20231214018579I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Cessna 172N · Xenia, OH · December 14, 2023

Date
December 14, 2023 · 13:56 local
Place
Xenia, OH
Phase of flight
Cruise/Level Flight
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N733GL
Reported as
Cessna 172N
Reported engine
Lycoming 0-320 series
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Private pilot
Pilot’s flight hours
221 total

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

The pilot experienced a partial power loss and reported to columbus (cmh) TRACON and was given vectors towards a private airport. Due to the power loss and performance at best glide, the pilot was concerned he would not make it to the airport and opted to perform an off-airport landing in a plowed farm field. Based on the jpi engine analyzer information, the engine rotation stopped about the time the pilot was in the flare. The aircraft touched down and during the rollout, the nose gear began to dig in to the plowed soil. As the aircraft lost forward progress, it “wheel-barrowed” to the right, where the spinner and right prop blade made contact with the ground as well as the right wingtip resulting in minor skin damage to the cowling and along the leading edge of the right wing, slightly inboard of the wing cap. The aircraft then returned to rest on all three main landing gears at 39° 41’ 14”n, 83° 49’ 58”w on a 246° heading.

Inspection by the aircraft privacy data omitted/mechanic did not reveal any damage to the firewall or wing spar. On further inspection by the privacy data omitted/mechanic and an airworthiness inspector from our office, both points of the magneto were closed due to magneto bearing wear causing heat which melted the point cam followers, causing magneto failure.

As the FAA filed it

THE PILOT EXPERIENCED A PARTIAL POWER LOSS AND REPORTED TO COLUMBUS (CMH) TRACON AND WAS GIVEN VECTORS TOWARDS A PRIVATE AIRPORT. DUE TO THE POWER LOSS AND PERFORMANCE AT BEST GLIDE, THE PILOT WAS CONCERNED HE WOULD NOT MAKE IT TO THE AIRPORT AND OPTED TO PERFORM AN OFF-AIRPORT LANDING IN A PLOWED FARM FIELD. BASED ON THE JPI ENGINE ANALYZER INFORMATION, THE ENGINE ROTATION STOPPED ABOUT THE TIME THE PILOT WAS IN THE FLARE. THE AIRCRAFT TOUCHED DOWN AND DURING THE ROLLOUT, THE NOSE GEAR BEGAN TO DIG IN TO THE PLOWED SOIL. AS THE AIRCRAFT LOST FORWARD PROGRESS, IT “WHEEL-BARROWED” TO THE RIGHT, WHERE THE SPINNER AND RIGHT PROP BLADE MADE CONTACT WITH THE GROUND AS WELL AS THE RIGHT WINGTIP RESULTING IN MINOR SKIN DAMAGE TO THE COWLING AND ALONG THE LEADING EDGE OF THE RIGHT WING, SLIGHTLY INBOARD OF THE WING CAP. THE AIRCRAFT THEN RETURNED TO REST ON ALL THREE MAIN LANDING GEARS AT 39° 41’ 14”N, 83° 49’ 58”W ON A 246° HEADING.

INSPECTION BY THE AIRCRAFT ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^/MECHANIC DID NOT REVEAL ANY DAMAGE TO THE FIREWALL OR WING SPAR. ON FURTHER INSPECTION BY THE ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^/MECHANIC AND AN AIRWORTHINESS INSPECTOR FROM OUR OFFICE, BOTH POINTS OF THE MAGNETO WERE CLOSED DUE TO MAGNETO BEARING WEAR CAUSING HEAT WHICH MELTED THE POINT CAM FOLLOWERS, CAUSING MAGNETO FAILURE.