ANC20CA014

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172 · Tokyo, Japan · December 15, 2019

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
December 15, 2019
Place
Tokyo, Japan
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Taxi
Aircraft
N22905Cessna 172
Defining event
Taxi-to runway: Prop/jet/rotor blast/suction
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report June 29, 2020
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
Alaska Regional Office
Case key
100807

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The airplane’s encounter with prop wash while taxiing behind a larger airplane that was conducting a high-power engine run on the same taxiway. Contributing to the accident was the air traffic controller’s failure to inform the smaller airplane’s pilot about the larger airplane pilot’s intentions.

Findings · 3

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Performance/control parameters: directional controlAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Attain/maintain not possibleCessna 172M: 59 casesAll aircraft: 3,958 casesProbable cause
Environmental issuesEnvironmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena · Effect on operationCessna 172M: 1 caseAll aircraft: 57 casesProbable cause
Communication (personnel): lack of communicationPersonnel issues › Task performance · ATC personnelCessna 172M: 1 caseAll aircraft: 84 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The operator's operations chief reported that an air traffic controller instructed the flight instructor and pilot to taxi to a taxiway and that, subsequently, the airplane encountered prop wash from a larger airplane on the same taxiway, which flipped the airplane onto its right side and resulted in substantial damage to the forward wing spar. The larger airplane's pilot reported that he was conducting a high-power engine run on the same taxiway. The air traffic controller did not tell the pilots in the smaller airplane at any time while they were taxiing about the larger airplane's intentions. The pilot of the larger airplane reported that all requests for engine start, taxi, and high-power engine runs were coordinated with air traffic control (ATC). He added that they had to reposition due to a tailwind and that he had made a radio call to ATC and acknowledged that they had repositioned on the ramp to face into the wind. He added that he heard the lighter airplane receive a taxi clearance but did not hear any communications questioning the larger airplane's status or position with respect to any potential impact on aircraft taxiing behind them on the taxiway. He became aware of the lighter airplane's situation after the event when its pilot made a radio call to ground control.

Factual narrative

The Aero Club operations chief reported that, the flight instructor and pilot were on a taxiway under air traffic control (ATC) instruction, the airplane encountered prop wash, originating from a larger (twin engine) turbine-powered airplane performing a maintenance engine(s) run-up. The maintenance run-up was performed in a location adjacent to the active taxiway. The light single-engine airplane was not told by ATC at any time during their taxi of the larger turbine-powered airplane's intentions. Subsequently, the light single-engine airplane was blown from its location while taxing behind the larger turbine-powered airplane, which resulted in substantial damage to the forward wing-spar. The Aero Club operations chief reported that there were no preimpact mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation. The pilot of the larger turbine-powered airplane reported that, all requests for engine start, taxi, and high power runs were coordinated with ATC. He added that they had to reposition due to tailwinds, however a radio call was made to ATC and acknowledged that they had repositioned on the ramp to face into the wind. He added that he heard the light single-engine airplane receive a taxi clearance but did not hear any communications questioning the larger turbine-powered airplane's status or position with respect to any potential impact on aircraft taxiing behind them on the taxiway. He became aware of the light single-engine airplane's situation after the event when the pilot of the light single-engine airplane made a radio call to ground control.

Aircraft

Registration
N22905
Reported as
Cessna 172 (M)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
17264078
Built
1974
Airframe hours
9,142.7
Engine
Lycoming O-360-A4M, 180 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Operator
Yokota Aero Club
Registered owner
Yokota Aero Club
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · December 12, 2019
Flight plan
Company VFR
Airport
RJTY · Yokota Air Base
Equipment
Electronic flight bag or handheld device, Electronic multifunction display, Electronic primary flight display, Stall warning system, ADS-B, Angle of attack indicator, Auto-pilot

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Flight instructor
Age
40
Injuries
None
Certificates
Commercial, Flight instructor
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 2, With waivers/limitations
Seat
Right
Restraint
4-point
Flight hours
697 total · 227 in this make and model
Role
Pilot
Age
29
Injuries
None
Certificates
Military, Commercial
Instrument ratings
Helicopter
Medical
Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
Seat
Left
Restraint
4-point
Flight hours
671 total · 51 in this make and model

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
50° at 8 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
50 °F, dew point 25 °F
Altimeter
30.32 inHg
Observed at
RJTY, 1 nm away

Docket · 3

The files NTSB released with the investigation on April 15, 2020, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 1.1 MB in all.