ERA13CA369

NTSB accident investigation · Maule M-5-210C · Verona, NY · August 11, 2013

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
August 11, 2013, 12:00 local (16:00 UTC)
Place
Verona, NY
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N6617RMaule M-5-210C
Defining event
Landing-flare/touchdown: Hard landing
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report September 5, 2013
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
Eastern Region Aviation
Parties
FAA/FSDO
FAA report
20130811016999A
Case key
87824

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The pilot’s delay in applying power after a bounced landing, resulting in collision with terrain during a go-around.

Findings · 3

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Action: delayed actionPersonnel issues › Action/decision · PilotAll aircraft: 894 casesProbable cause
Performance/control parameters: climb rateAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedAll aircraft: 265 casesProbable cause
Terrain: mountainous/hilly terrainEnvironmental issues › Physical environment · Contributed to outcomeAll aircraft: 329 cases

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The pilot stated after takeoff while en route to the destination airport he elected to fly to a private airstrip (Bates Field) located in rolling farmland. He lined up onto base leg for landing to the northwest on the upslope grass runway, and turned onto final approach. With 40 degrees of flaps extended, he identified the intended touchdown point, flared, and then climbed to attain the intended touchdown point. He landed, “but too hard and bounced up…,” touched down on the runway, and drifted off the runway into 6 to 8 inch high grass. He added power to abort the landing but impacted a knoll at the top of a crest on a hill, then continued climbing. While safely airborne he assessed the condition of the airplane noting the pilot and co-pilot doors were ajar, but did not find any other damage. He flew over the private airstrip and did not observe any damage then elected to proceed to his destination airport, where he landed uneventfully. While taxiing after landing he noticed the left landing gear was out of position. He further stated there was no preimpact mechanical failure or malfunction that caused the hard landing. Inspection of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed damage and distortion to structural tubing in the cockpit, and wrinkles in the fabric adjacent to the left main landing gear.

Factual narrative

The pilot stated after takeoff while en route to the destination airport he elected to fly to a private airstrip (Bates Field) located in rolling farmland. He lined up onto base leg for landing to the northwest on the upslope grass runway, and turned onto final approach. With 40 degrees of flaps extended he identified the intended touchdown point and flared but then climbed to attain the intended touchdown point. He landed, “but too hard and bounced up…” then touched down on the runway but drifted off the runway into 6 to 8 inch high grass. He added power to abort the landing but impacted a knoll at the top of a crest of a hill, then continued climbing. While safely airborne he assessed the condition of the airplane noting the pilot and co-pilot doors were ajar, but did not find any other damage. He flew over the private airstrip and did not observe any damage then elected to proceed to his destination airport, where he landed uneventfully. While taxiing after landing he noticed the left landing gear was out of position. He further stated there was no preimpact mechanical failure or malfunction that caused the hard landing. Inspection of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed damage and distortion to structural tubing in the cockpit, and wrinkles in the fabric adjacent to the left main landing gear.

Aircraft

Registration
N6617R
Reported as
Maule M-5-210C
Category
Airplane
Serial number
6095C
Airframe hours
1,160
Engine
Cont Motor IO-360-D, 210 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Operator
Moore Thomas R
Registered owner
Moore Thomas R
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · April 27, 2013
Departed
K16 · Rome, NY
Destination
VGC · Hamilton, NY
Airport
NONE · Bates Field, runway 30, 1,520 × 50 ft, grass/turf

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
52
Injuries
None
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine sea, Single-engine land
Medical
Class 3, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
June 9, 2013
Seat
Left
Flight hours
555 total · 82 in this make and model · 508 as pilot in command · 18 in the last 90 days · 12 in the last 30 days · 1 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
250° at 5 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
4,500 ft broken
Temperature
72 °F, dew point 54 °F
Altimeter
30.11 inHg
Observed at
SYR, 25 nm away

Docket · 5

The files NTSB released with the investigation on August 26, 2013, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 5.5 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.