20250112000529A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Bellanca 7GCBC · Batesville, AR · January 12, 2025

Date
January 12, 2025 · 15:53 local
Place
Batesville, AR
Phase of flight
Maneuver
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N8569V
NTSB investigation
NTSBCEN25LA075
Reported as
Bellanca 7GCBC
Reported engine
Lycoming 0-320 series
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
1
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Private pilot
Pilot’s flight hours
2,500 total

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

The aircraft involved in the accident was engaged in a sightseeing flight when it collided with power lines located five miles north of Batesville, Arkansas. This aircraft was accompanied by a second airplane, which was positioned approximately a quarter mile behind and above the accident aircraft. During the flight, the pilot and passenger of the second aircraft remarked, “wow, he is really low in the valley.” roughly ten seconds after this observation, the accident aircraft struck the power lines, resulting in a dramatic display of high-voltage blue sparks as it became entangled in the lines suspended 137 feet above the ground. Following the incident, the pilot of the second aircraft returned to Batesville regional airport and then traveled back to the scene by vehicle. Upon arrival, he spoke with the pilot of the accident aircraft, who explained that he had not seen the wires until it was too late, largely due to the snowy background obscuring visibility. Tragically, during the rescue efforts, the pilot of the accident aircraft fell from his climbing harness and sustained fatal injuries. The pilot of the second aircraft later reported in his witness statement that neither he nor his passenger noticed any loss of engine power prior to the collision. The federal aviation administration (FAA) arrived at the scene after the aircraft was removed from the power lines, and investigators confirmed the continuity of flight controls and the presence of adequate fuel on board, finding no indications of a power plant failure. The accident cause has been classified as controlled flight into terrain (cfit).

As the FAA filed it

THE AIRCRAFT INVOLVED IN THE ACCIDENT WAS ENGAGED IN A SIGHTSEEING FLIGHT WHEN IT COLLIDED WITH POWER LINES LOCATED FIVE MILES NORTH OF BATESVILLE, ARKANSAS. THIS AIRCRAFT WAS ACCOMPANIED BY A SECOND AIRPLANE, WHICH WAS POSITIONED APPROXIMATELY A QUARTER MILE BEHIND AND ABOVE THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT. DURING THE FLIGHT, THE PILOT AND PASSENGER OF THE SECOND AIRCRAFT REMARKED, “WOW, HE IS REALLY LOW IN THE VALLEY.” ROUGHLY TEN SECONDS AFTER THIS OBSERVATION, THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT STRUCK THE POWER LINES, RESULTING IN A DRAMATIC DISPLAY OF HIGH-VOLTAGE BLUE SPARKS AS IT BECAME ENTANGLED IN THE LINES SUSPENDED 137 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND. FOLLOWING THE INCIDENT, THE PILOT OF THE SECOND AIRCRAFT RETURNED TO BATESVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT AND THEN TRAVELED BACK TO THE SCENE BY VEHICLE. UPON ARRIVAL, HE SPOKE WITH THE PILOT OF THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT, WHO EXPLAINED THAT HE HAD NOT SEEN THE WIRES UNTIL IT WAS TOO LATE, LARGELY DUE TO THE SNOWY BACKGROUND OBSCURING VISIBILITY. TRAGICALLY, DURING THE RESCUE EFFORTS, THE PILOT OF THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT FELL FROM HIS CLIMBING HARNESS AND SUSTAINED FATAL INJURIES. THE PILOT OF THE SECOND AIRCRAFT LATER REPORTED IN HIS WITNESS STATEMENT THAT NEITHER HE NOR HIS PASSENGER NOTICED ANY LOSS OF ENGINE POWER PRIOR TO THE COLLISION. THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) ARRIVED AT THE SCENE AFTER THE AIRCRAFT WAS REMOVED FROM THE POWER LINES, AND INVESTIGATORS CONFIRMED THE CONTINUITY OF FLIGHT CONTROLS AND THE PRESENCE OF ADEQUATE FUEL ON BOARD, FINDING NO INDICATIONS OF A POWER PLANT FAILURE. THE ACCIDENT CAUSE HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED AS CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN (CFIT).

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.