20250328009909A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Vans RV-12 · Chesterfield, VA · March 28, 2025

Date
March 28, 2025 · 14:27 local
Place
Chesterfield, VA
Airport
Richmond Exec-Chesterfield Cou
Phase of flight
Landing: Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N4754
NTSB investigation
NTSBERA25LA191
Reported as
Vans RV-12
Reported engine
ROTAX 912ULS series
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Private pilot
Pilot’s flight hours
300 total162 in this make and model1 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

The plane, which hadn't flown in several months, launched from runway 15 on his first takeoff, flew the traffic pattern, and was making his first landing. The pilot said that the plane descended unexpectedly and rapidly, striking nose-first, which caused the nose wheel and axle to depart the nose strut (which remained intact), and one propeller blade to be damaged while the other snapped at its root and departed. A taxiway exit was nearby and he was able to guide the plane off the runway. Post crash fire resulted in substantial damage. Complicating the accident was that, during post accendent inspection, FAA inspectors noted that the aircraft id not have a current condition inspection. Also, it was noted that the push-pull rod on the elevator trim tab was snapped, though the pilot could not say if it was before or after the accident, due to inadequate preflight. Investiation showed the fire was a result of the carborators not secure allowing fuel to spray inside the cowlings after the impact which caused the post accident fire.

As the FAA filed it

THE PLANE, WHICH HADN'T FLOWN IN SEVERAL MONTHS, LAUNCHED FROM RUNWAY 15 ON HIS FIRST TAKEOFF, FLEW THE TRAFFIC PATTERN, AND WAS MAKING HIS FIRST LANDING. THE PILOT SAID THAT THE PLANE DESCENDED UNEXPECTEDLY AND RAPIDLY, STRIKING NOSE-FIRST, WHICH CAUSED THE NOSE WHEEL AND AXLE TO DEPART THE NOSE STRUT (WHICH REMAINED INTACT), AND ONE PROPELLER BLADE TO BE DAMAGED WHILE THE OTHER SNAPPED AT ITS ROOT AND DEPARTED. A TAXIWAY EXIT WAS NEARBY AND HE WAS ABLE TO GUIDE THE PLANE OFF THE RUNWAY. POST CRASH FIRE RESULTED IN SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. COMPLICATING THE ACCIDENT WAS THAT, DURING POST ACCENDENT INSPECTION, FAA INSPECTORS NOTED THAT THE AIRCRAFT ID NOT HAVE A CURRENT CONDITION INSPECTION. ALSO, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PUSH-PULL ROD ON THE ELEVATOR TRIM TAB WAS SNAPPED, THOUGH THE PILOT COULD NOT SAY IF IT WAS BEFORE OR AFTER THE ACCIDENT, DUE TO INADEQUATE PREFLIGHT. INVESTIATION SHOWED THE FIRE WAS A RESULT OF THE CARBORATORS NOT SECURE ALLOWING FUEL TO SPRAY INSIDE THE COWLINGS AFTER THE IMPACT WHICH CAUSED THE POST ACCIDENT FIRE.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.