CHI08CA092

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 210N · Cincinnati, OH · March 20, 2008

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
March 20, 2008, 14:30 local (18:30 UTC)
Place
Cincinnati, OH
Injuries
1 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Initial climb
Aircraft
N4943UCessna 210N
Defining event
Initial climb: Electrical system malf/failure
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report April 30, 2008
Report
Approved by Office Director
Parties
FAA-Cincinnati FSDO
FAA report
20080320832569A
Case key
67866

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The pilot's decision to operate the airplane with a "dead" battery contrary to guidance provided by the Pilot's Operating Handbook. An additional cause was the pilot's failure to verify that the landing gear was fully down and locked prior to landing. Contributing factors were the pilot's failure to properly service the battery prior to the flight and the subsequent loss of all electrical power, which rendered that normal gear extension system inoperative.

Findings · 5

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Electrical power systemAircraft › Aircraft systems · FailureCessna 210N: 1 caseAll aircraft: 48 casesProbable cause
Electrical power system: battery/chargerAircraft › Aircraft systems · Incorrect service/maintenanceCessna 210N: 1 caseAll aircraft: 37 casesProbable cause
Use of equip/info: use of policy/procedurePersonnel issues › Task performance · PilotCessna 210N: 1 caseAll aircraft: 191 casesProbable cause
Action: incorrect action selectionPersonnel issues › Action/decision · PilotCessna 210N: 1 caseAll aircraft: 397 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The pilot had not flown the airplane over the winter and the battery had lost its charge. The engine was started with the assistance of ground power. After engine start-up, the alternator output indicated 29 volts, battery voltage indicated zero, and the ammeter showed that the battery was charging.The pilot reported that upon raising the landing gear and flaps after liftoff, "immediately all electrical power went out." The pilot elected to remain in the traffic pattern and return for an immediate landing. He lowered the landing gear handle. However, due to what he perceived as an urgent situation and the attention required by other traffic in the vicinity, he did not use the emergency gear extension procedure to insure that the landing gear was fully down and locked. Upon landing, the main landing gear collapsed and the airplane departed the left side of the runway. The left horizontal stabilizer sustained skin and sub-structure damage. A post accident inspection revealed that the battery had little or no electrolyte in it. Battery output was 8.3 volts, with no indication of electrical current. The alternators and voltage regulators were tested. No anomalies with the function of the alternators or regulators were observed. The airplane was equipped with a 28-volt dual-alternator electrical system. The Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH) stated that "use of the ground service plug receptacle for starting an airplane with a 'dead' battery or charging a 'dead' battery in the airplane is not recommended." It added that a "failure to observe this precaution could result in loss of electrical power during flight." Landing gear extension and retraction is controlled by an electric motor, which provided hydraulic pressure to actuate the gear. Loss of electrical power prevented operation of the motor and required that the landing gear be extended manually. The pilot commented that the accident may have been prevented by inspecting the battery fluid level prior to the flight because the airplane had been tied down all winter.

Factual narrative

The pilot planned a local flight in order to checkout some recent maintenance work and to charge the battery. He added that the airplane had not been flown over the winter and the battery had lost its charge. The engine was started with the assistance of ground power. After start-up, both alternator out lights on the instrument panel went out indicating to him that they were both on-line. The airplane was equipped with a 28-volt, dual alternator electrical system. The alternator output indicated 29 volts, battery voltage indicated zero, and the ammeter showed that the battery was charging. He conducted the pre-takeoff run-up in accordance with the checklist. All radios and the global positioning system receiver were on and functioning normally prior to takeoff. The pilot reported that at liftoff he raised the landing gear handle, pulled the flap lever up, and reduced to climb power. He reported that "immediately all electrical power went out." The pilot elected to remain in the traffic pattern and return for an immediate landing. He lowered the landing gear handle. However, due to what he perceived as an urgent situation and the attention required by other traffic in the vicinity, he did not use the emergency gear extension procedure to insure that the landing gear was fully down and locked. Upon landing on runway 24 (3,499 feet by 75 feet, asphalt), the main landing gear collapsed and the airplane departed the left side of the runway before coming to rest. The left horizontal stabilizer sustained skin and sub-structure damage. A post accident inspection revealed that the battery had little or no electrolyte in it. Battery output was measured at 8.3 volts, with no indication of electrical current. The alternators and voltage regulators were tested under direct supervision of the Federal Aviation Administration. No anomalies with the function of the alternators or regulators were observed. The Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH) stated that "use of the ground service plug receptacle for starting an airplane with a 'dead' battery or charging a 'dead' battery in the airplane is not recommended." The POH added that a "failure to observe this precaution could result in loss of electrical power during flight." Landing gear extension and retraction is controlled by an electric motor, which provided hydraulic pressure to actuate the gear. Loss of electrical power prevented operation of the motor and required that the landing gear be extended manually. The pilot commented that the accident may have been prevented by inspecting the battery fluid level prior to the flight.

Aircraft

Registration
N4943U
Reported as
Cessna 210N
Category
Airplane
Serial number
21064842
Airframe hours
3,055
Engine
Continental IO-520-L13, 300 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · July 1, 2007
Departed
ISZ · Cincinnati, OH
Airport
ISZ · Cincinnati-Blue Ash, runway 24, 3,499 × 75 ft, asphalt

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
66
Injuries
None
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Medical
Class 3, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
June 1, 2006
Seat
Left
Flight hours
1,353 total · 214 in this make and model · 0 in the last 90 days · 0 in the last 30 days · 0 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
280° at 13 knots, gusting 17
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
52 °F, dew point 27 °F
Altimeter
30.21 inHg
Observed at
LUK, 9 nm away

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.