What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Pilot performed a visual approach at Victoria Regional Airport. A weather observation taken shortly after the incident showed a crosswind factor of 6 knots, gusting to 16 knots. According to the pilot this amount of crosswind exceeded his skill level. According to the pilot he mismanaged the controls during his approach to landing. After bouncing once, the aircraft touched down in an uncoordinated nose-down attitude. The oblique forces placed on the nosewheel casued by the hard landing and touchdown angle caused the shock/strut assembly to separate from the airframe. The aircraft came to rest shortly after the nosewheel landing gear structural failure and subsequest propeller strike with the ground.
As the FAA filed it
PILOT PERFORMED A VISUAL APPROACH AT VICTORIA REGIONAL AIRPORT. A WEATHER OBSERVATION TAKEN SHORTLY AFTER THE INCIDENT SHOWED A CROSSWIND FACTOR OF 6 KNOTS, GUSTING TO 16 KNOTS. ACCORDING TO THE PILOT THIS AMOUNT OF CROSSWIND EXCEEDED HIS SKILL LEVEL. ACCORDING TO THE PILOT HE MISMANAGED THE CONTROLS DURING HIS APPROACH TO LANDING. AFTER BOUNCING ONCE, THE AIRCRAFT TOUCHED DOWN IN AN UNCOORDINATED NOSE-DOWN ATTITUDE. THE OBLIQUE FORCES PLACED ON THE NOSEWHEEL CASUED BY THE HARD LANDING AND TOUCHDOWN ANGLE CAUSED THE SHOCK/STRUT ASSEMBLY TO SEPARATE FROM THE AIRFRAME. THE AIRCRAFT CAME TO REST SHORTLY AFTER THE NOSEWHEEL LANDING GEAR STRUCTURAL FAILURE AND SUBSEQUEST PROPELLER STRIKE WITH THE GROUND.