DCA23LA340

NTSB accident investigation · Supernal SUP83-1 · California City, CA · June 29, 2023

Accident · No injuriesClass 4 · LimitedFinal report
Date
June 29, 2023, 08:05 local (15:05 UTC)
Place
California City, CA
Injuries
1 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Maneuvering
Aircraft
N283TDSupernal SUP83-1
Defining event
Maneuvering: Loss of control in flight
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 4 - Basic report with no Prelim publish
NTSB office
Major Investigations Division
Parties
FAA, TVPX Aircraft Solutions
FAA report
20230629007349A
Case key
192490

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

Erroneous signal processing that resulted in a total loss of propulsion power.

Findings · 1

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

On June 29, 2023, at 0805 Pacific daylight time (PDT), a Supernal, LLC., SUP83-1 unmanned aircraft system, N283TD, received substantial damage during a developmental test flight at the manufacturer’s test site. There were no injuries. The aircraft was operating with an FAA Certificate of Waiver (COA) 2022-WSA-213-SAC-REV1, under Exemption No. 20050 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2022-1757. According to the operator/manufacturer, the test flights were intended to expand the aircraft’s flight envelope from the previously expanded forward speed envelope of 8 ft/sec to 20 ft/sec. At the beginning of the flight test, hover checks were performed. The first hover was very stable, and during the second hover there were some oscillations that were not present during the first hover. In the second hover, while landing, the aircraft did not detect the ground and the rotors continued rotating and the aircraft oscillated a little. The crew-chief/observer then manually cycled the avionics power by removing the power jumper connector on front of aircraft and reinserted it to reboot the system, after which the GPS and telemetry were noted to be stable. The crew then proceeded to execute the steps for forward flight, and the aircraft remained in GPS fixed mode as it climbed to 20 ft above ground level (AGL) in a stabilized hover test. After the hover test and systems check, the decision was made to continue the test flight, so the pilot in command (PIC) turned the aircraft to the outbound heading and accelerated it. Upon reaching an acceleration of 9 ft/second the right inceptor, used to control the aircraft about its three axes, was then moved to the detent to capture the 12 ft/sec data point. The aircraft accelerated through the 12 ft/sec targeted velocity data point to the 16 ft/sec data point, at which time the PIC then pulled back inceptor to reduce the speed to the 12 ft/sec data point. During the acceleration and deceleration of the vehicle there were good stable responses to control inputs. The inceptor was then pulled back to achieve maximum deceleration to bring the aircraft to a stop, and the aircraft responded normally, stopping its forward velocity. The inceptor was then moved to the detent to enter the hover position, at which point all power was lost and all rotors stopped turning and the aircraft fell to the ground from a height of about 20 ft AGL. Upon impact with the ground the aircraft bounced and came to rest upside down. There was damage to the landing gear, fuselage, wingtip nacelles, wing booms, tailbooms, and empennage. The accident aircraft, a SUP83-1 unmanned aircraft system, serial number 002, manufactured in 2023, registered to TVPX Aircraft Solutions Inc., and operated by Supernal LLC., as a 25% subscale unmanned test aircraft used to research distributed electric propulsion technologies. The aircraft has six propulsors driven by electric motors that are powered by lithium-ion battery packs. The aircraft can perform vertical take-offs andlandings and can be reconfigured to horizontal flight with lift being generated by its wings. The aircraft is controlled from a handheld transmitter by a remote pilot and monitored by a PC laptop ground station linked to the aircraft via telemetry radios inside a mobile trailer at the test site. At the time of the accident the aircraft had accumulated about 1.9 hours. The pilot was an FAA certified private airplane pilot, and reported 560 hours total flight experience, of which about 1 hour was with the accident aircraft. The test flight was also supported by a visual observer who was stationed near the pilot and one team member who was located inside the ground control station. The pilot, visual observer, and ground control station operator used hands free headsets to maintain communication during the entire event, and there were no communication difficulties. The test site for this aircraft is a privately owned area near California City, California, within the Hyundai Motor Group’s California Proving Grounds automotive testing facility. Surrounded by unimproved desert, the test area has a large, paved ramp area from which operations are conducted along with the supporting infrastructure appropriate for the operations of the site. Per COA, SUP 83-1 was permitted to fly within its test area up to 400’ AGL, remaining clear of both Mojave Air & Spaceport/Rutan Field Airport’s (MHV’s) controlled airspace, and the Edwards Air Force Base’s Restricted Area 2515. Weather was not a factor in the accident. At 0600 PDT the weather at MHV, located 6 miles from the test site, was reported as sky clear with winds variable at 2 kts, visibility 10 statute miles, and temperature 82 degrees. The operator/developer’s post-accident examination revealed that there was erroneous signal processing of commands from the handheld transmitter. The erroneous signal processing caused the high-voltage contactor on the vehicle to open, resulting in a total loss of propulsion power. Further analysis of the software and hardware revealed that the contactor command from the handheld transmitter was not filtered, which resulted in short-duration signal noise being unimpeded.

Aircraft

Registration
N283TD
Reported as
Supernal SUP83-1
Category
Powered-lift, unmanned
Serial number
002
Airframe hours
1.93
Engine
T-Motor U13II KV130, 24 lbs thrust, electric
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight test · Part 91
Operator
Supernal LLC
Registered owner
Tvpx Aircraft Solutions Inc Trustee
Airworthiness certificate
Unknown
Last inspection
Condition · June 28, 2023
Destination
Same as departure

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
55
Injuries
None
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 2, Without waivers/limitations
Last flight review
December 21, 2022
Seat
None
Restraint
None
Flight hours
560 total · 1 in this make and model · 517 as pilot in command

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
Variable at 2 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
82 °F
Observed at
KMHV, 6 nm away

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.