20230607015839A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Vans RV-6 · Colonial Beach, VA · June 7, 2023

Date
June 7, 2023 · 06:27 local
Place
Colonial Beach, VA
Phase of flight
Maneuver
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N835BC
NTSB investigation
NTSBERA23FA260
Reported as
Vans RV-6
Reported engine
Lycoming IO-320 series
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
2
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Private pilot

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Two witnesses independently observed the crash, and their observations were materially the same. They stated that first the pilot performed a simple “fly-by” near the first witness' house, approximately straight-and-level. Then the plane returned, and this time banked at a sharp angle, estimated to be knife-edged or nearly so, to make a tight bank in a counterclockwise circle around the house, at an altitude estimated to between two and three tree heights above the ground, approximately 200-300 feet AGL. Near the end of the observation, the top (right) wing rolled inverted, the plane rapidly rolled/pitched into a near-vertical dive, crashed through trees along the driveway, and smashed nose-first onto the witness' property. The second witness was the privacy data omitted where the plane spent the night, and has "thousands of hours" in the same make of airplane. Neither witness recalled hearing any change in the engine pitch or noise. Investigation of the wreckage did not reveal any defects. The medical examiner found no known medical conditions that could pose hazards to flight safety.

As the FAA filed it

TWO WITNESSES INDEPENDENTLY OBSERVED THE CRASH, AND THEIR OBSERVATIONS WERE MATERIALLY THE SAME. THEY STATED THAT FIRST THE PILOT PERFORMED A SIMPLE “FLY-BY” NEAR THE FIRST WITNESS' HOUSE, APPROXIMATELY STRAIGHT-AND-LEVEL. THEN THE PLANE RETURNED, AND THIS TIME BANKED AT A SHARP ANGLE, ESTIMATED TO BE KNIFE-EDGED OR NEARLY SO, TO MAKE A TIGHT BANK IN A COUNTERCLOCKWISE CIRCLE AROUND THE HOUSE, AT AN ALTITUDE ESTIMATED TO BETWEEN TWO AND THREE TREE HEIGHTS ABOVE THE GROUND, APPROXIMATELY 200-300 FEET AGL. NEAR THE END OF THE OBSERVATION, THE TOP (RIGHT) WING ROLLED INVERTED, THE PLANE RAPIDLY ROLLED/PITCHED INTO A NEAR-VERTICAL DIVE, CRASHED THROUGH TREES ALONG THE DRIVEWAY, AND SMASHED NOSE-FIRST ONTO THE WITNESS' PROPERTY. THE SECOND WITNESS WAS THE ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ WHERE THE PLANE SPENT THE NIGHT, AND HAS "THOUSANDS OF HOURS" IN THE SAME MAKE OF AIRPLANE. NEITHER WITNESS RECALLED HEARING ANY CHANGE IN THE ENGINE PITCH OR NOISE. INVESTIGATION OF THE WRECKAGE DID NOT REVEAL ANY DEFECTS. THE MEDICAL EXAMINER FOUND NO KNOWN MEDICAL CONDITIONS THAT COULD POSE HAZARDS TO FLIGHT SAFETY.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.