LAX02FA101

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 425 · San Jose, CA · March 6, 2002

Accident · FatalField investigationFinal report
Date
March 6, 2002, 10:35 local (18:35 UTC)
Place
San Jose, CA
Injuries
3 fatal
Damage
Destroyed
Phase of flight
Enroute
Aircraft
N444JVCessna 425
Weather
Instrument (IMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report June 2, 2004
Report
Approved by Office Director
Parties
Pratt & Whitney Canada, Federal Aviation Administration, Cessna Aircraft Company
FAA report
20020306003909A
Case key
54310

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

the pilot's loss of control and resulting exceedence of the design stress limits of the aircraft, which led to an in-flight structural failure. The pilot's loss of control was due in part to the loss of primary airspeed reference resulting from pitot tube icing, which was caused by the internal failure of the pitot heat switch. Factors in the accident were the pilot's distraction caused by the airspeed reading anomaly and spatial disorientation.

Sequence of events

NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.

Loss of control - in flightClimb - to cruise
Weather condition - clouds
Anti-ice/deice system - selectedPilot in command
Weather condition - icing conditionsCause
Anti-ice/deice system,pitot heat - not operatingCause
Airspeed indicator - incorrect
Aircraft control - not maintainedPilot in commandCause
Diverted attentionPilot in commandFactor
Spatial disorientationPilot in commandFactor
Airframe/component/system failure/malfunctionDescent - uncontrolled
Design stress limits of aircraft - exceededPilot in commandCause
Wing - overload
Horizontal stabilizer - overload
In flight collision with terrain/waterDescent - uncontrolled
Terrain condition - ground

Analysis

The aircraft was on an IFR clearance and climbing through a cloud layer when it broke up in flight following an in-flight upset. The weather conditions included multiple cloud layers from 4,000 to 13,000 feet, with a freezing level around 7,000 feet msl. An AIRMET was in effect for occasional moderate rime to mixed icing-in-clouds and in-precipitation below 18,000 feet. As the airplane began to intercept a victor airway, climbing at about 2,000 feet per minute (fpm), and passing through 6,700 feet, the airplane began a series of heading and altitude changes that were not consistent with its ATC clearances. The airplane turned right and climbed to 8,600 feet, then turned left and descended to 8,000 feet. The airplane then turned right and climbed to 8,500 feet, where it began a rapidly descending right turn. At 1034:33, as the aircraft was descending through 7,000 feet, the pilot advised ATC "four Juliet victor I just lost my needle give me..." No further transmissions were received from the accident airplane and the last radar return showed it descending through 3,200 feet at about 11,000 fpm. Analysis of radar data shows the airplane was close to Vmo at the last Mode C return. Ground witnesses saw the airplane come out of the clouds in a high speed spiral descent just before it broke up about 1,000 feet agl. Examination of the wreckage showed that all structural failures were the result of overload. The aircraft was equipped with full flight instruments on both the left and right sides of the cockpit; however, the flight director system attitude director indicator and horizontal situation indicator were only on the left side. The aircraft was also equipped for flight into known icing conditions, with in part, heated pitot tubes (left and right sides), static sources, and stall warning vanes. During the on-scene cockpit examination, except for the pitot heat switches, the cockpit controls and switches were found to be configured in positions consistent with the aircraft's phase of flight prior to the in-flight upset. The right pitot heat switch was found in the ON position, while the left switch was in the OFF position. The left pitot heat switch toggle lever was noticeably displaced to the left by impact with an object in the cockpit. With the exception of the left pitot heat, the anit-ice and deice system switches were all configured for flight in icing conditions. The pitot heat switches, noted to be of the circuit breaker type (functions as both a toggle switch and circuit breaker), were removed from the panel and sent to a laboratory for examination and testing. Low power stereoscopic examination of the switches found that the right switch was intact, while the toggle lever mechanism of the left switch was broken loose from the housing. Microscopic examination of the left switches housing fracture surface revealed imbedded debris and wear marks indicative of an old fracture predating the accident. The broken left switch could be electrically switched by physically holding the toggle lever mechanism in the appropriate ON or OFF position. The electrical contact resistance measurements of the left switch varied between 0.3 and 1.4 ohms, and was noted to be intermittently open with the switch in the ON position. Both switches were then disassembled. While particulate debris was found in both switches, the left one had a significant amount of large coarse fibrous lint-like debris. The flexible copper conductor of the left switches circuit breaker section had several broken strands, and the electrical contacts were dirty. The laboratory report concluded that the left switches toggle was bent to the left in the impact sequence; however, the housing fracture predated the accident and allowed an internal build-up of large coarse fibrous lint-like debris. The combined effects of the broken housing, the resulting misalignment of the toggle mechanism, the dirty contacts, and the large coarse lint debris prevented reliable electrical switching of the device and presented the opportunity for intermittently open electrical contacts. Continuity of the plumbing from the pitot tubes and static ports to their respective instruments was verified. Electrical continuity was established from the bus power sources through the circuit breakers and switches to the heating elements of the pitot tubes and static sources. The heating elements were connected to a 12-volt battery and the operation of the heating elements verified.

