ERA13CA028

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172RG · Mobile, AL · October 11, 2012

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
October 11, 2012, 12:04 local (16:04 UTC)
Place
Mobile, AL
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N4939VCessna 172RG
Defining event
Landing: Landing gear not configured
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report March 13, 2013
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
Eastern Region Aviation
Parties
FAA/FSDO
FAA report
20121011023819A
Case key
85356

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The pilot’s failure to perform the before landing checklist and extend the landing gear before touchdown. Contributing to the accident was the designated pilot examiner’s inadequate remedial action.

Findings · 3

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Landing gear systemAircraft › Aircraft systems · Not used/operatedCessna 172RG: 4 casesAll aircraft: 113 casesProbable cause
Use of equip/info: use of checklistPersonnel issues › Task performance · PilotCessna 172RG: 4 casesAll aircraft: 336 casesProbable cause
Action: lack of actionPersonnel issues › Action/decision · Instructor/check pilotCessna 172RG: 1 caseAll aircraft: 792 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

According to the pilot, the purpose of the flight was to complete a commercial single-engine land checkride with a designated pilot examiner. During the straight-in landing approach, the pilot selected full flaps and reduced the engine power to idle in order to descend but did not use the before landing checklist and did not extend the landing gear. When the airplane was over the runway threshold, the pilot verified that the throttle was at idle and began to flare. Neither the pilot nor the designated pilot examiner verified that the landing gear was extended before the landing. The airplane landed on the runway without the landing gear extended, which resulted in substantial damage to the airframe. Both pilots reported that they did not hear the landing gear warning horn before landing. According to a mechanic, when the battery switch was turned on during the recovery of the airplane, the landing gear warning horn sounded normally. The pilot reported no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. In addition, the pilot noted that the accident could have been prevented if he had completed the before landing checklist.

Factual narrative

According to the pilot, the purpose of the flight was to complete a commercial single-engine land checkride with a designated pilot examiner. During the straight in landing approach, the pilot selected full flaps and reduced the engine power to idle in order to descend, but did not use the before landing checklist and did not extend the landing gear. Over the runway threshold, the pilot verified the throttle was at idle and began to flare the airplane. Prior to landing, the designated pilot examiner did not verify that the landing gear was extended. Subsequently, the airplane landed on the runway without the landing gear extended which resulted in substantial damage to the airframe. Both pilots reported that they did not hear the landing gear warning horn prior to landing without the landing gear extended. According to a mechanic, during the recovery of the airplane, when the battery switch was turned on, the landing gear warning horn sounded. The pilot reported no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. In addition, pilot noted that the before landing checklist was not completed and the accident could have been prevented if it had been completed.

Aircraft

Registration
N4939V
Reported as
Cessna 172RG
Category
Airplane
Serial number
172RG0420
Airframe hours
6,290
Engine
Lycoming O-360-E1A6, 180 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Operator
Flight Training Of Mobile LLC
Registered owner
Flight Training Of Mobile LLC
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · September 4, 2012
Departed
BFM · Mobile, AL
Destination
BFM · Mobile, AL
Airport
BFM · Mobile Downtown Airport, runway 32, 9,618 × 150 ft, asphalt

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
23
Injuries
None
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 2, Without waivers/limitations
Last flight review
November 16, 2011
Seat
Left
Flight hours
343 total · 17 in this make and model · 238 as pilot in command
Role
Check pilot
Age
68
Injuries
None
Certificates
Flight instructor, Airline transport, Commercial
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land, Multi-engine land, Single-engine sea
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 3, With waivers/limitations
Seat
Right
Flight hours
16,000 total · 400 in this make and model · 90 in the last 90 days

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
50° at 4 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
79 °F, dew point 63 °F
Altimeter
30.26 inHg
Observed at
BFM

Docket · 7

The files NTSB released with the investigation on February 1, 2013, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.