GAA17CA042

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 152 · Miami, FL · October 17, 2016

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
October 17, 2016, 08:00 local (12:00 UTC)
Place
Miami, FL
Injuries
1 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Takeoff
Aircraft
N46953Cessna 152
Defining event
Takeoff-rejected takeoff: Loss of control on ground
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report January 18, 2017
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
General Aviation Accidents
Parties
FAA
FAA report
20161017018169A
Case key
94275

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The student pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the aborted takeoff, which resulted in a runway excursion.

Findings · 5

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Use of equip/info: aircraft controlPersonnel issues › Task performance · Student/instructed pilotCessna 152: 115 casesAll aircraft: 9,295 casesProbable cause
Performance/control parameters: directional controlAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedCessna 152: 32 casesAll aircraft: 3,958 casesProbable cause
Use of equip/info: use of equip/systemPersonnel issues › Task performance · PilotCessna 152: 7 casesAll aircraft: 1,391 casesProbable cause
Terrain: wet/muddy terrainEnvironmental issues › Physical environment · Contributed to outcomeCessna 152: 4 casesAll aircraft: 110 cases
Terrain: waterEnvironmental issues › Physical environment · Contributed to outcomeCessna 152: 1 caseAll aircraft: 97 cases

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The solo student pilot reported that after a normal taxi and run-up, he aligned the airplane on the runway centerline and started the takeoff roll. He further reported that he attempted to rotate the airplane at 50 knots and then again at 65 knots, but the airplane "couldn't takeoff." The student pilot subsequently reduced the power to idle and applied the brakes to abort the takeoff. During the aborted takeoff, the airplane veered off the runway to the left and encountered high grass and a water retention lake about 635 feet from the runway centerline. The student pilot reported that the airplane "wouldn't respond" to his control inputs during the aborted takeoff. The left wing sustained substantial damage. The operator reported in the National Transportation Safety Board Pilot/ Operator Aircraft Accident Report that the student pilot "rotated too early and got fixated on the airspeed indicator. Then the left brake was touched causing the airplane to veer to the left." The Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Safety Inspector reported that he completed a postaccident examination of the airplane and found that the brakes were functional and confirmed flight control continuity.

Factual narrative

The solo student pilot reported that after a normal taxi and run-up, he aligned the airplane on the runway centerline and started the takeoff roll. He further reported that he attempted to rotate the airplane at 50 knots and then again at 65 knots, but the airplane "couldn't takeoff." The student pilot subsequently reduced the power to idle and applied the brakes to abort the takeoff. During the aborted takeoff, the airplane veered off the runway to the left and encountered high grass and a water retention lake about 635 feet from the runway centerline. The student pilot reported that the airplane "wouldn't respond" to his control inputs during the aborted takeoff. The left wing sustained substantial damage. The operator reported in the National Transportation Safety Board Pilot/ Operator Aircraft Accident Report that the student pilot "rotated too early and got fixated on the airspeed indicator. Then the left brake was touched causing the airplane to veer to the left." The Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Safety Inspector reported that he completed a postaccident examination of the airplane and found that the brakes were functional and confirmed flight control continuity.

Aircraft

Registration
N46953
Reported as
Cessna 152 (NO SERIES)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
15283149
Built
1979
Airframe hours
8,302.3
Engine
Lycoming O-235-L2C, 115 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Operator
Dean International Inc.
Registered owner
R & E Airways Corp.
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
100 hour · October 9, 2016
Departed
TMB · Miami, FL
Destination
IMM · Immokalee, FL
Airport
TMB · Miami Executive, runway 09L, 5,003 × 150 ft, asphalt
Equipment
ADS-B

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Student pilot
Age
23
Injuries
None
Certificate
Student
Medical
Unknown, Unknown
Seat
Left
Restraint
3-point
Flight hours
47 total · 47 in this make and model · 2.4 as pilot in command · 47 in the last 90 days · 24 in the last 30 days · 0 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
40° at 4 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
73 °F, dew point 72 °F
Altimeter
29.90 inHg
Observed at
KTMB

Docket · 5

The files NTSB released with the investigation on December 15, 2016, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 1.0 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.