Factual narrative

1.1 History of flight

On March 6, 2002, at 1035 Pacific standard time, a Cessna 425, N444JV, experienced a loss of control and a subsequent in-flight breakup at San Jose, California. The aircraft descended to ground impact in an area of rolling, hilly pasture land. The aircraft was owned and operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. The aircraft was destroyed in the accident sequence. The instrument rated private pilot and two passengers sustained fatal injuries. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed at the altitude where the loss of control occurred. The flight departed the Reid-Hillview airport in San Jose at 1029, and was en route nonstop to La Paz, Mexico. An instrument flight rules flight plan was filed, and the pilot had received an instrument clearance prior to departure.

According to a review of recorded air-to-ground communications tapes and radar data obtained from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Bay Terminal Radar Approach Control facility, the aircraft was initially cleared after takeoff to climb to 13,000 feet msl on radar vectors to Victor airway 485. The controller issued a heading of 110 degrees, then told the pilot to intercept the airway and proceed on course. The communications tapes, along with recorded radar data, disclosed that the airplane was climbing at about 2,000 feet per minute (fpm) through 6,700 feet when it began a series of heading and altitude changes that were not consistent with its ATC clearances. The airplane turned right and climbed to 8,600 feet, then turned left and descended to 8,000 feet. The airplane then turned right and climbed to 8,500 feet, where it began a rapidly descending right turn. At 1034:33, as the aircraft was descending through 7,000 feet, the pilot advised ATC "four Juliet victor I just lost my needle give me..." No further transmissions were received from the accident airplane and the last radar return showed it descending through 3,200 feet about 11,000 fpm.

A ground witness to the accident was riding a horse about 1.5 miles from the impact site and was attracted to the airplane by a loud "screaming" jet sound. She looked up and saw the aircraft descend out of the clouds "in a cork-screw pattern." As the airplane got close to the ground, the flight path changed from a descent to a climb while still in the corkscrew turn, with the ascending corkscrew turns much tighter than the descending ones. The airplane then seemed to level off momentarily before it began an arcing and spiraling turn until it disappeared behind a hill. Additional witnesses on a golf course about 0.5-miles from the impact location heard a loud sound they characterized as like an explosion or gunshot. The airplane then rolled level, and continued in an arcing horizontal spin until it disappeared behind a hill. These two witnesses reported that they saw parts falling from the airplane and that it was "smoking."

Other ground witnesses located on a nearby golf course reported that they saw parts falling from the aircraft as it descended to the ground.

1.2 Personnel information

The pilot's FAA Airman and Medical Records files were reviewed and they disclosed that he held a US private pilot certificate with land airplane ratings for single, multiengine, and instruments. The certificate was most recently issued as a replacement for a lost certificate on April 24, 2001. The US certificate was issued on the basis of Canadian pilot certificate number WGP 9287, and the records noted that the US certificate was valid only when accompanied by the Canadian certificate.

Detailed review of the airman record files disclosed that he first applied for a US private pilot certificate on the basis of his Canadian certificate on November 3, 1967. A US multiengine land practical test was passed on April 3, 1979, and that class rating was added to his certificate. The pilot applied for and passed the US written and practical tests for an airplane single engine instrument rating on October 11, 1988. On April 18, 1989, the pilot passed the US practical instrument rating test for multiengine airplanes; this test was taken in a Beech 90. The application for this practical test listed a total flight time of 1,956 hours, with 247 in the Beech 90.

