CEN22FA223

NTSB accident investigation · Aeronca 7AC · Bowling Green, MO · June 2, 2022

Accident · FatalClass 3 · FieldFinal report
Date
June 2, 2022, 17:45 local (22:45 UTC)
Place
Bowling Green, MO
Injuries
2 fatal
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Maneuvering
Aircraft
N1976EAeronca 7AC
Defining event
Maneuvering-low-alt flying: Loss of control in flight
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 3
NTSB office
Central Region
Parties
FAA
FAA report
20220602009269A
Case key
105180

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The pilots’ failure to maintain adequate airspeed while maneuvering, which resulted in an exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack and an aerodynamic stall.

Findings · 3

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Use of equip/info: aircraft controlPersonnel issues › Task performance · Flight crewAeronca 7AC: 43 casesAll aircraft: 9,295 casesProbable cause
Performance/control parameters: airspeedAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedAeronca 7AC: 10 casesAll aircraft: 1,681 casesProbable cause
Performance/control parameters: angle of attackAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Capability exceededAeronca 7AC: 7 casesAll aircraft: 990 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

Two pilots were conducting a local flight to practice basic agricultural flight maneuvers. A witness observed the airplane enter a right turn at low altitude, during which the right wing dropped, and the airplane nosed down toward terrain and disappeared from his view. The airplane impacted terrain in a nose- and left-wing-low attitude in a field. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage, wings, and empennage. A postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The airplane damage was consistent with a near-vertical descent, indicative of an aerodynamic stall. It could not be determined which of the two pilots was flying the airplane at the time of the accident. The circumstances of the accident are consistent with the pilots’ failure to maintain sufficient airspeed while maneuvering, which resulted in an exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack and an aerodynamic stall.

Factual narrative

According to the FAA Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3C): At the same gross weight, airplane configuration, CG location, power setting, and environmental conditions, a given airplane will consistently stalls at the same indicated airspeed provided the airplane is at +1G (i.e., steady state unaccelerated flight). However, the airplane can also stall at a higher indicated airspeed when the airplane is subject to an acceleration greater than +1G, such as when turning, pulling up, or other abrupt changes in flightpath. Stalls encountered any time the G-load exceeds +1G are called “accelerated maneuver stalls. The accelerated stall would most frequently occur inadvertently during improperly executed turns, stall and spin recoveries, pullouts from steep dives, or when overshooting a base to final turn. An accelerated stall is typically demonstrated during steep turns. On June 2, 2022, about 1745 central daylight time, an Aeronca 7AC, N1976E, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident near Bowling Green, Missouri. The two pilots sustained fatal injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. According to the airplane owner, the two pilots were planning to conduct a local flight to practice basic agricultural flight maneuvers. A witness, located in his residence about ½ mile from the accident site, reported that he saw the airplane at low altitude flying from the south to the north. The airplane then made a right turn to the east. During the turn, the right wing dropped, and the airplane nosed down toward the ground. The witness lost sight of the airplane behind some trees and located the airplane wreckage in a field adjacent to his residence. The witness stated that he had observed the airplane performing similar flight maneuvers over the nearby fields during the weeks before the accident. The front-seat pilot held a commercial pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single- and multi-engine land, airplane single-engine sea, and instrument airplane. The rear-seat pilot held a private pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine land and instrument airplane. Postaccident examination of the accident site revealed that the airplane impacted the terrain in a nose- and left-wing-low attitude. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage, wings, and empennage. The left wing was separated from the fuselage by rescue personnel to facilitate recovery efforts. The vertical stabilizer and tail were twisted to the left, consistent with a counterclockwise stall/spin at the time of impact. (See Figure 1.) Figure 1. Airplane wreckage (left wing removed from fuselage by rescue personnel). Flight control continuity was established from the cockpit to all flight control surfaces. The engine remained partially attached to the firewall, and the two-bladed propeller remained attached to the engine crankshaft. The propeller blades displayed some forward twistingdeformation. Examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation.

Aircraft

Registration
N1976E
Reported as
Aeronca 7AC
Category
Airplane
Serial number
7AC-5543
Built
1946
Airframe hours
4,607
Engine
Continental A-65-8, 65 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · December 11, 2021
Equipment
None

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
23
Injuries
Fatal
Certificate
Commercial
Airplane ratings
Single-engine sea, Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
Seat
Front
Restraint
4-point
Toxicology
Performed
Flight hours
720 total
Role
Co-pilot
Age
22
Injuries
Fatal
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 2, With waivers/limitations
Seat
Rear
Restraint
4-point
Toxicology
Performed
Flight hours
3 total

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
Calm
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
73 °F, dew point 37 °F
Altimeter
29.99 inHg
Observed at
KHAE, 20 nm away
METAR
KHAE 022235Z AUTO 00000KT 10SM CLR 23/03 A2999 RMK AO2

Docket · 8

The files NTSB released with the investigation on November 8, 2023, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 242 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.