ERA25LA118

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172 · Kennesaw, GA · January 29, 2025

Accident · No injuriesClass 4 · LimitedFinal report
Date
January 28, 2025, 21:05 local (Jan 29, 2025, 02:05 UTC)
Place
Kennesaw, GA · RWY 27
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N1159KCessna 172
Defining event
Landing: Landing area undershoot
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Night
Status
Completed
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 4 - Basic report with no Prelim publish
NTSB office
Eastern Region Aviation
Parties
FAA/FSDO
FAA report
20250128009569A
Case key
199695

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The student pilot’s failure to maintain an appropriate glide path and the flight instructor’s inadequate monitoring of the landing approach, which resulted in the airplane contacting the ground short of the runway.

Findings · 3

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Info processing/decision: identification/recognitionPersonnel issues › Action/decision · Student/instructed pilotCessna 172S: 10 casesAll aircraft: 559 casesProbable cause
Performance/control parameters: descent/approach/glide pathAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedCessna 172S: 18 casesAll aircraft: 809 casesProbable cause
Attention/monitoring: monitoring other personPersonnel issues › Psychological · Instructor/check pilotCessna 172S: 8 casesAll aircraft: 200 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

According to the flight instructor, the student pilot had previously completed three-night landings to a full stop and taxi back during the dual instructional flight. On the fourth attempt, the instructor elected to simulate a loss of engine power. While on final approach, the student pilot aligned the airplane with the runway centerline, and the flight instructor thought that the airplane would be able to reach the runway threshold. As the airplane approached the runway, the instructor described that the airplane was in a “flat position” and struck the ground, short of the runway. The nose landing gear was displaced upwards and aft which resulted in substantial damage to the airplane’s lower firewall. The flight instructor reported that there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. The student pilot and instructor stated that they believed that the runway end identifier lights were not operating during their flight and that only the two outer left and right green lights were illuminated for the entirety of the flight, including the preceding three landings, which factored into their depth perception for touchdown. During correspondence with the student pilot following the accident, he provided an annotated aerial image where he circled the lights he believed to be inoperative at the time of the accident. According to the airport manager, the lights referenced by the student, which appeared to be the runway end and edge lighting, were operational at the time of the accident.

Aircraft

Registration
N1159K
Reported as
Cessna 172 (S)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
172S10357
Built
2006
Airframe hours
7,143.9
Engine
Lycoming Engines IO-360-L2A, 180 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Operator
Cavu Aero LLC
Registered owner
Cavu Aero LLC
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Utility; Standard, Normal
Last inspection
100 hour · November 25, 2024
Airport
RYY · Cobb County Intl/Mccollum Fld, runway 27, 6,295 × 100 ft, concrete
Equipment
Electronic primary flight display, Electronic multifunction display, Auto-pilot, ADS-B

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Flight instructor
Age
66
Injuries
None
Certificates
Commercial, Flight instructor
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane, Helicopter
Medical
Class 1, Waiver time limited special
Last flight review
September 22, 2024
Seat
Right
Restraint
Lap only
Flight hours
4,405 total · 1,943 in this make and model · 3,560 as pilot in command · 18 in the last 90 days · 13 in the last 30 days · 1 in the last 24 hours
Role
Student pilot
Age
28
Injuries
None
Certificate
Student
Medical
Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
Seat
Left
Restraint
Lap only
Flight hours
52 total · 52 in this make and model · 5 as pilot in command · 11 in the last 90 days · 6 in the last 30 days · 1 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Night
Wind
Calm
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
45 °F, dew point 27 °F
Altimeter
30.03 inHg
Observed at
RYY, 1 nm away
METAR
METAR KRYY 282349Z 00000KT 10SM CLR 07/M03 A3003 RMK AO2 SLPNO T00671028 10133 20067 53001 $=

Docket · 5

The files NTSB released with the investigation on August 21, 2025, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 5.6 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.