The pilot held a third-class medical certificate, which was issued on August 2, 2000, with limitations that he wear corrective lenses and possess glasses for near and intermediate vision. At the time of the medical examination, the pilot reported a total flight time of 4,556 hours.

The pilot's most recent personal flight record book covering the period from November 2000 to the date of the accident was recovered in the wreckage and showed a total pilot time of 4,987 hours, with 2,471 hours in multiengine airplanes. The log recorded 636 hours of actual instrument flight time, with 138 hours of simulated instrument experience. The pilot purchased the airplane on October 10, 2000, and he logged about 400 hours in it prior to the accident.

The logbook showed a pattern of flight activity that was consistent at about 35 hours per month. On January 5, 2002, a biennial flight review was endorsed in the logbook, with the entry noting a total flight of 2.7 hours, with 1.9 hours in actual instrument conditions. An entry dated January 6, 2002, endorsed the completion of an instrument competency check. That entry listed a flight time of 3.4 hours, with 2.1 flown in simulated instrument conditions. The numbers of approaches flown are not delineated in the entry.

In the 90 and 30 days prior to the accident, the logbook records a total hours flown of 86 and 29, respectively.

A search of the FAA airman records database disclosed no record that the passenger who occupied the right front seat had ever held any grade of pilot certificate.

1.3 Aircraft information

The maintenance records were obtained from the facility, which performed the maintenance on the aircraft, Turbine Air, Inc., Hayward, California. In addition, information was obtained from Cessna Aircraft and Pratt & Whitney of Canada manufacturing records, and the official FAA Aircraft and Registry files.

According to the records examined, the aircraft, serial number 425-0013, was manufactured in December 1980, and was purchased by the pilot in October 2000. At the time of the accident, the airframe had accumulated a total time in service of 4,315 hours. The aircraft was equipped with full flight instruments on both the left and right sides of the cockpit; however, the flight director system attitude director indicator and horizontal situation indicator were only on the left side. The aircraft was also equipped for flight into known icing conditions, with in part, heated pitot tubes (left and right sides), static sources, and stall warning vanes.

The aircraft was maintained on the Cessna Continuous Airworthiness Inspection Program for the model 425. The program consists five inspection phases, with varying flight hour intervals between phases depending on the phase number. A chart detailing the inspection requirements is appended to this report. According to the records, the most recent Phase 2 inspection (100-hour/annual equivalent) was completed on March 5, 2002, 2 hours prior to the accident. The most recent pitot-static system test and certification in accordance with 14 CFR 91.411 was accomplished on September 28, 2001.

In September 2000, the original Pratt & Whitney of Canada PT6A-112 engines and Hartzell 3-bladed propellers were removed from the airplane. Factory new PT6A-135A engines, serial numbers PZ0040 and PZ0041, were installed in the respective left and right positions. In addition, factory new 4-bladed McCauley 4HFR34C762-1 propellers were installed, serial numbers 992818 on the left side and 000463 on the right position. This work was accomplished in accordance with Supplemental Type C

Aircraft

Registration
N444JV
Reported as
Cessna 425
Category
Airplane
Serial number
425-0013
Airframe hours
4,315
Engine
Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-135A, 750 horsepower, turbo prop
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Operator
Henry Guenther
Registered owner
Henry Guenther Trustee
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Continuous airworthiness · March 5, 2002 · 2 hours before
Departed
RHV · San Jose, CA
Destination
MMLP · La Paz
Flight plan
IFR

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
62
Injuries
Fatal
Certificates
Foreign, Private
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 3, Valid Medical--w/ waivers/lim
Last flight review
January 6, 2002
Seat
Left
Toxicology
Performed
Flight hours
4,987 total · 86 in the last 90 days · 29 in the last 30 days

Weather

Conditions
Instrument (IMC) · Day
Wind
210° at 8 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
4,000 ft broken
Temperature
61 °F, dew point 48 °F
Altimeter
29.97 inHg
Observed at
SJC, 14 nm away

Docket · 49

The files NTSB released with the investigation on April 14, 2004, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 30.4 MB in all.

