GAA17CA529

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 182 · Fairfield, MT · September 7, 2017

Accident · Minor injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
September 6, 2017, 18:45 local (Sep 7, 2017, 00:45 UTC)
Place
Fairfield, MT
Injuries
1 minor
Damage
Destroyed
Phase of flight
Enroute
Aircraft
N735KQCessna 182
Defining event
Enroute: Fuel exhaustion
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report November 27, 2017
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
General Aviation Accidents
Parties
FAA/ FSDO
FAA report
20170906010599A
Case key
95987

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The pilot's failure to secure the right fuel cap during the preflight inspection, which resulted in fuel exhaustion, a total loss of engine power, and an off-airport hard landing.

Findings · 4

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Inspection: preflight inspectionPersonnel issues › Task performance · PilotCessna 182Q: 1 caseAll aircraft: 551 casesProbable cause
Fuel system: fuel storageAircraft › Aircraft systems · Inadequate inspectionCessna 182Q: 1 caseAll aircraft: 60 casesProbable cause
Fluids: fuelAircraft › Fluids/misc hardware · Fluid levelCessna 182Q: 4 casesAll aircraft: 1,695 casesProbable cause
Object/animal/substance: poleEnvironmental issues › Physical environment · Contributed to outcomeCessna 182Q: 1 caseAll aircraft: 142 cases

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The pilot reported that, during an instrument flight rules cross-country flight, he realized the airplane was "very low on fuel." He added that, with air traffic control's assistance, he diverted to an airport along his route, which was about 30 nautical miles from the intended destination. He further added that he had difficulty locating the airport visually, and when he did locate the runway, the airplane was "too high" to land. Subsequently, as the pilot continued descending and maneuvering toward the runway, the engine lost power, and he landed in a field. He added that, the airplane "hit the field hard," bounced, and struck a utility pole before stopping. The pilot further reported in the NTSB Pilot/ Operator Aircraft Accident/ Incident Report that he was informed that no fuel was found in the airplane and that the right fuel cap was not installed. He reported that he added fuel to both fuel tanks at the departure airport and that there was a "possibility/ likelihood" that he did not secure the right fuel cap during preflight. He added that, during the diversion, he did not complete the "forced landing checklist." The airplane was destroyed. The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

Factual narrative

The pilot reported that, during an instrument flight rules cross-country flight, he realized the airplane was "very low on fuel." He added that, with air traffic control's assistance, he diverted to an airport along his route, which was about 30 nautical miles from the intended destination. He further added that he had difficulty locating the airport visually, and when he did locate the runway, the airplane was "too high" to land. Subsequently, as the pilot continued descending and maneuvering toward the runway, the engine lost power, and he landed in a field. He added that, the airplane "hit the field hard," bounced, and struck a utility pole prior to stopping. The pilot further reported in the NTSB Pilot/ Operator Aircraft Accident/ Incident Report, that he was informed that no fuel was found in the airplane and that the right fuel cap was not installed. He reported that he added fuel to both fuel tanks at the departure airport and there was a "possibility/ likelihood" that he did not secure the right fuel cap during preflight. He added that during the diversion, he did not complete the "forced landing checklist." The airplane was destroyed. The pilot did not report that there were any preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

Aircraft

Registration
N735KQ
Reported as
Cessna 182 (Q)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
18265488
Built
1977
Airframe hours
2,473.5
Engine
Continental O-470-U, 230 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · February 1, 2017
Departed
AWO · Arlington, WA
Destination
GPI · Kalispell, MT
Flight plan
IFR
Airport
5U5 · Fairfield, runway 18, 3,800 × 40 ft, dirt
Equipment
Electronic flight bag or handheld device, Stall warning system

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
60
Injuries
Minor
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 3, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
November 8, 2015
Seat
Left
Restraint
3-point
Flight hours
576.5 total · 44.2 in this make and model

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
Calm
Visibility
7 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
81 °F, dew point 30 °F
Altimeter
30.05 inHg
Observed at
KGTF, 26 nm away

Docket · 2

The files NTSB released with the investigation on November 1, 2017, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 5.9 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.