CEN25LA045

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna R182 · Crowley, LA · November 18, 2024

Accident · No injuriesClass 4 · LimitedFinal report
Date
November 18, 2024, 14:35 local (20:35 UTC)
Place
Crowley, LA
Injuries
1 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N738PGCessna R182
Defining event
Landing-landing roll: Landing area overshoot
Weather
Instrument (IMC) · Day
Status
Completed
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 4 - Basic report with no Prelim publish
NTSB office
Central Region
Parties
FAA
FAA report
20241118020449A
Case key
195502

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The pilot’s un-stabilized landing approach and high airspeed during the approach, that resulted in touchdown with insufficient runway remaining to stop the airplane.

Findings · 4

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Performance/control parameters: descent/approach/glide pathAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedCessna R182: 1 caseAll aircraft: 809 casesProbable cause
Use of equip/info: aircraft controlPersonnel issues › Task performance · PilotCessna R182: 13 casesAll aircraft: 9,295 casesProbable cause
Runway/land/takeoff/taxi surface: wet surfaceEnvironmental issues › Physical environment · Effect on operationCessna R182: 1 caseAll aircraft: 141 cases
Performance/control parameters: airspeedAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedCessna R182: 1 caseAll aircraft: 1,681 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The pilot reported that he was returning from a pipeline patrol flight and was landing to the south on the north-south oriented grass runway which was wet from recent rain. He said that upon touchdown the airplane “yanked” to the left and began sliding on the wet grass. He could not stop the airplane because of the reduced braking action due to the wet runway. The airplane impacted a hangar located at the south end of the runway and the right wing sustained substantial damage. The operator reported that he had witnessed the accident. He noted that the weather conditions were getting worse and were approaching instrument meteorological conditions. He saw the airplane approach from the north to land to the south on the north-south oriented runway. Initially the airplane was lined up on a field to the east of the runway and he then saw the airplane attempt to turn and line up with the runway. He noted that the airplane appeared lower and faster than normal. After the airplane turned toward the runway, it touched down about halfway down the 2,500 ft. runway and was about 45° from runway alignment. The airplane then started to skid sideways on the wet grass. The airplane tires then regained grip and the airplane darted to the side and impacted the hangar at the south end of the runway. The operator stated that the pilot did not report any problem with the rudder trim system either before or after the accident. Well after the accident, the pilot stated that the rudder trim on the airplane was not operating correctly, and the skid-slip ball was not centered during the flight. He said the rudder trim wheel had no tension. He reported no other mechanical issues with the airplane. The pilot’s report of the rudder trim system issues was not provided until after the airplane was no longer available for examination of the rudder trim system. Regardless, the rudder trim should not have inhibited the pilot from maintaining directional control of the airplane while landing on the wet runway. The reported weather conditions at a nearby airport included a broken ceiling of 700 ft. above ground level (agl), an overcast ceiling at 1,300 ft. agl, and 7 miles visibility.

Aircraft

Registration
N738PG
Reported as
Cessna R182
Category
Airplane
Serial number
R18200949
Built
1979
Engine
Lycoming O-540-J3C5D, 235 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Business · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Destination
Same as departure
Airport
LS09 · A J Patrol, runway 18/36, 2,400 × 150 ft, grass/turf
Equipment
Unknown

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
29
Injuries
None
Certificate
Commercial
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, With waivers/limitations
Seat
Left
Restraint
3-point
Flight hours
750 total · 350 in this make and model

Weather

Conditions
Instrument (IMC) · Day
Wind
140° at 9 knots
Visibility
7 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
700 ft broken
Temperature
75 °F, dew point 75 °F
Altimeter
29.72 inHg
Observed at
KIYA, 16 nm away
METAR
METAR KIYA 182035Z AUTO 14009KT 7SM BKN007 OVC013 24/24 A2972 RMK AO2 OVC V BKN T02380238=

Docket · 3

The files NTSB released with the investigation on June 20, 2025, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 1.1 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.