford Airport (kmfr) and park at their facility. During the flight back the flight crew noticed a vibration in the airframe. They landed at the airport without incident, shut down the engines, and inspected the aircraft. Follow up action and airman information pending this record will updated as an ammendment once information is availiable

As the FAA filed it

THE FLIGHT WAS MAINTENANCE RELATED FOR A RETURN TO SERVICE VALIDATION. THE PORTIONS OF THE FLIGHT LEADING TO THE INCIDENT WERE UNEVENTFUL AND THE MAINTENANCE RELATED TASKS WERE SATISFACTORY. THE FINAL FLIGHT CHECK REQUIRED HOVERING THE AIRCRAFT NEAR MAX GROSS WEIGHT. IT WAS DECIDED TO UTILIZE WATER IN THE FIXED TANK TO ACCOMPLISH THIS CONDITION. THIS IS A TYPICAL ACTION TO INCREASE THE WEIGHT OF THE AIRCRAFT FOR TESTING.

DURING A HOVER OVER THE ROGUE RIVER TO FILL THE WATER TANK, THE PIC ALLOWED THE AIRCRAFT WHEELS TO DESCEND INTO THE WATER. HIS CONTROL INPUTS TO ARREST THIS ACTION RESULTED IN THE FUSELAGE ENTERING A SLIGHT NOSE HIGH ATTITUDE THUS CAUSING THE TAIL ROTOR TO CONTACT THE RIVER. ALTHOUGH THE FLIGHT ENGINEER COULD NOT SEE THE TAIL ROTOR CONTACT THE RIVER (HIS VIEW WAS OBSTRUCTED BY THE FIXED TANK), HE SAW A VOLUME OF WATER DIRECTED LATERALLY FROM THE SURFACE OF THE RIVER AND FELT A "THUMP" IN THE AIRFRAME. THESE INDICATIONS COMBINED WITH THE WHEELS VISIBLY BEING IN THE WATER, LEAD HIM TO BELIEVE THAT THE TAIL ROTOR CONTACT THE WATER. THE CREW DECIDED TO RETURN TO MEDFORD AIRPORT (KMFR) AND PARK AT THEIR FACILITY. DURING THE FLIGHT BACK THE FLIGHT CREW NOTICED A VIBRATION IN THE AIRFRAME. THEY LANDED AT THE AIRPORT WITHOUT INCIDENT, SHUT DOWN THE ENGINES, AND INSPECTED THE AIRCRAFT. FOLLOW UP ACTION AND AIRMAN INFORMATION PENDING THIS RECORD WILL UPDATED AS AN AMMENDMENT ONCE INFORMATION IS AVAILIABLE