Materials Laboratory 15 - Factual Report of Annunciator Panel Light Bulb ExaminationItem 1 · .PDF · 52 KBLaboratory Examination of Pitot Heat SwitchesItem 2 · .PDF · 1.1 MBMetallurgical Laboratory Report of Wing Spar Fracture ExaminationItem 3 · .PDF · 1.4 MBLaboratory Report, Fuel Sample TestsItem 4 · .PDF · 122 KBAircraft Performance 13 - Factual Report of Group Chairman, Radar and Performance StudyItem 5 · .PDF · 1.1 MBWreckage Diagrams, Site MapsItem 6 · .PDF · 261 KBTranscript of Radio Communications, Bay TRACONItem 7 · .PDF · 236 KBTranscript of Communications, Pilot Weather BriefingItem 8 · .PDF · 106 KBWitness Statements, Summaries of InterviewsItem 9 · .PDF · 77 KBWitness StatementItem 10 · .PDF · 181 KBMeteorology 5 - Factual Report of Group ChairmanItem 11 · .PDF · 498 KBMeteorology 5 - Attachment 1Item 12 · .PDF · 1.3 MBMeteorology 5 - Attachment 2Item 13 · .PDF · 1.5 MBMeteorology 5 - Attachment 3Item 14 · .PDF · 3.0 MBMeteorology 5 - Attachment 4Item 15 · .PDF · 366 KBMeteorology 5 - Attachment 5Item 16 · .PDF · 2.4 MBMeteorology 5 - Attachment 6Item 17 · .PDF · 2.0 MBCessna Engineering Report on Vn InformationItem 18 · .PDF · 138 KBReport of Propeller ExaminationsItem 19 · .PDF · 60 KBReport of Engine TeardownsItem 20 · .PDF · 90 KBAuto Pilot Component Examination ReportItem 21 · .PDF · 114 KBAuto Pilot System Manufacturers Report of Component ExaminationsItem 22 · .PDF · 497 KBFAA 8020.6 Report and Personnel StatementsItem 23 · .PDF · 344 KBRecorded Radar Data, Secondary Beacon and All Primary ReturnsItem 24 · .PDF · 1.3 MBAircraft Weight & Balance ComputationsItem 25 · .PDF · 326 KBFueling ReceiptItem 26 · .PDF · 12 KBMaintenance Manual Extract, Aircraft Description and Station LocationsItem 27 · .PDF · 298 KBMaintenance Records ExtractsItem 28 · .PDF · 3.3 MBExtracts of Pilot Log BookItem 29 · .PDF · 788 KBToxicological ReportItem 30 · .PDF · 51 KBStatement of Party Representatives to NTSB InvestigationItem 31 · .PDF · 315 KBRelease of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15Item 32 · .PDF · 468 KBPhoto 1. Aerial view of accident site showing the aircraft and the debris trial (white specks) going toward the upper right.Item 33 · .PDF · 303 KBPhoto 2. Overall view of main wreckage site showing impact ground scar and wreckage in background.Item 34 · .PDF · 739 KBPhoto 3. General view of main wreckage mass.Item 35 · .PDF · 726 KBPhoto 4. Front view of aircraft.Item 36 · .PDF · 740 KBPhoto 5. View of empennageItem 37 · .PDF · 728 KBPhoto 6. View of the horizontal stabilizers in the debris fieldItem 38 · .PDF · 733 KBPhoto 7. Right propellerItem 39 · .PDF · 693 KBPhoto 8. Left propellerItem 40 · .PDF · 745 KBPhoto 9. View of Anti-ice/De-ice switch panel showing positions of left and right pitot heat switchesItem 41 · .PDF · 678 KBPhoto 10. View of reconstructed left wingItem 42 · .PDF · 42 KBPhoto 11. View of left wing spar failuresItem 43 · .PDF · 44 KBPhoto 12. Reconstructed right side of horizontal stabilizer and elevatorItem 44 · .PDF · 44 KBPhoto 13. Reconstructed left side of horizontal stabilizer and elevatorItem 45 · .PDF · 42 KBPhoto 14. Detail view of left main forward spar cap deformationItem 46 · .PDF · 44 KBPhoto 15. Reconstructed right wingItem 47 · .PDF · 42 KBPhoto 16. Tip end view of reconstructed right wingItem 48 · .PDF · 43 KBPhoto 17. Right forward lower main spar cap deformationItem 49 · .PDF · 41 KB

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.