ERA25LA006

NTSB accident investigation · Piper PA24 · Moore Haven, FL · October 3, 2024

Accident · No injuriesClass 4 · LimitedFinal report
Date
October 3, 2024, 13:09 local (17:09 UTC)
Place
Moore Haven, FL · Sugar cane field
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Enroute
Aircraft
N12RDPiper PA24
Defining event
Enroute-cruise: Fuel exhaustion
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 4 - Basic report with no Prelim publish
NTSB office
Eastern Region Aviation
Parties
FAA/FSDO
FAA report
20241003014679A
Case key
195302

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The pilot’s failure to initiate the cross country flight with an adequate fuel supply, resulting in a loss of engine power and forced landing due to fuel exhaustion.

Findings · 2

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Fluids: fuelAircraft › Fluids/misc hardware · Fluid managementPiper PA-24-250: 24 casesAll aircraft: 1,695 casesProbable cause
Inspection: preflight inspectionPersonnel issues › Task performance · PilotPiper PA-24-250: 6 casesAll aircraft: 551 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The pilot reported that he departed on the first of two legs of a cross-country flight with full main fuel tanks (30 gallons each, 28 gallons useable). The first leg of the 1 hour and 45-minute flight was uneventful, and the engine performed normally during the flight. The airplane was not refueled after the completion of the first leg, so he checked his fuel both visually and with the fuel gauges. During the cruise portion of the return flight, he noted a partial loss of engine power, with rpm dropping to between 1,000 and 1,200. He initiated the checklist procedures for a partial power loss, declared an emergency with air traffic control, and power was briefly restored. The engine rpm again dropped, and since the closest airport was too far away, he executed a forced landing to a sugar cane field about 1 hour and 18 minutes into the return flight. The pilot stated that the airplane should have had about 2 hours of fuel remaining when the engine lost power. Federal Aviation Administration inspectors responded to the accident site and examined the wreckage; they confirmed substantial damage to the airframe. The fuel system was examined at the scene. The auxiliary wingtip fuel tanks and main fuel tanks contained no quantifiable fuel. The main fuel tanks were not ruptured, and there was no evidence of fuel leakage outside the airplane. The fuel strainer was undamaged and was empty of fuel. After recovery of the wreckage, the engine was prepared for a test run. The engine started on the first attempt and was eventually run up to 2,000 rpm before the run was concluded. Impact damage to the propeller prevented a run at a higher rpm. Also, the fuel tanks were filled with water to check for leaks; no leaks were noted. The pilot reported that the main tanks were “topped” with 8.7 gallons of fuel prior to the first leg of the trip. Prior to this servicing, the tanks were reportedly filled 26 days before the accident, and the pilot stated that his son flew the airplane for three touch-and-go landings after this refueling. Automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) data revealed that the airplane was airborne for 1 hour and 2 minutes and taxied a total of 18 minutes on this flight. Estimated fuel burn for a flight of this duration was about 15 gallons. Therefore, it is unlikely that the pilot initiated the cross-country trip with a full fuel load, and it is possible that he perceived his main fuel tanks to be completely full before beginning the first leg when they were not. The pilot’s operating handbook for the airplane stated that, due to several factors, many fuel cells do not hold their full rated capacity.

Aircraft

Registration
N12RD
Reported as
Piper PA24 (250)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
24-368
Built
1958
Airframe hours
4,366
Engine
Lycoming O-540-A1A5, 250 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · November 28, 2023 · 15 hours before
Departed
CDK · Cedar Key, FL
Destination
FXE · Fort Lauderdale, FL
Flight plan
IFR
Equipment
Stall warning system, Electronic primary flight display, Electronic multifunction display, ADS-B

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
62
Injuries
None
Certificate
Airline transport
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
Last flight review
June 23, 2024
Seat
Left
Restraint
3-point
Flight hours
25,900 total · 84 in this make and model · 7,650 as pilot in command · 102 in the last 90 days · 37 in the last 30 days · 3 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Visibility
10 statute miles
Temperature
32 °F, dew point 32 °F
Altimeter
29.93 inHg
Observed at
KOBE, 28 nm away
METAR
METAR KOBE 031715Z AUTO VRB03KT 10SM FEW037 FEW065 SCT075 A2993 RMK AO2 LTG DSNT NE

Docket · 10

The files NTSB released with the investigation on April 22, 2025, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 8.2 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.