- Date
- June 29, 2011, 14:30 local (19:30 UTC)
- Place
- Burlington, WI
- Injuries
- 1 serious
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Phase of flight
- Initial climb
- Aircraft
- N2332VCessna 140
- Defining event
- Initial climb: Fuel starvation
- Weather
- Visual (VMC) · Day
- Status
- Completed · report May 3, 2012
- Report
- Approved by Office Director
- NTSB office
- Central Region
- Parties
- Milwaukee FSDO
- FAA report
- 20110629013069A
- Case key
- 80992
From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.
On this page
Probable cause
The improper installation of the fuel selector indicator handle, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation.
Findings · 3
NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.
Sequence of events
The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.
Analysis
The pilot reported that he departed with the fuel selector set to the right fuel tank, which was full of fuel. About 30 minutes after departure, he made a touch-and-go landing and takeoff at his destination airport. During the initial climb, the engine started to lose power when the airplane was about 100 feet above the runway. The pilot entered a left turn and attempted to land on an adjacent grass runway, but the airplane impacted the terrain short of the runway. Postaccident examination of the airplane’s fuel system revealed that the left fuel tank was empty and the right fuel tank was full of fuel. Examination of the airplane’s fuel selector revealed that the fuel selector indicator handle was improperly installed. When the fuel selector indicator handle was placed in the right fuel tank position, the fuel was actually coming from the left fuel tank. There was no record in the airplane’s maintenance logbook that indicated replacement of the fuel selector valve, the fuel selector indicator handle, or the fuel selector placard. It was not determined who performed the maintenance on the fuel selector and had improperly installed the fuel selector indicator handle.
Factual narrative
On June 29, 2011, about 1430 central daylight time, a Cessna 140, N2332V, sustained substantial damage during a forced landing after a loss of engine power during the initial climb from runway 11 (4,300 feet by 75 feet, asphalt) at the Burlington Municipal Airport (BUU), Burlington, Wisconsin. The pilot received serious injuries. The airplane was registered to Stick and Rudder LLC and operated by the pilot on a personal flight under the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The flight originated from the Kenosha Regional Airport (ENW), Kenosha, Wisconsin, about 1400. The pilot reported he departed ENW and flew to BUU and did a touch-and-go landing on runway 11. After he started the initial climb from the touch-and-go landing, the engine started to lose power when the airplane was about 100 feet above the runway. The pilot determined that there was not enough runway remaining to land on runway 11. He entered a left turn and attempted to land on runway 19, which was a grass runway, but the airplane impacted the terrain short of the runway. The airplane landed hard on the left wheel and then on the right wheel, which resulted in substantial damage to the airplane. A Federal Aviation Administration airworthiness inspector examined the airplane. The inspection revealed that the fuel selector handle indicated that the right fuel tank was selected. However, the right tank was full of fuel, and the fuel gauge located in the right wing root above the pilot also indicated that the right tank was full. The left fuel tank was empty, and the fuel gauge located in the left wing root above the pilot also indicated that the left tank was empty. The examination of the fuel selector revealed that the fuel selector placard complied with the airplane’s operations manual. However, the inspection revealed that the fuel selector indicator handle was improperly installed. When the fuel selector indicator handle was placed on the right fuel tank, the fuel was actually coming from the left fuel tank. The pilot reported that he departed with the fuel selector set to the right tank, and that he did not switch tanks during the flight. The airplane was purchased by a flying club from a private owner. The private owner reported that he bought the airplane in 1990. The fuel placard that came with the airplane at that time did not comply with the placard found in the airplane’s operations manual. Although the blue/grey colored placard was not the same as the one found in the operations manual, it did work. The previous owner reported that when he was preparing to sell the airplane to the flying club, he decided to make a fuel selector placard that was identical to the one found in the operations manual. He reported that he made the placard and provided it to the mechanic of the flying club so that the mechanic could install it. However, the mechanic at the flying club reported that he did not install thefuel selector placard, and that the previous owner had installed it prior to the airplane being purchased. There was no record in the airplane’s maintenance logbook that indicated when, or by whom, the fuel selector placard was replaced. The pilot held a private pilot certificate with single-engine land and single-engine sea ratings. He reported that he had approximately 4,000 total flight hours with 10 hours in make and model. His last medical was on April 4, 2008, and his last biennial flight review was conducted on September 15, 2008. The pilot indicated on the National Transportation Safety Board’s accident report form that his medical certificate was his “Driver’s License (Sport Pilot only).” The Cessna 140’s maximum gross weight is 1,450 pounds, which exceeds the light-sport airplane maximum gross weight limitation of 1,320 pounds.
Aircraft
- Registration
- N2332V
- Reported as
- Cessna 140
- Category
- Airplane
- Serial number
- 14568
- Airframe hours
- 4,748
- Engine
- Continental C-90-12F, 90 horsepower, reciprocating
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal · Part 91
- Operator
- Stick and Rudder
- Registered owner
- Stick and Rudder
- Airworthiness certificate
- Standard, Normal
- Last inspection
- Annual · September 3, 2010
- Departed
- ENW · Kenosha, WI
- Destination
- BUU · Burlington, WI
- Airport
- BUU · Burlington Municipal Airport, runway 19, 2,410 × 130 ft, grass/turf
Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.
Flight crew
As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.
- Role
- Pilot
- Age
- 82
- Injuries
- Serious
- Certificate
- Private
- Airplane ratings
- Single-engine sea, Single-engine land
- Medical
- Sport pilot
- Last flight review
- September 15, 2008
- Seat
- Left
- Flight hours
- 4,000 total · 10 in this make and model · 50 in the last 90 days · 15 in the last 30 days
Weather
- Conditions
- Visual (VMC) · Day
- Wind
- 100° at 8 knots
- Visibility
- 10 statute miles
- Lowest ceiling
- None
- Temperature
- 75 °F, dew point 55 °F
- Altimeter
- 30.07 inHg
- Observed at
- BUU
Docket · 10
The files NTSB released with the investigation on April 2, 2012, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 13.0 MB in all.
FAA reports on this event · 1
The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.