20241109019919A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Schweizer 269C-1 · Boalsburg, PA · November 9, 2024

Date
November 9, 2024 · 09:30 local
Place
Boalsburg, PA
Phase of flight
Cruise/Level Flight
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N504JN
NTSB investigation
NTSBERA25LA044
Reported as
Schweizer 269C-1
Reported engine
Lycoming HO-360-C1A
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Private pilot
Pilot’s flight hours
258 total

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Pilot departed home location enroute to kunv FBO with all instruments in the green. The pilot picked up a passenger with a destination at krvl. Departure was to the southeast with a slow climb to clear the mountain. The pilot applied carb heat due to temperature and dew point. As the pilot approached the mountain, he increased throttle and collective, he then heard an engine noise that was not identifyable. The engine then backfired and did not produce enough power to clear the high side of the mountain. The pilot elected to go over the low side of the mountain. The pilot noticed a housing development cul de sac with no power remaining. The tail rotor hit an embankment and the pilot shut the aircraft down and he and the passenger evacuated the aircraft.

Damage included the tail rotor blades, a hole in the tail boom, 90 degree gearbox and both front and rear crosstubes bent.

There were no airworthiness issues found with the engine during the investigation. As a result, carburator icing may still have caused the loss of power even when the pilot appropriately applied carburator heat.

As the FAA filed it

PILOT DEPARTED HOME LOCATION ENROUTE TO KUNV FBO WITH ALL INSTRUMENTS IN THE GREEN. THE PILOT PICKED UP A PASSENGER WITH A DESTINATION AT KRVL. DEPARTURE WAS TO THE SOUTHEAST WITH A SLOW CLIMB TO CLEAR THE MOUNTAIN. THE PILOT APPLIED CARB HEAT DUE TO TEMPERATURE AND DEW POINT. AS THE PILOT APPROACHED THE MOUNTAIN, HE INCREASED THROTTLE AND COLLECTIVE, HE THEN HEARD AN ENGINE NOISE THAT WAS NOT IDENTIFYABLE. THE ENGINE THEN BACKFIRED AND DID NOT PRODUCE ENOUGH POWER TO CLEAR THE HIGH SIDE OF THE MOUNTAIN. THE PILOT ELECTED TO GO OVER THE LOW SIDE OF THE MOUNTAIN.THE PILOT NOTICED A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CUL DE SAC WITH NO POWER REMAINING. THE TAIL ROTOR HIT AN EMBANKMENT AND THE PILOT SHUT THE AIRCRAFT DOWN AND HE AND THE PASSENGER EVACUATED THE AIRCRAFT.

DAMAGE INCLUDED THE TAIL ROTOR BLADES, A HOLE IN THE TAIL BOOM, 90 DEGREE GEARBOX AND BOTH FRONT AND REAR CROSSTUBES BENT.

THERE WERE NO AIRWORTHINESS ISSUES FOUND WITH THE ENGINE DURING THE INVESTIGATION. AS A RESULT, CARBURATOR ICING MAY STILL HAVE CAUSED THE LOSS OF POWER EVEN WHEN THE PILOT APPROPRIATELY APPLIED CARBURATOR HEAT.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.