ERA22LA298

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172 · Akron, OH · July 4, 2022

Accident · Serious injuriesClass 3 · LimitedFinal report
Date
July 4, 2022, 19:01 local (23:01 UTC)
Place
Akron, OH · School parking lot
Injuries
2 serious
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Enroute
Aircraft
N12115Cessna 172
Defining event
Enroute-descent: Fuel exhaustion
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 3
NTSB office
Eastern Region Aviation
Parties
FAA/FSDO, Textron, Lycoming Engines
FAA report
20220704011719A
Case key
105424

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The pilots’ improper preflight fuel planning and in-flight fuel management, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.

Findings · 3

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Planning/preparation: fuel planningPersonnel issues › Task performance · PilotCessna 172M: 6 casesAll aircraft: 719 casesProbable cause
Fluids: fuelAircraft › Fluids/misc hardware · Fluid managementCessna 172M: 12 casesAll aircraft: 1,695 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The pilot fueled the airplane before takeoff on the last leg of the cross-country flight. As he began the descent toward his home airport, the pilot noted that the fuel gauges were indicating lower than he had ever observed them to be. Shortly after he turned to a nearby airport to purchase additional fuel, the engine stopped producing power. During the forced landing, the airplane’s landing gear impacted trees, and the airplane descended nose-first to the ground, substantially damaging the fuselage and right wing. Examination of the wreckage revealed no evidence of fuel in the fuel tanks, fuel lines, or carburetor. No preimpact anomalies or malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation were observed. Fuel calculations for the takeoff and cruise portions of the accident flight revealed that between about 2 and 6 gallons of fuel could have remained at the time of the accident; however, these calculations did not account for improper fuel mixture leaning or fuel used during start, taxi, and run-up. Given that the pilot did not lean the mixture during the cross-country flight, it is likely the airplane’s fuel supply had been completely exhausted, resulting in the total loss of engine power. Had appropriate preflight fuel planning and inflight fuel monitoring been performed by the pilot, the fuel exhaustion likely would have been prevented.

Factual narrative

On July 4, 2022, about 1901 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 172M, N12115, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Akron, Ohio. The pilot and passenger were seriously injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot and passenger were returning from Connecticut and had stopped at Skyhaven Airport (76N), Tunkhannock, Pennsylvania, to fuel the airplane on the way back to Weltzien Skypark Airport (15G), Wadsworth, Ohio, which was the pilot’s home airport. Review of automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) data revealed that the airplane was first detected at 1627 shortly after departing 76N. The airplane climbed to an altitude of about 4,500 ft mean sea level (msl) and continued a westerly course for about 2 hours 15 minutes. The pilot reported that, as he began a descent toward 15G and looked at the fuel gauges, he noted that he had never recalled seeing them so low. He decided to divert to the Akron Fulton Airport (AKR), Akron, Ohio, to purchase fuel, and turned toward the southwest. Shortly after, the engine stopped producing power. The passenger questioned the pilot when “all of a sudden, everything got quiet,” and he responded, “We're out of fuel.” He executed a forced landing to a parking lot; however, on final approach, the landing gear impacted trees and the airplane pitched down. Track data showed that after the southwesterly turn, the airplane descended and impacted a parking lot .9 nautical mile short of runway 25 at AKR. Examination of the accident site by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed that the airplane impacted the parking lot nose-first, substantially damaging the fuselage and right wing. The FAA inspector noted no fuel odor at the accident site. Fuel receipts obtained after the accident supported the pilot’s statement that he purchased fuel at each stop along his route of flight. The 76N airport manager watched the pilot fuel the airplane and believed that he “topped off both tanks.” In a follow-up interview with the pilot, he stated that he occasionally leaned the mixture, but not always, and that on the accident flight he was “fighting a headwind . . . and was running [the engine] more rich than normal.” He reported that he typically set the power to 2,350-2,400 rpm. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no fuel in the fuel lines or carburetor bowl and a trace amount of fuel in the fuel filter. Examination of the fuel selector revealed no preimpact anomalies. The left and right fuel tanks were removed and examined, and no leaks were noted in the left fuel tank. The right fuel tank was impact damaged and breached. The left fuel tank fuel screen was free of obstruction. The airplane had an endurance of about 3.9 hours with 38 gallons of useable fuel. Referencing the Owner’s Manual Cruise & Performance Range Chart, at maximum gross weight with standard conditions, zero wind and lean mixture, thefuel consumption would be 8.1 gallons per hour (gph) at 75% power and 5,000 ft msl. According to ADS-B data, the first flight was 2.2 hours. Adding 1.75 gallons for takeoff, the fuel consumption would have been 19.57 gallons. Per the airport owner’s statement, the pilot performed a go-around maneuver on his first landing attempt at 76N. Adding an additional gallon for the go-around, the total fuel consumed would have been 20.57 gallons. The fuel receipt from 76N indicated 11.23 gallons were purchased, bringing the total fuel available for the accident flight to 28.66 gallons. According to ADS-B data, the flight was 2.6 hours, with a total fuel consumption of 22.92 gallons including 1.86 gallons for takeoff. Using the above-described standard conditions, at the time of the accident, the airplane would have had 5.74 gallons of fuel remaining. The Owner’s Manual states that: “Allowances for fuel reserve, headwinds, take-off and climb, and variations in mixture leaning technique should be made and are in addition to those shown on the chart.” The Operator’s Manual for the Lycoming O-320 series engine indicated a fuel consumption of 8.8 gph at 2,350 rpm, 65% economy cruise. At this fuel consumption rate, the first flight would have consumed 22.11 gallons (climb fuel 1.75 gallons, 2.2 hours at 8.8 gph, plus one gallon for the go around), leaving 15.89 gallons fuel available. Adding the 11.23 gallons purchased at 76N, the airplane would have had 27.12 gallons available for accident flight. The accident flight consumed 24.74 gallons (climb fuel 1.86 gallons, 2.6 hours at 8.8 gph). This would have resulted in 2.38 gallons remaining at the time of the accident. These calculations do not include leaning procedures, or fuel used during start, taxi, and run-up.

Aircraft

Registration
N12115
Reported as
Cessna 172 (M)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
17261818
Built
1973
Airframe hours
4,324.2
Engine
Lycoming O-320-E2D, 150 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · June 11, 2022 · 9.4 hours before
Departed
45PN · Tunkhannock, PA
Destination
15G · Wadsworth, OH
Airport
AKR · Akron Fulton Intl
Equipment
ADS-B, Stall warning system

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
71
Injuries
Serious
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Medical
BasicMed
Seat
Left

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
210° at 9 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
86 °F, dew point 55 °F
Altimeter
30.10 inHg
Observed at
AKR, 1 nm away
METAR
KAKR 042254Z AUTO 21009KT 10SM CLR 30/13 A3010 RMK AO2 SLP185 T03000133

Docket · 17

The files NTSB released with the investigation on November 15, 2023, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 187 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.