IAD00LA006

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172N · Hopedale, MA · November 15, 1999

Accident · No injuriesLimited investigationFinal report
Date
November 15, 1999, 09:00 local (14:00 UTC)
Place
Hopedale, MA
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N738NLCessna 172N
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report June 23, 2000
Report
Approved by Office Director
FAA report
19991115032329A
Case key
47769

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

was the student pilot's improper flare that resulted in a bounced landing and the flight instructor's delay in taking remedial action.

Sequence of events

NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.

Loss of control - on ground/waterLanding - flare/touchdown
Weather condition - crosswind
Flare - improperPilot in commandCause
Remedial action - delayedPilot in command(cfi)Cause
In flight collision with terrain/waterDescent - uncontrolled

Analysis

The student pilot returned to his home airport with his flight instructor. The student attempted the landing with a 50 degree left crosswind of 12 to 21 knots. The airplane bounced, 'turned into the wind', and departed the left side of the runway. The flight instructor assumed the flight controls but was unable to recover the airplane before it crossed a fence line parallel to the runway, struck the ground, and nosed over.

Factual narrative

On November 15, 1999, at 0900 eastern standard time, a Cessna 172N, N738NL, sustained substantial damage during collision with terrain following a bounced landing at the Hopedale Industrial Park Airport (1B6), Hopedale, Massachusetts. The certificated flight instructor and student pilot were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the instructional flight that originated at 1B6, approximately 0745. No flight plan was filed for the flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91.

In a written statement, the flight instructor said:

"My student and I entered the traffic pattern at 1B6 on a 45 [degree] angle to the downwind of runway 36 after announcing our intentions on 122.8. We discussed traffic pattern procedures. We reduced power and added 10 [degrees] of flaps. While on downwind, we continued to review landing checklist. We turned base leg and added 20 [degrees] of flaps, [and] trimmed the airplane for an approach speed of 65 knots. We then turned final and discussed crosswind landing procedures. We reduced power, added 30 [degrees] of flaps, and continued with an approach speed of 65 knots. We bounced on landing, with an insufficient amount of right rudder, and the airplane turned into the wind.

"I took control of the airplane and added power in an attempt to control the airplane and get it back over the runway. With an insufficient amount of airspeed, we touched down up on the other side of the fence. The airplane then flipped over."

In a written statement, the student pilot reported:

"Entered traffic pattern, turned base, added flaps, turned final, dropped to idle, [and] added last of flaps. Wind slightly gusty. Touched down just to right of centerline [and] hit by gust of wind. Instructor attempted to correct, hit by more gusts. Instructor added power, then crashed. Gusts appeared too strong to correct from."

In a telephone interview, the flight instructor said, "We bounced approximately 8 feet into the air. We didn't bounce that hard, so it appeared that we were assisted by the wind. Over the fence, the wind diminished and the airplane settled to the ground."

The flight instructor said that he did not receive a weather briefing prior to departure. He said that he made a weather determination based on the "Weather Channel", the anemometer at the airport, and monitoring the Automated Terminal Information Services (ATIS) at area airports. The flight instructor stated that after an hour in the training area, the wind speeds increased, and he decided to return to his home airport.

When questioned about the airworthiness and the performance of the airplane, the pilot responded:

"The aircraft was performing fine. It just came out of a 100-hour inspection. I've never had a problem with the airplane."

The flight instructor reported approximately 400 hours of flight experience, of which 150 was in the Cessna 172. He said the student pilot had approximately 7 hours of flight experience.

Winds reported at Pawtucket, Rhode Island, 10 miles south of Hopedale were from 310 degrees at 12 knots gusting to 21 knots.

Aircraft

Registration
N738NL
Reported as
Cessna 172N
Category
Airplane
Serial number
17270107
Airframe hours
5,606
Engine
Lycoming O-320-H2AD, 160 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Registered owner
Hopedale Air Service Inc
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
100 hour · October 21, 1999 · 19 hours before
Departed
1B6
Airport
1B6 · Hopedale Industrial Park, runway 36, 3,172 × 90 ft, asphalt

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
35
Certificates
Commercial, Flight instructor
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, Valid Medical--no waivers/lim.
Seat
Right
Flight hours
397 total · 94 in this make and model · 229 as pilot in command · 115 in the last 90 days · 64 in the last 30 days · 2 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
320° at 17 knots, gusting 22
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
41 °F, dew point 25 °F
Altimeter
29.00 inHg
Observed at
SFZ, 10 nm away

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.