- Date
- July 13, 2009, 17:45 local (21:45 UTC)
- Place
- Charleston, WV
- Injuries
- 131 uninjured
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Phase of flight
- Enroute
- Aircraft
- N387SWBoeing 737
- Defining event
- Enroute-cruise: Aircraft structural failure
- Status
- Completed · report August 18, 2010
- Report
- Approved by Office Director
- NTSB office
- Major Investigations Division
- Parties
- FAA AAI-100
- FAA report
- 20090713024309A
- Case key
- 74266
From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.
On this page
Probable cause
Fuselage skin failure due to preexisting fatigue at a chemically milled step.
Findings · 2
NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.
Sequence of events
The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.
Analysis
Flight data recorder data revealed that the airplane took off and climbed for about 25 minutes to an altitude of approximately 35,000 feet, at which point the cabin altitude warning activated, and the captain disengaged the autopilot. Postincident examination of the airplane revealed fatigue cracking of the fuselage skin near the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer adjacent to the rupture. The fatigue cracking penetrated the fuselage skin and created an approximate 18-inch by 12-inch flap in the skin that depressurized the airplane. The fuselage skin assembly near the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer was manufactured by bonding two full aluminum sheets together, then selectively chemically milling away pockets (bays) of the inner sheet. Continuous fatigue cracks initiated from multiple origins on the inner surface of the skin adjacent to the step formed at the edge of the chemically milled area and propagated outward. Following the Southwest Airlines (SWA) flight 2294 event, on September 3, 2009, Boeing issued Service Bulletin (SB) 737-53A1301, calling for repetitive external inspections to detect cracks in the fuselage skin along the chemically milled step at stringers S-1 and S-2 right and between BS 827 and BS 847. (The hole from the SWA event was within those boundaries.) If cracks are detected, operators are to contact Boeing for repair instructions. On January 12, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration issued Airworthiness Directive 2010-01-09, which mandated the inspection requirements in SB 737-53A1301.
Factual narrative
History of Flight On July 13, 2009, about 1745 eastern daylight time, Southwest Airlines (SWA) flight 2294, a Boeing 737-3H4 (737), N387SW, experienced rapid decompression while in cruise flight at approximately 35,000 feet when the fuselage crown skin ruptured just forward of the vertical stabilizer. Passenger oxygen masks deployed automatically. The flight crew declared an emergency, and the flight landed uneventfully at Yeager Airport (CRW), Charleston, West Virginia. The flight, which was on an instrument flight rules flight plan, had departed Nashville International Airport, Nashville, Tennessee, and was scheduled to fly to Baltimore-Washington International Airport, Baltimore, Maryland. Flight data recorder data revealed that the airplane took off and climbed for about 25 minutes to an altitude of approximately 35,000 feet. At that point, the cabin altitude warning activated, and the captain disengaged the autopilot and began a descent. The altitude warning ceased as the airplane descended through approximately 9,000 feet. Cockpit voice recorder data and postincident interviews revealed that the flight and cabin crewmembers followed appropriate cockpit procedures following the rapid decompression and during the emergency descent and landing at CRW. Injuries to Persons No injuries occurred during the event. Damage to Aircraft A three-sided hole (flap) was located in skin assembly part number 65C35792-3 in the fuselage crown skin near the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer and measured about 17.4 inches longitudinally and between 11.5 and 8.6 inches circumferentially. Personnel Information The captain had accumulated 22,500 total flight hours, 19,300 hours of which were in the 737. He held an airline transport pilot (ATP) certificate and a class one medical certificate with a limitation/waiver for corrective lenses. The first officer had accumulated 10,100 total flight hours, 2,240 hours of which were in the 737. He held an ATP certificate and a class two medical certificate with no limitations/waivers. Aircraft Information The airplane, serial number 26602, was delivered to SWA in June 1994. At the time of the SWA event, the airplane had accumulated approximately 