DCA95MA001

NTSB accident investigation · ATR ATR-72-212 · Roselawn, IN · October 31, 1994

Accident · FatalClass 1 · MajorFinal report
Date
October 31, 1994, 15:59 local (21:59 UTC)
Place
Roselawn, IN
Injuries
68 fatal
Damage
Destroyed
Phase of flight
Enroute
Aircraft
N401AMATR ATR-72-212
Weather
Instrument (IMC) · Dusk
Status
Completed · report October 22, 1996
Report
Board-adopted at Board Meeting
Investigation class
Class 1
NTSB office
Major Investigations Division
Safety recommendations
Yes
FAA report
19941031036779A
Case key
10992

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

the loss of control, attributed to a sudden and unexpected aileron hinge moment reversal that occurred after a ridge of ice accreted beyond the deice boots while the airplane was in a holding pattern during which it intermittently encountered supercooled cloud and drizzle/rain drops, the size and water content of which exceeded those described in the icing certification envelope. The airplane was susceptible to this loss of control, and the crew was unable to recover. Contributing to the accident were: 1) the French Directorate General for Civil Aviation's (DGAC's) inadequate oversight of the ATR 42 and 72, and its failure to take the necessary corrective action to ensure continued airworthiness in icing conditions; and 2) the DGAC's failure to provide the FAA with timely airworthiness information developed from previous ATR incidents and accidents in icing conditions,3) the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA's) failure to ensure that aircraft icing certification requirements, operational requirements for flight into icing conditions, and FAA published aircraft icing information adequately accounted for the hazards that can result from flight in freezing rain, 4) the FAA's inadequate oversight of the ATR 42 and 72 to ensure continued airworthiness in icing conditions; and 5) ATR's inadequate response to the continued occurrence of ATR 42 icing/roll upsets which, in conjunction with information learned about aileron control difficulties during the certification and development of the ATR 42 and 72, should have prompted additional research, and the creation of updated airplane flight manuals, flightcrew operating manuals and training programs related to operation of the ATR 42 and 72 in such icing conditions.

Sequence of events

NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.

Loss of control - in flightManeuvering - holding(ifr)
Weather condition - icing conditions
Airframe - iceCause
Acft/equip,inadequate aircraft manualsManufacturerCause
Aircraft/equipment inadequateManufacturerCause
Inadequate substantiation processOther govt organizationCause
Inadequate substantiation processFaa(organization)Factor
Information insufficientFaa(other/organization)Factor
In flight collision with terrain/waterDescent - uncontrolled

Analysis

The airplane was in a holding pattern and was descending to a newly assigned altitude of 8,000 feet when it experienced an uncommanded roll excursion and crashed during a rapid descent. The loss of ccontrol was attributed to a sudden and unexpected aileron hinge moment reversal that occurred after a ridge of ice accreted beyond the deice boots. The manufacturer failed to disseminate adequate warnings and guidance to operators about the adverse characteristics of, and techniques to recover from, ice-induced aileron hinge moment reversal events; and failed to develop additional airplane modifications, which led directly to this accident. The DGAC failed to require the manufacturer to take additional corrective actions, such as performing additional icing tests, issuing more specific warnings regarding the aileron hinge moment reversal phenomenon, developing additional airplane modifications, and providing specific guidance on the recovery from a hinge moment reversal, which led directly to this accident. The ability of the FAA to to monitor, on a real-time basis, the continued airworthiness of the ATR airplanes was hampered by the inadequately defined lines of communication, the inadequate means for the FAA to retrieve pertinent information, and the DGAC's failure to provide the FAA with critical airworthiness information., because of the DGAC's apparent belief that the information was not required to be provided under the terms of the Bilateral Airworthiness Agreement.

Factual narrative

On Monday, October 31, 1994, about 1600 CST, an Avions de Transport Regional ATR-72, N401AM, operated by Simmons Airlines as American Eagle flight 4184, struck the ground after the flightcrew lost control of the airplane during an adverse roll event at 9,200 feet. The captain, first officer, two flight attendants and 64 passengers received fatal injuries and the airplane was destroyed by impact forces. The instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) prevailed, both en-route and at the accident site; and an instrument flight rules flight plan had been filed. Flight 4184 was being operated under 14 CFR Part 121 at the time of the accident.

American Eagle flight 4184 was scheduled passenger service between Indianapolis, Indiana and Chicago, Illinois. The flight had proceeded uneventfully until it arrived in the Chicago area, where the flightcrew was instructed to "hold" for sequencing into Chicago's O'Hare Airport (ORD). Flight 4184 had been holding for approximately 32 minutes at 10,000 when the crew received a clearance to descend to 8,000 feet. During the descent to 8,000 feet and in a right turn in the holding pattern, the airplane rolled to approximately 70 degrees right wing down. The flightcrew attempted to recover, however, the airplane rolled to the right a second time and continued to roll to an inverted position.

Aircraft

Registration
N401AM
Reported as
ATR ATR-72-212
Category
Airplane
Serial number
401
Airframe hours
1,352
Engine
P&W 127, turbo prop
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Part 121
Operator
American Eagle Airlines
Registered owner
AMR Group, Inc.
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Transport
Last inspection
Continuous airworthiness · March 29, 1994
Departed
IND · Indianapolis, IN
Destination
ORD · Chicago, IL
Flight plan
IFR

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
29
Certificates
Flight instructor, Airline transport, Commercial
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, Valid Medical--no waivers/lim.
Last flight review
June 8, 1994
Seat
Left
Toxicology
Performed
Flight hours
7,867 total · 1,548 in this make and model · 190 in the last 90 days
Role
Co-pilot
Age
30
Injuries
Fatal
Certificate
Commercial
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
Last flight review
September 7, 1994
Seat
Right

Weather

Conditions
Instrument (IMC) · Dusk
Visibility
0.5 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
500 ft overcast
Temperature
39 °F

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.