CHI96LA076

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 152 · Chesterfield, MO · January 14, 1996

Accident · Minor injuriesLimited investigationFinal report
Date
January 14, 1996, 09:35 local (15:35 UTC)
Place
Chesterfield, MO
Injuries
1 minor
Damage
Destroyed
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N24311Cessna 152
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report May 9, 1996
Report
Approved by Office Director
FAA report
19960114046769A
Case key
10185

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

the pilot misjudged the flare and performed an improper recovery from a bounced landing. A factor was the inadequate ground instruction concerning recovery from a bounced landing.

Sequence of events

NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.

Hard landingLanding - flare/touchdown
Flare - misjudgedPilot in commandCause
Recovery from bounced landing - improperPilot in commandCause
Inadequate initial trainingFlight instructor(on ground)Factor
Loss of control - on ground/waterLanding - flare/touchdown
Landing gear,wheel - overload
Remedial action - improperPilot in command
In flight collision with objectLanding - aborted
Object - hangar/airport building

Analysis

The student pilot reported that he was on his first unsupervised solo, and was practicing touch-and-go's. On the first landing he hit hard and began to porpoise. He tried to set an approach attitude after the third bounce, but lost directional control on the ground. The airplane was heading for a row of hangars so he attempted to takeoff, but was unable to clear the hangars. The airplane struck the hangars at the roof line and came to a stop. The student pilot's instructor reported that instruction concerning porpoising had been discussed. The student pilot recalled that he had received instruction about porpoising, but it had not been discussed in detail. He had been told to set an approach attitude, but was uncertain exactly what that meant. Parts of the wheel rim were found on the runway.

Factual narrative

On January 14, 1996, at 0935 central standard time, a Cessna 152, N24311, operated by Phoenix Aviation, Chesterfield, Missouri, sustained substantial damage when it impacted and remained on the roof of a hangar after an aborted landing. The student pilot received minor injuries. The 14 CFR Part 91 flight departed the Spirit of St. Louis Airport, Chesterfield, Missouri, on a local student flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed.

The student pilot reported that he planned to practice touch and go's during the flight. On the first landing he hit hard and bounced. The airplane landed on the nose wheel and started porpoising. He reported that he tried to recover after the third bounce by setting an approach attitude, but lost directional control. The airplane veered off runway 26R to the left 90 degrees, and was heading for a row of hangars. He applied full throttle and tried to gain enough altitude to clear the hangars. The airplane impacted the hangar at the roof line and came to a stop. The pilot secured the airplane, and with help from others, was able to climb down to safety.

An Operations Inspector from the Federal Aviation Administration reported that the student pilot was on his first unsupervised solo. He reported that the skid marks on the ground revealed that the airplane veered off the runway and was still on the ground as it headed for the hangars. He also reported that parts of the wheel rim had broken off during the impact and been found on the runway.

The Operations Inspector asked the student pilot's flight instructor about the student pilot's flight proficiency. The instructor characterized the student pilot as a "great student" who was quick to learn and apply new knowledge. Asked whether recovery from a porpoising situation had been covered during their instruction, the instructor responded that the situation had been discussed. When the student pilot was questioned about instruction he had received concerning porpoising, he recalled it had been discussed, but not in detail. The student pilot reported that the instructor had told him to re-establish the approach attitude, but he was uncertain exactly what that meant.

Aircraft

Registration
N24311
Reported as
Cessna 152
Category
Airplane
Serial number
15280209
Airframe hours
6,556
Engine
Lycoming O-235-L2C, 110 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Registered owner
Phoenix Aviation
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · November 7, 1995 · 76 hours before
Departed
SUS
Airport
SUS · Spirit Of St. Louis, runway 26R, 3,800 × 75 ft, asphalt

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
40
Certificate
Student
Medical
Class 2, Valid Medical--no waivers/lim.
Seat
Left
Flight hours
25 total · 15 in this make and model · 2 as pilot in command · 15 in the last 90 days · 5 in the last 30 days · 1 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Visibility
20 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
46 °F, dew point 28 °F
Altimeter
29.00 inHg
Observed at
SUS, 1 nm away

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.

Other investigations on N24311 · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.