42,500 cycles and 50,500 hours. Tests and Research Skin assembly parts are made of an outer sheet of skin, which covers the entire assembly, and a waffle-pattern doubler sheet hot bonded to the inner surface of the part. Both pieces were 0.036-inch-thick, 2024–T3 clad aluminum sheets. Boeing indicated that the skin assembly was manufactured by forming and bonding two full sheets together, then selectively masking and chemically milling away pockets (bays) of the inner doubler sheet to create a waffle pattern. The bay immediately adjacent to the rupture is not chemically milled to provide for possible installation of an emergency locator transponder (ELT) antenna. Magnified inspections of the fracture surface of the skin assembly part revealed bright faceted surfaces indicativeof fatigue progress along the longitudinal section of the flap, which followed the chemically milled edge of the adjacent doubler. The circumferential crack regions displayed matte grey slant fracture surfaces and bulk deformation patterns indicative of overstress tearing away from the longitudinal portion of the crack. The longitudinal fatigue crack was 13.7 inches long from approximately BS 831 to BS 844. Highly magnified inspections of the longitudinal crack revealed continuous fatigue thumbnail cracks propagating outward (through-thickness) from multiple origins at the inner surface of the skin. The visual depth of the fatigue regions varied along the crack length. Near the middle of the longitudinal crack, the fatigue crack appeared to completely penetrate the skin thickness for a distance of approximately 3 inches. Scanning electron microscope examinations clearly showed microscopic features typical of fatigue progression, including areas of striations, in the longitudinal crack region. Additional Information The specific area of rupture and skin cracking (adjacent to the non-chemically milled skin to allow for a potential rear ELT antenna installation) associated with the SWA event was not subject to any inspection airworthiness directives (AD) or service bulletins (SB). However, Boeing finite element modeling suggests stress levels are higher in the skin at the edges of chemically milled steps adjacent to non-chemically milled bays due to the difference in stiffness. Following the SWA event, on September 3, 2009, Boeing issued SB 737-53A1301, calling for repetitive external inspections to detect cracks in the fuselage skin along the chemically milled step at stringers S-1 and S-2 right and between BS 827 and BS 847. (The hole from the SWA event was within those boundaries.) If cracks are detected, operators are to contact Boeing for repair instructions. On January 12, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration issued AD 2010-01-09, which mandated the inspection requirements in SB 737-53A1301.
Aircraft
- Registration
- N387SW
- Reported as
- Boeing 737 (3H4)
- Category
- Airplane
- Serial number
- 26602
- Airframe hours
- 50,888
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Part 121
- Operator
- Southwest Airlines Co
- Registered owner
- US Bank NA Trustee
- Airworthiness certificate
- Standard, Transport
- Last inspection
- Continuous airworthiness · June 15, 2009
- Departed
- BNA · Nashville, TN
- Destination
- BWI · Baltimore, MD
- Flight plan
- Unknown
- Airport
- CRW · Yeager Airport, Charleston, WV
Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.
Flight crew · 2
As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.
- Role
- Pilot
- Age
- 53
- Injuries
- None
- Certificates
- Commercial, Private, Airline transport
- Airplane ratings
- Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
- Instrument ratings
- Airplane
- Medical
- Class 1, With waivers/limitations
- Last flight review
- June 14, 2009
- Seat
- Left
- Flight hours
- 22,500 total · 19,300 in this make and model · 17,500 as pilot in command · 225 in the last 90 days · 75 in the last 30 days
- Role
- Co-pilot
- Age
- 41
- Injuries
- None
- Certificates
- Flight instructor, Airline transport, Commercial
- Airplane ratings
- Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
- Instrument ratings
- Airplane
- Medical
- Class 2, Without waivers/limitations
- Last flight review
- August 5, 2008
- Seat
- Right
- Flight hours
- 10,100 total · 2,240 in this make and model · 6,300 as pilot in command · 167 in the last 90 days · 67 in the last 30 days
Docket · 21
The files NTSB released with the investigation on August 18, 2010, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 15.6 MB in all.
FAA reports on this event · 1
The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.