20230223001939I

Incident · No damage

FAA incident report · Cessna 208B · Anchorage, AK · February 23, 2023

Date
February 23, 2023 · 10:28 local
Place
Anchorage, AK
Airport
Ted Stevens Anchorage International
Phase of flight
Landing: Approach
Operating rules
Air taxi and commuter (Part 135)
Operator
ENHA
Damage
No damage
Aircraft
N1296Y
Reported as
Cessna 208B
Reported engine
Pratt & Whitney PT6A series
People aboard
8
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Commercial pilot
Pilot’s flight hours
1,300 total

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Asap accepted.

Suspected auto-pilot failure when intercepting the localizer for landing, (all controls became stiff and the aircraft went into a nose down attitude losing altitude and difficult to control the aircraft). Tower requested altitude check and provided vectors for a second landing attempt. The pilot recovered the aircraft and landed on the second attempt.

The certificate holder had an appropriately rated repair station test and evaluate the autopilot system. No discrepancies were noted, however the GMC-605 autopilot controller was replaced as a precautionary measure.

The certificate holder concluded the internal tap-root investigation interview with the pilot and the evaluation of the auto-pilot parameters, manufactures testing report, obtained from the repair station.

The certificate holder was unable to conclusively determine the causal factors of the event to attribute pilot error or system failure.

The GMC-605 auto-pilot controller has been replaced and no further auto-pilot discrepancies have been noted. No regulatory violation can be noted. The maintenance corrective actions taken by the certificate holder and mitigation of future occurrences have been satisfactorily met.

As the FAA filed it

ASAP ACCEPTED.

SUSPECTED AUTO-PILOT FAILURE WHEN INTERCEPTING THE LOCALIZER FOR LANDING, (ALL CONTROLS BECAME STIFF AND THE AIRCRAFT WENT INTO A NOSE DOWN ATTITUDE LOSING ALTITUDE AND DIFFICULT TO CONTROL THE AIRCRAFT). TOWER REQUESTED ALTITUDE CHECK AND PROVIDED VECTORS FOR A SECOND LANDING ATTEMPT. THE PILOT RECOVERED THE AIRCRAFT AND LANDED ON THE SECOND ATTEMPT.

THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER HAD AN APPROPRIATELY RATED REPAIR STATION TEST AND EVALUATE THE AUTOPILOT SYSTEM. NO DISCREPANCIES WERE NOTED, HOWEVER THE GMC-605 AUTOPILOT CONTROLLER WAS REPLACED AS A PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE.

THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER CONCLUDED THE INTERNAL TAP-ROOT INVESTIGATION INTERVIEW WITH THE PILOT AND THE EVALUATION OF THE AUTO-PILOT PARAMETERS, MANUFACTURES TESTING REPORT, OBTAINED FROM THE REPAIR STATION.

THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER WAS UNABLE TO CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINE THE CAUSAL FACTORS OF THE EVENT TO ATTRIBUTE PILOT ERROR OR SYSTEM FAILURE.

THE GMC-605 AUTO-PILOT CONTROLLER HAS BEEN REPLACED AND NO FURTHER AUTO-PILOT DISCREPANCIES HAVE BEEN NOTED. NO REGULATORY VIOLATION CAN BE NOTED. THE MAINTENANCE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER AND MITIGATION OF FUTURE OCCURRENCES HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY MET.

Other reports on N1296Y · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.