IAD98LA045

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172N · Stevensville, MD · April 12, 1998

Accident · No injuriesLimited investigationFinal report
Date
April 12, 1998, 17:40 local (21:40 UTC)
Place
Stevensville, MD
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N734MNCessna 172N
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report October 30, 1998
Report
Approved by Office Director
FAA report
19980412006549A
Case key
28288

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

the pilot's improper flare, improper recover from a bounced landing, and failure to maintain directional control.

Sequence of events

NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.

Hard landingLanding - flare/touchdown
Flare - improperPilot in commandCause
Recovery from bounced landing - improperPilot in commandCause
Loss of control - on ground/waterLanding - roll
Directional control - not maintainedPilot in commandCause
Ground loop/swerve
On ground/water collision with objectLanding - roll
Object - wind sock/indicator

Analysis

A witness reported the airplane landed hard on the nose wheel and continued to bounce down the runway. Each bounce increased in severity and magnitude. The pilot lost directional control, and the airplane departed the runway and struck a wind direction indicator to the right of the landing surface. The pilot said he applied right rudder during the landing, but did not recall applying brakes. He reported the airplane had no mechanical deficiencies. An operational check of the airplane's braking system by an FAA Airworthiness Inspector revealed no discrepancies.

Factual narrative

On April 12, 1998, at 1740 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 172N, N734MN, was substantially damaged when it collided with a wind direction indicator during landing at the Bay Bridge Airport (W29), Stevensville, Maryland. The certificated private pilot and passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the personal flight that originated at Culpepper, Virginia (CJR), at 1630. A Visual Flight Rules flight plan had been filed for the flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91.

In a telephone interview, the pilot stated the flight from CJR to W29 was uneventful and he entered the downwind leg of the traffic pattern for Runway 29. While on final approach, he set full flaps and established an airspeed of 60 knots. He said:

"Everything was perfect. I flared and it bounced once or twice a little bit. Then it skidded to the right and went into the grass. The wing struck the wind 'T', went into the ditch and turned around...I don't remember applying the brakes. I did have right rudder in."

An experienced pilot witnessed the accident and was interviewed by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Aviation Safety Inspector. According to the Inspector's Record of Telephone Call, the witness stated:

"I saw the airplane come in on runway 29. The pilot let the nose wheel hit first and it hit pretty hard. It started bouncing, three or four times, severe bouncing, increasing in magnitude. Immediately after the bouncing stopped, the pilot lost directional control of the airplane and it veered immediately to the right and left [departed] the runway. It went into a gully and hit the wind tee, the airplane bounced and turned around 180 degrees."

The FAA Inspector described the skid marks on the runway in a written statement. He said:

"The right skid mark (facing in the direction of runway 29) was most pronounced and was approximately 30 to 40 feet long. It was to the right of the centerline and it veered to the right towards the wind tee on the right side of the runway."

When questioned about the airworthiness of the airplane, the pilot stated he found no mechanical deficiencies with the airplane during his preflight inspection or during the flight. He stated:

"It was in perfect shape, absolutely no problem. The engine sounded perfect and the flight controls were normal."

In a telephone interview, an FAA Airworthiness Inspector who examined the wreckage stated he found no pre-impact anomalies. He further stated the airplane's braking system was checked and found to operate with no deficiencies.

Winds reported at Easton, Maryland, 14 miles southeast of W29, were from 330 degrees at 5 knots.

Aircraft

Registration
N734MN
Reported as
Cessna 172N
Category
Airplane
Serial number
17268961
Airframe hours
4,958
Engine
Lycoming O-320, 160 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Operator
Aero Safety Flight Training
Registered owner
R&S Aero Inc
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · August 9, 1997 · 68 hours before
Departed
CJR · Culpepper, VA
Destination
W29 · MD
Flight plan
VFR
Airport
W29 · Bay Bridge, runway 29, 2,910 × 60 ft, asphalt

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
38
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Medical
Class 3, Valid Medical--no waivers/lim.
Seat
Left
Flight hours
250 total · 13 in this make and model · 168 as pilot in command · 6 in the last 90 days · 2 in the last 30 days · 1 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
330° at 5 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
63 °F, dew point 28 °F
Altimeter
30.00 inHg
Observed at
ESN, 15 nm away

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.